Uproar over detention of 36 Jordanian students protesting water deal

Jordanians carry flags and placards as they demonstrate against the declaration of intent for water-for-energy deal. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 26 November 2021
Follow

Uproar over detention of 36 Jordanian students protesting water deal

  • Thirty MPs sign petition for release amid claims students defied security directive  

AMMAN: Several Jordanian MPs have joined activists, human rights groups and civil society organizations in calling for the release of 36 Jordanian students detained this week for reportedly taking part in a protest against Jordan’s signing of a declaration of intent with Israel to trade clean electricity for water.

MP Khalil Atiyeh told Arab News on Friday that he was “dismayed” the students had not yet been released.

Atiyeh led the signing of a petition by 30 MPs protesting the arrests, which have been criticized by human rights groups and civil society organizations. 

“I spoke in parliament about the case calling for their immediate release and was promised that they would be released, but until now they haven’t been freed,” Atiyeh said.

Jamal Jeet, a member of the National Forum for the Defense of Freedom, told Arab News that the governor of Amman had ordered that the detained students should be held in prisons a long way from the capital as a way of punishing them and their families.  

Jeet called the detention orders “illegal,” claiming they violate articles seven and eight of the Jordanian constitution, which guarantee citizens’ right to the freedoms of expression and assembly.

“They are being held according to laws that are intended to keep criminals away from the general public because they are dangerous,” he said.

Around 3,000 demonstrators gathered in downtown Amman on Friday to protest the deal with Israel. Many held signs bearing the names of the detained students. 

A Jordanian official, who asked to remain anonymous, denied claims that authorities were targeting anyone expressing opposition to the agreement and pointed out that no students had been arrested for protesting on a university campus.

The 36 detained students had broken the law by protesting in Dakhiliyah (Interior) Circle, “a vital central area in the heart of Amman, where they blocked the movement of people and traffic,” the official said.

“Security officials asked the students several times to leave and demonstrate in another area to avoid jeopardizing road safety and disruption to traffic, people’s movement, and businesses, but they refused,” the official added. “Our regulations protect the right to demonstrate peacefully and guarantee the safety of participants, but when the law is violated, authorities are obliged to act.”

The official highlighted the fact that hundreds of citizens had demonstrated on Friday and stressed that no one would be arrested for protesting so long as they abided by the law.

“It is unfair and inaccurate to claim that we are targeting those who are opposed to the agreement,” said the official.

The semi-governmental Human Rights Center called the arrests “a violation of the right of expression and assembly and a clear violation of the constitution, which guarantees freedoms and considers it a crime for anyone to violate the freedom of Jordanians.”

Zaid O. Nabulsi, a member of the Royal Commission for the Modernization of Political Systems, told Arab News that the arrests send a “devastating message” to the younger generation, who have been told that that their voices will be heard.

“If you had intended to destroy the hard work of the Royal Committee over the past four months, you could not have achieved your purpose any better,” Nabulsi said.

Himam, a coalition of civil society organizations, issued a statement calling for students’ immediate release and stressed “the need to investigate if they were subject to beatings and ill-treatment which are considered a form of torture.”

Himam also called for the abolition of the law that “treats peaceful protesters as criminals.”

Muath Momani, legal advisor to the Jordanian-based Lawyers without Borders, told Arab News that what happened to the students is unacceptable.

“The penal law is being used to stop people from speaking out,” said Momani. “The political atmosphere should be more open to allowing people to express themselves.”

Ammar Borini, who monitors social media for the Amman Net website, told Arab News that the issue of the students’ arrest has been trending in Jordan.

“Many are expressing anger and quoting the king telling (young people) ‘We want to hear your voice.’ They are saying on social media, ‘Here (are young people) speaking out and they have ended up in jail.’”


Iranian FM slams WEF’s double standards after revoking his invite, but keeping Israeli President’s

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Iranian FM slams WEF’s double standards after revoking his invite, but keeping Israeli President’s

DUBAI: Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has criticised the World Economic Forum (WEF) for rescinding his invitation to the annual meeting in Davos amid his government’s harsh crackdown on nationwide protests, accusing the forum of succumbing to Western pressure and applying “blatant double standards.”

The WEF confirmed that Araghchi will not attend this year’s summit, running until Jan. 23, saying that “although he was invited last fall, the tragic loss of lives of civilians in Iran over the past few weeks means that it is not right for the Iranian government to be represented at Davos this year.”

In a series of posts on X, Araghchi rejected the decision, claiming his appearance was cancelled “on the basis of lies and political pressure from Israel and its U.S.‑based proxies and apologists.”

The Iranian minister criticised what he called the WEF’s “blatant double standards” for keeping an invitation open to Israel’s president despite ongoing allegations of civilian deaths in Gaza. He also referenced Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s participation in last year’s forum in Davos in January 2024 despite facing charges of genocide at the International Criminal Court. 

“If WEF wants to feign a supposedly ‘moral’ stance, that is its prerogative. But it should at least be consistent about it,” Araghchi wrote, arguing that the decision exposed a “moral depravity and intellectual bankruptcy.”