Malaysian ex-PM gets 12 years jail in 1MDB corruption trial

Former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 29 July 2020
Follow

Malaysian ex-PM gets 12 years jail in 1MDB corruption trial

  • Najib also fined $46.7m for abuse of power, money laundering, and criminal breach of trust

KUALA LUMPUR: After two years in trial, former Prime Minister Najib was found guilty by the Malaysian High Court on Tuesday on all counts brought against him and was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment and a fine of $46.7 million.

The trial concerns the $10 million in funds deposited into his account from SRC International Sdn Bhd, a subsidiary company of the highly controversial Malaysian sovereign wealth fund, 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).

High Court Judge Nazlan Mohd Ghazali found the ex-PM and former finance minister guilty of criminal breach of trust, abuse of power and corruption charges brought against him in 2018. 

Najib, who was once untouchable, fell from grace after his ruling coalition lost the majority in the 13th general election in 2018. 

In under two months after his electoral defeat, he was charged with multiple counts of criminal breach of trust, abuse of power and money laundering involving RM42 million ($9.9 million) of SRC International funds in July 2018. 

Ghazali, in his summary, said: “After considering all evidence in this trial, I find that the prosecution has successfully proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt,” adding: “I, therefore, find the accused guilty and convict the accused on all seven charges.”

The decision made by the Malaysian court today is the first judgement against Najib, who has been slapped with a variety of charges related to 1MDB. 

Over the years, Najib has maintained his innocence, writing on his Facebook yesterday that he would continue his fight to “clear his name.”

“The money was paid to me by a private company that was itself paid by a subsidiary of SRC for CSR (corporate social responsibility). Whatever the verdict tomorrow is at the high court, this is not the end,” he said.

He added that should the verdict at the high court not turn in his favor, he would “bring the case to the Court of Appeal for a fair judgement by a panel of three judges and not one single judge like tomorrow’s (July 28, 2020) verdict.”

1MDB is a state investment fund which initially aimed to boost Malaysia’s investment portfolios and has since been the center of an extensive, international investigation involving billions of dollars in misappropriated funds.

In a finding by the US Department of Justice, it claimed that $4.5 billion was siphoned from the state fund between 2009 and 2014. 

The money was laundered through multiple countries, including Singapore, Switzerland, and the US. 

Malaysian and US officials concluded that the 1MDB funds were used by those in the know to buy exorbitant big-ticket items like luxurious jewels, a superyacht, a private jet, and to fund the Hollywood film “The Wolf of Wallstreet.”

The state fund was founded by Najib, who has been charged with 42 counts of criminal breach of trust, money laundering and abuse of power. 

Malaysian authorities had seized luxury goods and cash from properties linked to the former premier, worth up to $273 million. 

Najib, however, claims that some items were gifts to his wife and daughter and that a royal family in the Gulf donated the funds.

Political analyst Azmi Hassan, from the Technology University of Malaysia, told Arab News that Najib and his defense team would no doubt file for an appeal, starting at the Court of Appeal. 

“If that fails, then Najib can go up to the Federal Court, and since Malaysia doesn’t practice trial by jury, today’s decision is based on the judgement of the High Court judge,” Hassan said. 

He added that the expected verdict might have led Najib to point out in his July 27 Facebook post that if he were to be found guilty, he would have more chance in the higher courts, where the Appeal Court has three judges and the federal court is comprised of a panel of five judges.

“In terms of political impact, I see the current government growing stronger since the perception is that Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin is taking a hands-off approach towards the trial,” Hassan said.

Other trials against Najib relating to the 1MDB scandal are still ongoing, with some dates scheduled for 2021.


Australia bans a citizen with alleged links to militant Daesh group from returning from Syria

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Australia bans a citizen with alleged links to militant Daesh group from returning from Syria

  • The woman was planning to join another 33 Australians and fly on Monday from Damascus to Australia, Burke said
  • “These are horrific situations that have been brought on those children by actions of their parents”

MELBOURNE: Australia’s government banned an Australian citizen with alleged ties to the militant Daesh group from returning home from a detention camp in Syria, the latest development in the case of fraught repatriation of families of Daesh fighters.
The woman was planning to join another 33 Australians — 10 women and 23 children — and fly on Monday from Damascus, Syria, to Australia, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Wednesday.
But the group was turned back by Syrian authorities to the Roj detention camp, due to unspecified procedural problems.
The Australian government had acted on news that the group planned to leave Syria, Burke said. He said the woman, whom he did not identify, had been issued with a temporary exclusion order on Monday and her lawyers had been provided with the paperwork on Wednesday.
She was an immigrant who left Australia for Syria sometime between 2013 and 2015, Burke said, declining to elaborate on whether she had children — though he generally blamed the parents for the predicaments of their offspring stranded in Syria.
“These are horrific situations that have been brought on those children by actions of their parents. They are terrible situations. But they have been brought on entirely by horrific decisions that their parents made,” Burke told Australian Broadcasting Corp.
Burke has the power to use temporary exclusion orders to prevent high-risk citizens from returning to Australia for up to two years.
The laws were were introduced to in 2019 to prevent defeated Daesh fighters from returning to Australia. There are no public reports of an order being issued before.
Burke said security agencies had not advised that any of the other Australians in the group warranted an exclusion order. Such orders can’t be made against children younger than 14.
Confusing messages at a cramped camp
At the Roj camp, tucked in Syria’s northeastern corner near the border with Iraq, the Australian women who had expected to travel home refused to speak to The Associated Press on Wednesday.
One of the women, Zeinab Ahmad, said they had been advised by an attorney not to talk to journalists.
A security official at the camp, Chavrê Rojava, said that family members of the detainees — who she said were Australians of Lebanese origin — had traveled to Syria to arrange their return. They brought temporary passports that had been issued for the would-be returnees, Rojava said.
“We have no contact with the Australian government regarding this matter, as we are not part of the process,” she said. “We have left it to the families to resolve.”
Rojava said that after the group had departed the camp to travel to Damascus, they were contacted by a Syrian government official and warned to turn back. The families were “very disappointed” upon returning to the camp, she said.
“We recently requested that all countries and families come and take back their citizens,” Rojava said.
She added that Syrian authorities do not want to see a “repeat of what happened in Al-Hol camp” — a much larger camp, also in northeastern Syria that once housed tens of thousands of people, mostly women and children, with alleged ties to Daesh.
Last month, during fighting between Syrian government forces and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, which had controlled Al-Hol, guards abandoned their posts and many of the camp’s residents fled.
That raised concerns that Daesh members would regroup and stage new attacks in Syria.
The Syrian government then established control of Al-Hol and has begun moving its remaining residents to another camp in Aleppo province. The Kurdish-led force remains in control of Roj camp and a ceasefire is now in place.
The thorny issue of repatriating Daesh-linked foreign citizens
Former Daesh fighters from multiple countries, their wives and children have been detained in camps since the militant group lost control of its territory in Syria in 2019. Though defeated, the group still has sleeper cells that carry out deadly attacks in both Syria and Iraq.
Australian governments have repatriated Australian women and children from Syrian detention camps on two occasions. Other Australians have also returned without government assistance.
Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Wednesday reiterated his position announced a day earlier that his government would not help repatriate the latest group.
“These are people who chose to go overseas to align themselves with an ideology which is the caliphate, which is a brutal, reactionary ideology and that seeks to undermine and destroy our way of life,” Albanese told reporters.
He was referring to the militants’ capture of wide swaths of land more than a decade ago that stretched across Syria and Iraq, territory where Daesh established its so-called caliphate. Militant from foreign countries traveled to Syria at the time to join the Daesh. Over the years, they had families and raised children there.
“We are doing nothing to repatriate or to assist these people. I think it’s unfortunate that children are caught up in this, that’s not their decision, but it’s the decision of their parents or their mother,” Albanese added.