Ukraine strikes may have hit 15% of Russian refinery capacity — NATO official

Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries may have disrupted more than 15 percent of Russian capacity, a NATO official said on Thursday, adding that the alliance believed Moscow still lacked sufficient munitions and manpower to launch a successful offensive. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 05 April 2024
Follow

Ukraine strikes may have hit 15% of Russian refinery capacity — NATO official

  • “In terms of damage, the strikes have probably disrupted more than 10 percent of Russia’s refinery capacity, maybe more than 15 percent,” the official said
  • Around 14 percent of Russia’s refining capacity has been shut down by drone attacks

BRUSSELS: Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries may have disrupted more than 15 percent of Russian capacity, a NATO official said on Thursday, adding that the alliance believed Moscow still lacked sufficient munitions and manpower to launch a successful offensive.
Russia and Ukraine have both used drones to strike critical infrastructure, military installations and troop concentrations in their more than two-year-old war, with Kyiv hitting Russian refineries and energy facilities in recent months with some strikes entering 1,000 km (620 miles) into Russian territory.
“In terms of damage, the strikes have probably disrupted more than 10 percent of Russia’s refinery capacity, maybe more than 15 percent. Depending on the extent of the damage, repairs could take considerable time,” the official told reporters on condition of anonymity.
“Fewer and fewer of these types of Russian energy, critical infrastructure...are safe from potential strikes,” the official said.
According to Reuters calculations, around 14 percent of Russia’s refining capacity has been shut down by drone attacks.
Damaged Russian refineries will get back to normal operations by early June, Russian Energy Minister Nikolai Shulginov said, quoted by Interfax news agency.

HEAVY LOSSES
The NATO official said Russia was recruiting about 30,000 people a month to absorb heavy losses, but that while it maintained a significant advantage over Ukraine in terms of munitions, manpower and equipment, it was unlikely to accomplish any major breakthrough in the immediate term.
“They’re likely to be unable to mount any mount any significant offensive operation without another large-scale mobilization,” the official said, adding that Moscow also had to handle its own munitions’ shortages.
Russia has stepped its attacks on civilian infrastructure in recent weeks and a drone attack on Thursday struck residential buildings in the city of Kharkiv and an energy facility in the surrounding region, killing several people and severing power for 350,000 residents, Ukrainian officials said.
The official said Moscow was likely to ramp up such strikes as it sought to degrade Ukraine’s air defense capabilities.
At a NATO foreign ministers meeting in Brussels on Thursday, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba pleaded for alliance to free up available Patriot air defense systems.
“We expect they will likely continue to advance missile and drone strike packages to penetrate Ukrainian air defenses and place pressure on Ukrainian air defense deployments, underlining the criticality of our aid for these systems to protect the Ukrainian facilities,” the NATO official said.
Moscow has turned to its allies, notably North Korea and Iran, to provide it with more weapons, including ballistic missiles.
When asked whether NATO had seen the transfer of Iranian ballistic missiles to Russia, the official said the alliance did not have that they had yet, but expected Tehran to go through with the transfer once mutual beneficial terms were agreed between the two sides.
“Iran has indicted it intends to do so and that it will ship ballistic missiles to Russia and we have no reason to believe they won’t follow through on that,” the official said.
Iran has denied already providing ballistic missiles to Russia after Reuters reported that it had provided Moscow with a large number of powerful surface-to-surface ballistic weapons, deepening military cooperation between the two US-sanctioned nations.


UK pro-Palestine campaign urges pressure on councillors ahead of elections

Updated 11 sec ago
Follow

UK pro-Palestine campaign urges pressure on councillors ahead of elections

  • They are being urged to commit to ‘upholding the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people’
  • Research has revealed extensive ties between local council-administered pension funds, Israeli military

LONDON: The Palestine Solidarity Campaign on Wednesday launched a campaign urging local councillors across the UK to commit to “upholding the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people.”

The Councillor Pledge for Palestine is the latest effort by the PSC to build pressure on the UK’s political system and encourage systemic change for the benefit of the Palestinian cause. It comes five months ahead of local elections.

Research conducted by the PSC has revealed extensive financial ties between local councils and the Israeli military.

Pension funds administered by councils invest more than £12.2 billion ($16.2 billion) in companies with direct complicity in Israel’s war in Gaza, which has been deemed by the International Court of Justice to plausibly constitute genocide and ethnic cleansing.

The PSC accused these companies of complicity in Israel’s “genocide, ethnic cleansing, military occupation and apartheid against Palestinians.”

Among the investments includes £450 million in BAE Systems, the British multinational that manufacturers components for the F-35 jet used by the Israeli Air Force. The Israeli F-35 variant has been used extensively throughout the Gaza war.

Councillors in the UK must “take all appropriate steps to ensure my council is not complicit in Israel’s violations of international law, including through the council divesting pensions and any other funds it administers from complicit companies,” the PSC’s pledge said.

The campaign is encouraging supporters to contact their local councillors and urge them to make the commitment.

Over the coming months, a list of councillors who have done so will be published, with the aim of building a network that supports Palestinian rights across the country.

Ben Jamal, the PSC’s director, said: “It is not just Westminster politicians who have enabled Britain’s complicity in Israel’s horrific crimes. That guilt extends to council chambers as well, with more than £12 billion of local government pension scheme funds invested in companies profiting from Israel's military occupation and system of apartheid against the Palestinian people.

“Our Councillor Pledge for Palestine gives elected representatives an opportunity to show their constituents they are on the right side of history and that they vow to end this complicity.”

More than three times as many voters support councils divesting pension funds from companies complicit in Israeli crimes than oppose it, according to polling conducted earlier this year on behalf of the PSC.

Of that figure, the ratio is six-to-one among Labour voters, seven-to-one among Liberal Democrats and 11-to-one among Greens.

An existing PSC campaign, Local Government Pension Scheme Divest, has led to 27 councils across the UK passing motions or releasing statements supporting the divestment of pension funds.

The campaign is inspired by an anti-apartheid effort launched in 1983, which at its height led to two-thirds of the British population living in areas administered by councils with anti-apartheid policies.

Nelson Mandela acknowledged the campaign’s influence when he visited the UK after his release from prison.

Jamal said: “After more than two years of Israel’s genocide — which continues to this day, despite the so-called ‘ceasefire’ — people up and down the country are demanding politicians stand up and be counted. Councillors across Britain should answer this call and pledge for Palestine today.”