US says new nuclear deal should include China, accuses Beijing of secret tests

Then-US President Barack Obama, left, and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev sign a treaty cutting their nations’ nuclear arsenals at Prague Castle, Prague on April 8, 2010. (AFP file photo)
Short Url
Updated 06 February 2026
Follow

US says new nuclear deal should include China, accuses Beijing of secret tests

  • “Arms control can no longer be a bilateral issue between the US and Russia,” Rubio wrote
  • “Other countries have a responsibility to help ensure strategic stability, none more so than China“

GENEVA: The United States on Friday urged three-way talks with Russia and China to set new limits on nuclear weapons, as it accused Beijing of conducting secret nuclear tests and dramatically swelling its arsenal.
A day after the expiration of New START — the last treaty between top nuclear powers Washington and Moscow — Beijing reiterated that it did not plan to join disarmament negotiations “at this stage.”
Russia meanwhile suggested other nuclear-armed states such as Britain and France should be included in any talks.
“Arms control can no longer be a bilateral issue between the United States and Russia,” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote in an online essay.
“Other countries have a responsibility to help ensure strategic stability, none more so than China.”
The expiration on Thursday of New START, which restricted the United States and Russia to 1,550 deployed nuclear warheads each, marks the first time in decades that there is no treaty to curtail the positioning of the planet’s most destructive weapons, sparking fears of a fresh arms race.
US President Donald Trump did not accept a proposal from Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin to keep New START’s restrictions in place for another year, and called Thursday for a “new, improved and modernized treaty.”

- Secret nuclear tests? -

Thomas DiNanno, US under secretary of state for arms control, presented the new US plan Friday to the Conference on Disarmament at the United Nations in Geneva, charging that the lapsed New START treaty had “fundamental flaws.”
He accused China of taking advantage of the “legally-binding US-Russian restraint to begin expanding its arsenal at a historic pace,” maintaining that it was “on track to have over 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030.”
“As we sit here today, China’s entire nuclear arsenal has no limits, no transparency, no declarations, and no controls,” he said.
DiNanno also accused Beijing of conducting secret “nuclear explosive tests, including preparing for tests with designated yields in the hundreds of tons.”
He charged that one such test was conducted on June 22, 2020, and accused China of seeking “to conceal testing by obfuscating the nuclear explosions because it recognized these tests violate test ban commitments.”
Trump hinted at similar accusations late last year but without providing the same level of detail.
He said Washington wanted to resume testing nuclear weapons for the first time in decades “on an equal basis” with Moscow and Beijing but without elaborating and so far without following through.

- ‘Irresponsible’ -

China’s ambassador Shen Jian slammed Washington on Friday for “making irresponsible remarks, for instance the threatening of making nuclear weapons tests.”
He also reiterated Beijing’s official position, insisting to the conference that “China would not participate in nuclear disarmament negotiations at this stage.”
“States possessing the largest nuclear arsenals should continue to fulfil their special and primary responsibilities for nuclear disarmament,” he added.
Russia and the United States together control more than 80 percent of the world’s nuclear warheads.
But China’s nuclear arsenal is growing faster than any other country, by about 100 new warheads a year since 2023, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Russia, which has said it no longer considers itself bound by New START limits, said any new nuclear talks should include other nuclear-armed states such as France and Britain, its ambassador Gennady Gatilov told Friday’s conference.
Britain’s ambassador, David Riley, appeared to dismiss the idea, saying “the United Kingdom maintains a minimum credible nuclear deterrent” and that arms control talks should focus on “those states with the largest nuclear arsenals — China, Russia and the US.”
French ambassador Anne Lazar-Sury meanwhile said Paris believed “credible measures capable of reducing the risk of nuclear weapons use” should be “the objective of all nuclear-armed states.”
Trump has said New START was “badly negotiated” and “is being grossly violated.”
Russia in 2023 rejected inspections of its nuclear sites under the treaty, as tensions rose with the United States over Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine.
But Trump has resumed diplomacy with Putin’s Russia. The two countries on Thursday announced a resumption of direct military dialogue to avert crises.


House to vote on Iran war powers resolution in a test of Trump’s strategy

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

House to vote on Iran war powers resolution in a test of Trump’s strategy

WASHINGTON: The House is preparing to vote Thursday on a war powers resolution to halt President Donald Trump’s attack on Iran, a sign of unease in Congress over the rapidly widening conflict that is reordering US priorities at home and abroad.
It’s the second vote in as many days, after the Senate defeated a similar measure along party lines. Lawmakers are confronting the sudden reality of representing the American people in wartime and all that entails — with lives lost, dollars spent and alliances tested by a president’s unilateral decision to go to war with Iran.
The tally in the House is expected to be tight, but the outcome will provide an early snapshot of the political support, or opposition, to the US-Israel military operation and Trump’s rationale for bypassing Congress, which alone has the power to declare war.
“Donald Trump is not a king, and if he believes the war with Iran is in our national interest, then he must come to Congress and make the case,” said Rep. Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Meeks said in his nearly three decades in Congress, the hardest votes he has taken have been deciding whether to send US troops to war.
The roll calls are a clarifying moment for the president and the parties just days into the overseas conflict that has quickly carried echoes of the long US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Many veterans of those wars have since run for office and now serve in Congress.
Republicans largely back Trump, and most Democrats oppose the war
Trump’s Republican Party, which narrowly controls the House and Senate, largely sees the conflict with Iran not as the start of a new war, but the end of a regime that for decades has long menaced the West. The operation has killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which some view as an opportunity for regime change, though others warn of a chaotic power vacuum.
Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, the GOP chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, publicly thanked Trump for taking action against Iran, saying the president is using his own constitutional authority to defend the US against the “imminent threat” the country posed.
Mast, an Army veteran who worked as a bomb disposal expert in Afghanistan, said the war powers resolution was effectively asking “that the president do nothing.”
For Democrats, Trump’s war with Iran, influenced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is a war of choice that is testing the balance of powers in the US Constitution.
“The framers weren’t fooling around,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., arguing that the Constitution is clear that only Congress can decide matters of war.
He said whether lawmakers support or oppose the Trump administration’s military action, they should have the debate. “It’s up to us, we’ve got to vote on it.”
While views in Congress are largely falling along party lines, there are crossover coalitions. Both the House and Senate resolutions were bipartisan, and are drawing bipartisan support and opposition. The House is also voting on a separate resolution affirming that Iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism.
The war powers resolution, if signed into law, would immediately halt Trump’s ability to conduct the war unless Congress approved the military action. The president would likely veto the measure.
As an alternative, a small group of Democrats has proposed a separate war powers resolution that would allow the president to continue the war for 30 days before he must seek congressional approval. It is not expected to come yet for a vote.
Trump officials provide shifting rationale for war
After launching a surprise attack against Iran on Saturday, Trump has scrambled to win support for a conflict that Americans of all political persuasions were already wary of entering. Trump administration officials spent hours behind closed doors on Capitol Hill this week trying to reassure lawmakers that they have the situation under control.
Six US military members were killed over the weekend in a drone strike in Kuwait, and Trump has said more Americans could die. Thousands of Americans abroad have scrambled for flights, many lighting up the phone lines at congressional offices as they sought help trying to flee the Middle East.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the war could extend eight weeks, twice as long as the president himself first estimated. Trump has left open the possibility of sending US troops into what, so far, has largely been bombing campaign by air. Hundreds of people in the region have died.
The administration said the goal is to destroy Iran’s ballistic missiles that it believes are shielding its nuclear program. It has also said Israel was ready to act against Iran, and American bases would face retaliation if the US did not strike first. On Wednesday, the US said it torpedoed an Iranian warship near Sri Lanka.
“This administration can’t even give us a straight answer of as to why we launched this preemptive war,” said Rep. Thomas Massie, the Republican from Kentucky who is often an outlier in his party.
Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who had teamed up to release the Jeffrey Epstein files, also forced the war powers resolution to the floor, pushing past objections from House Speaker Mike Johnson.
Johnson has warned that it would be “dangerous” to limit the president’s authority while the US military is already in conflict.
Senators sit in their desks for solemn vote
In the Senate, Republican leaders have successfully, though narrowly, defeated a series of war powers resolutions pertaining to several other conflicts during Trump’s second term. This one, however, was different.
Underscoring the gravity of the moment Wednesday, Democratic senators filled the chamber and sat at their desks as the voting got underway.
“Today every senator — every single one — will pick a side,” Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said before the vote. “Do you stand with the American people who are exhausted with forever wars in the Middle East or stand with Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth as they bumble us headfirst into another war?”
Sen. John Barrasso, second in Senate Republican leadership, said “Democrats would rather obstruct Donald Trump than obliterate Iran’s national nuclear program.”
The legislation failed on a 47-53 tally mostly along party lines, with Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky in favor and Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania against.