Fears over migration and crime push Chile’s presidential race to the right

This combination of file pictures created on Nov. 14, 2025 shows Chile’s presidential candidates. Chileans head to the polls on November 16 and all candidates agree on the need to crack down on crime gangs that have destabilized the country. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 15 November 2025
Follow

Fears over migration and crime push Chile’s presidential race to the right

  • The anti-immigrant backlash has transformed a nation that just four years ago elected the bright young hope of the Latin American left, President Gabriel Boric
  • This time around, experts say heightened nativist fears give Kast a better shot

SANTIAGO: Fans sported MAGA-style caps. AC/DC blasted from the speakers. Red, white and blue flags flapped in the wind. Crowds whooped and cheered as the man of the hour lamented the surge of migrants across the border.
“This country isn’t falling apart,” he bellowed. “It is being shot to pieces, by bullets.”
You’d be forgiven for assuming this was a rally for US President Donald Trump.
But this eruption of visceral rage at immigrants took place in Santiago, Chile, at the final campaign event for Johannes Kaiser, a radical libertarian gaining traction before Sunday’s presidential election in Chile, where rising fears of uncontrolled migration have pushed everyone in this race — even the governing coalition’s Communist candidate, Jeannette Jara — to the right.
Kaiser is “the only one with a firm hand, the only one who can pull us out of the United Nations, close the borders to all the Venezuelan criminals,” said Claudia Belmonte, 50, peering out from beneath the brim of a red cap emblazoned with Kaiser’s promise to “Make Chile Great Again.”
Such demands for a “mano dura,” a “firm hand,” against disorder have reshaped Chilean politics as transnational gangs like Tren de Aragua surged across borders from crisis-stricken Venezuela and elsewhere in recent years, importing kidnappings, car jackings and other violent crimes previously unseen in one of Latin America’s safest nations.
“People in Chile never had problems with foreigners. But you hear about a gang burying someone alive in your neighborhood and it changes you,” said Carlos Jadué, 49, a lemon vendor in central Santiago.
The anti-immigrant backlash has transformed a nation that just four years ago elected the bright young hope of the Latin American left, President Gabriel Boric, a millennial protest leader who handily defeated the ultraconservative lawyer José Antonio Kast with vows to “bury neoliberalism” after the nation’s 2019 social upheaval.
This time around, experts say heightened nativist fears give Kast a better shot. Even if he won’t clinch the 50 percent of votes needed to win outright in Sunday’s first round, polls show him likely facing off against Jara in a Dec. 14 runoff.
A Kast victory would bear out a regional trend that has seen recent right-wing electoral wins in Argentina, Bolivia and Ecuador.
“There are regional structural factors pushing politics rightward in Latin America,” said Michael Albertus, a professor of political science at the University of Chicago, citing widespread perceptions that a surge in immigration has made crime worse.
Anger turned toward immigration
In Santiago, few vestiges remain of the 2019 mass protests against inequality — known here as “el estallido” or “the explosion” — in which as many as a million Chileans marched to vent a generation’s worth of economic and political grievances.
One is the stone plinth in the city’s Plaza Italia where protesters battled nightly with police, torching buildings and braving birdshot. The bronze statue of a 19th-century Chilean war hero was defaced, then taken down for what authorities promised would be a quick restoration.
Four years later, the plinth, scarred by anti-government graffiti, remains empty and freighted with symbolism. Protesters see a reminder of all that’s unaddressed. Chile retains the neoliberal constitution adopted in 1980 by military dictator Gen. Augusto Pinochet after Boric twice failed to change it — a key demand of the uprising.
Critics see a reminder of the lawlessness of that time.
“I was left-wing until the ‘estadillo,’ when I watched chaos taking over our streets,” said Sebastian Jaramillo, a 36-year-old at Kaiser’s rally on Wednesday. “I started watching YouTube videos about the decline of our country, I got politicized.”
In the rallies of Kaiser and Kast, some recognize a familiar revulsion at the centrist consensus that has held sway since the dictatorship.
“The anger from the ‘estallido’ didn’t disappear. It stayed, it festered,” said Juan Medina, 40, who works at a theater in downtown Santiago. “Instead of turning our anger on inequality, the economic system, the political class, we’ve redirected it toward migrants.”
Communist and devout Catholic find common ground

Throughout the campaign, Chile’s presidential contenders have sought to outdo each other with anti-immigrant proposals inspired by Trump and El Salvador’s iron-fisted president, Nayib Bukele.
It’s not only on the right.
Jara of the Communist Party — the only left-wing front-runner, as Boric can’t run for a consecutive term — has also leaned into a law-and-order message, promising to build prisons and deploy armed forces to Chile’s borders.
The former union leader advocates raising the minimum wage, but, in stark contrast to Boric, proposes no changes to Chile’s market-led economic model. She dropped plans to nationalize lithium and copper mining. Her platform calls insecurity her “top priority.”
“Observers say this is an election between two extremes — a communist candidate, two far-right candidates,” said Robert Funk, a political scientist at the University of Chile. “Actually, there’s quite a lot of consensus on things like immigration and fiscal restraint.”
Kast, a devout Catholic and father of nine who opposes same-sex marriage and abortion, even in cases of rape, has found a tough-on-migration platform holds more appeal than culture war battles. For his third presidential bid, he has kept quiet about his conservative values. His German-born father’s Nazi party membership hasn’t come up.
Yet for all his vows to deport tens of thousands of people and build a giant border wall, Kast looks moderate next to Kaiser.
Both have stolen the spotlight in recent weeks from Chile’s establishment option, center-right former mayor Evelyn Matthei.
Immigrants fear what’s to come
Chile’s foreign population has doubled since 2017, with 1.6 million immigrants recorded last year in the nation of 18 million. Crime has gone up, too, with homicides increasing by 215 percent between 2019 and 2022, according to prosecutors.
But experts say that candidates’ portrayals of Chile as a crime-infested wasteland ignores the extent to which homicides have been falling in the last two years.
At a rally this month, Kast addressed the estimated 330,000 undocumented migrants in Chile — most of whom have fled political persecution and economic collapse in Venezuela — urging them to get out and “sell what you have” before he forced them to “leave with only the clothes on your back.”
Rights groups warn that the incendiary rhetoric is already fueling real violence.
The family of Yaidy Garnica Carvajalino, a 43-year-old Venezuelan cake baker who was fatally shot by her neighbor last June, is calling on authorities to prosecute her killing as a hate crime. Footage shows their Chilean neighbor spouting racially charged insults before opening fire.
“We’re immersed in a self-manufactured discourse of hate,” said Braulio Jatar, a Chilean-Venezuelan lawyer who represents Carvajalino’s daughters and similar cases. “It’s a contagion, and it’s here.”


8 in 10 British Muslims face ‘financial faith penalty’ when seeking home finance, survey finds

Updated 04 February 2026
Follow

8 in 10 British Muslims face ‘financial faith penalty’ when seeking home finance, survey finds

  • Restricted choices plague potential buyers

LONDON: Eight in 10 British Muslims say their home finance choices are restricted because of their faith, according to a new national survey that highlighted what researchers describe as a growing “financial faith penalty” in the UK housing market.

The report, published by Islamic home finance fintech firm Offa, found that 80 percent of Muslim respondents believe their religious beliefs limit their access to suitable home finance, while those who do use Islamic products often face slower decisions, heavier paperwork and poorer customer experiences than in the conventional mortgage market.

Based on surveys of 1,000 British Muslims conducted by Muslim Census, and 2,000 non-Muslims carried out by OnePoll, the research calls on providers, brokers and policymakers to modernize Islamic home finance and improve access to Sharia-compliant products.

Among the 24.3 percent of British Muslims who have used Islamic home finance, just 5 percent said they had received a same-day decision.

Some 62 percent waited up to two weeks, while 33 percent waited more than 15 days, including 16 percent who waited over a month.

Long decision times were cited as the biggest challenge by 28 percent of respondents, followed by excessive paperwork (22.6 percent) and poor customer service (18.9 percent).

Islamic home finance differs from conventional mortgages by avoiding interest and steering investment away from sectors considered harmful to society, including gambling, alcohol, tobacco, arms trading and animal testing.

Sagheer Malik, chief commercial officer and managing director of home finance at Offa, said the findings showed British Muslims were being underserved by outdated systems.

Malik said: “Property is the asset class of choice for many of the UK’s 3.87 million Muslims, both as a route to generational wealth and as a long-term financial foundation, yet our insightful research report reveals that British Muslims are being underserved and deterred by slow, outdated and opaque Islamic home finance provision.

“This is not a niche concern. It goes to the heart of financial fairness and inclusion in modern Britain.”

He added that Muslims deserved Sharia-compliant products that matched mainstream standards on “price, speed and simplicity.”

Despite strong demand, uptake remains low.

Only 12.8 percent of British Muslims surveyed said they currently use Islamic home finance, with a further 11.5 percent having done so in the past. More than three quarters (75.7 percent) have never used it.

Faith plays a central role in financial decisions, with 94.2 percent saying it is important that their financial products align with their ethical or religious beliefs. Yet more than half of those using conventional mortgages said they felt unhappy or uneasy about doing so because of their faith.

The study also found that British Muslims share similar home ownership aspirations to the wider population, with 79.1 percent citing the desire to provide a stable home for their family, while 18.6 percent said building generational wealth was their main motivation. Only 2.2 percent said they did not want to own a home.

The report suggests Islamic finance could appeal beyond Muslim communities. While 64 percent of non-Muslim respondents had never heard of Islamic home finance, 63 percent said they favored its ethical principles once explained.

Younger generations were the most receptive, with 43 percent of Generation Z and 37 percent of millennials saying they would consider using Islamic home finance, compared with just 7 percent of baby boomers. More than three quarters of Gen Z and 72 percent of millennials also said it was important that their finance provider avoided investing in ethically harmful sectors.

Offa said the findings pointed to an opportunity to expand ethical finance in the UK, provided the industry can deliver faster, simpler and more transparent services.