Middle East and the US are leading in AI adoption, says Palantir CEO

The countries adopting AI are in the US and in the MidEast, Alex Karp, CEO and co-founder of Palantir, tells FII Priority Summit. (Supplied)
Short Url
Updated 23 February 2024
Follow

Middle East and the US are leading in AI adoption, says Palantir CEO

  • It is time to throw out the playbook in order to succeed, says Alex Karp

MIAMI: Alex Karp, CEO of data mining and AI-assisted software firm Palantir, believes “that the world will be shaped through the embodiment of ideas and words in software platforms.

“These platforms are so levered that, in fact, they will shape our life in a way that words used to,” he said at the FII Priority Summit in Miami on Friday.

In order to succeed in today’s world, it is essential to think outside the box and outside any playbook — whether that is in finance, hardware, or any other sector, he said.

“What’s super interesting about the AI revolution is that almost none of the playbook rules make sense,” he added.

The countries adopting AI and utilizing it to its full potential are in the US and in the Middle East, Karp continued.

“In hardware, the value is having a community of people who are all very good, and in software, the value is having the one right person.”

It seems like a small difference but it is not; it is largely the reason attempts to build ecosystems like Silicon Valley have failed, “because the people building them are not software natives,” said Karp.

He continued that it is perhaps why countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are “embracing these technologies in a way that I wish other places in West Europe would.”

Armed with a background in social sciences and academia, 20 years ago Karp co-founded Palantir, which received early backing from CIA investment arm In-Q-Tel and does contract work for government agencies like the US Department of Defense, the Federal Bureau of Investigations and the Danish National Police.

Addressing the balance between privacy and ethics, Karp said that the company’s core intel products deal with privacy issues “by exposing authorities and only authorities to the data they’re allowed to see without seeing the other data that they’re not allowed to see.”

He said: “I’m very pro civil liberties but you have to augment both civil liberties and GDP and they’re not in contradiction.”

It is often “people who are allergic to technical issues (that) are actually the adversaries of the enlightenment, because if your enterprise doesn’t work, your country doesn’t work, and nothing can work,” said Karp.

At a time when the world is riddled with war, and these wars are happening “in very complicated electronic suppressed environments,” one cannot use old hardware anymore, said Karp.

“You have to engage in software war and almost all useful hardware things going forward will be software-enabled or controlled.”

Data ownership and privacy are even more critical amid increasing geopolitical tensions, so “your products have to work in an environment where you can understand your supply chain even as it’s disrupted” and even potentially predict disruptions, he continued.

“Treat your company and all of its latent assets as a portfolio under the condition that the portfolio will be very different tomorrow than it is today.”

Karp sees the future of AI as still undecided.

“This is a place where the innovation ramp is so great that the most important thing really is what do you do in the next 18 months.”

For the US, the testing ground for this technology is currently in the military, he added. 

“What will be decided is, can America and its allies get to a point of decisive dominance and then impose regulation on the rest of the world from that perspective of dominance? That would be the best outcome,” concluded Karp.


Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

Updated 09 February 2026
Follow

Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

ALULA: Global trade is not retreating into deglobalization despite geopolitical shocks, but is instead undergoing a structural reshuffling led by US-China tensions, according to Harvard University economist Pol Antras. 

Presenting research at the AlUla Emerging Market Economies Conference, Antras said there is no evidence that countries are systematically turning inward. Instead, trade flows are being redirected across markets, creating winners and losers depending on export structure and exposure to Chinese competition. 

This comes as debate intensifies over whether supply-chain disruptions, industrial policy and rising trade barriers signal the end of globalization after decades of expansion. 

Speaking to Arab News on the sidelines of the event, Antras said: “I think the right way to view it is more a reorganization, where things are moving from some countries to others rather than a general trend where countries are becoming more inward looking, in a sense of producers selling more of their stuff domestically than internationally, or consumers buying more domestic products than foreign products.”  

He said a change of that scale has not yet happened, which is important to recognize when navigating the reshuffling — a shift his research shows is driven by Chinese producers redirecting sales away from the US toward other economies. 

He added that countries are affected differently, but highlighted that the Kingdom’s position is relatively positive, stating: “In the case of Saudi Arabia, for instance, its export structure, what it exports, is very different than what China exports, so in that sense it’s better positioned so suffer less negative consequences of recent events.” 

He went on to say that economies likely to be more negatively impacted than the Kingdom would be those with more producers in sectors exposed to Chinese competition. He added that while many countries may feel inclined to follow the United States’ footsteps by implementing their own tariffs, he would advise against such a move.  

Instead, he pointed to supporting producers facing the shock as a better way to protect and prepare economies, describing it as a key step toward building resilience — a view Professor Antras underscored as fundamental. 

Elaborating on the Kingdom’s position amid rising tensions and structural reorganization, he said Saudi Arabia holds a relative advantage in its economic framework. 

“Saudi Arabia should not be too worried about facing increased competitive pressures in selling its exports to other markets, by its nature. On the other hand, there is a benefit of the current situation, which is when Chinese producers find it hard to sell in US market, they naturally pivot to other markets.” 

He said that pivot could benefit importing economies, including Saudi Arabia, by lowering Chinese export prices. The shift could increase the Kingdom’s import volumes from China while easing cost pressures for domestic producers.