Musk’s X feeds monetization of wartime misinformation

X has seen a tsunami of falsehoods about the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas, fueled partly by prominent US influencers. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 14 February 2024
Follow

Musk’s X feeds monetization of wartime misinformation

  • Some creators exploit platform incentives to spread war misinformation
  • Platform faces accusations of deliberately ignoring misinformation to boost engagement

WASHINGTON: Influencers on X are monetizing misinformation about conflicts in the Middle East, leveraging the platform’s contentious policies that researchers say prioritize engagement over accuracy.
Since Elon Musk’s turbulent 2022 acquisition of X, formerly Twitter, the site has restored thousands of once-banned accounts and introduced a paid verification system that critics say has boosted conspiracy theorists.
X also rolled out an ad revenue-sharing program for verified users, who often peddle hateful and false information to profit from the platform.
“Cynical pay-for-play controversialists today deliberately induce anger for engagement to game Musk’s platform into giving them more visibility, and therefore more revenue for their views,” Imran Ahmed, chief executive of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), told AFP.
X has seen a tsunami of falsehoods about the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas, fueled partly by prominent US influencers such as Jackson Hinkle, who last month falsely claimed a video showed Iran bombing American military bases in Iraq.
The incendiary post came amid widespread concerns about a wider conflagration in the Middle East.
Using a reverse image search, AFP fact-checkers found the video actually depicted an attack in Iraq’s Kurdistan region.
In another provocative post debunked by AFP, Hinkle wrongly claimed that Yemen had declared “war with Israel” in support of the Palestinians.
While Yemen’s Houthi rebels have targeted Israel with missiles and drones, neither they nor the country’s internationally recognized government has formally declared war.

In addition to raising tens of thousands of dollars on crowdfunding sites, Hinkle offers “premium content” to subscribers on X for $3 per month.
“Your support helps me continue exposing the Deep State after I was banned & demonetized by YouTube, Twitch, PayPal & Venmo,” his appeal says.
When reached by AFP, Hinkle — whose false posts have garnered millions of views — refused to say how much revenue he was generating on X, instead criticizing coverage of the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East.
Hinkle makes at least $3,000 a month from paid subscribers, according to a rough CCDH estimate based on the engagement data of his subscriber-only posts.
Last August, Hinkle disclosed on X that he also earned $1,693 through the ad revenue-sharing scheme, while complaining that other users with smaller engagement were getting bigger payouts.
Britain-based creator Sulaiman Ahmed and Danish physician Anastasia Maria Loupis — both of whom AFP has repeatedly fact-checked for war-related misinformation — are also reaping the benefits of X’s verification and paid subscriber programs.
Neither responded to requests for comment.
CCDH’s Ahmed said Musk has “created a topsy-turvy platform on which authoritative sources struggle to be heard above the noise — while liars and hate actors are put on a pedestal, generating revenue for themselves and the platform.”
X did not respond to AFP’s request for comment.

To be eligible for ad revenue sharing, users must meet requirements such as subscribing to X’s $8 per month premium subscription and having at least 500 followers.
Last year, Musk said posts with Community Notes — an X feature that allows users to refute claims and offer additional context — would be “ineligible for revenue share.”
“The idea is to maximize the incentive for accuracy over sensationalism,” Musk wrote on X.
But Jack Brewster, from the media watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP that “viral posts advancing misinformation frequently do not get flagged by Community Notes.”
In October, NewsGuard analyzed 250 of the most popular posts promoting one of 10 prominent false or unsubstantiated narratives about the Israel-Hamas war.
Only 32 percent of them had been flagged by a Community Note, it found.
The following month, NewsGuard identified ads from 86 major companies — including top brands, governments, and nonprofits — on viral posts advancing “false or egregiously misleading claims about the Israel-Hamas war.”
That included an ad for the FBI on a post from Hinkle that falsely claimed a video showed an Israeli military helicopter firing on its own citizens.
The video actually showed Israeli war planes over Gaza, NewsGuard said, adding that the post — viewed nearly two million times — did not have a Community Note.
“Community Notes as currently structured is not a system that scales to cover all contexts,” Jacob Shapiro, a Princeton University professor who served on the program’s advisory group before Musk’s acquisition, told AFP.
“To expect volunteer labor alone to capture... deceptive content as a defense against allowing people to monetize that content reflects unrealistic expectations for what the tool can do.”


China’s national security agency in Hong Kong summons international media representatives

Updated 06 December 2025
Follow

China’s national security agency in Hong Kong summons international media representatives

HONG KONG: China’s national security agency in Hong Kong summoned international media representatives for a “regulatory talk” on Saturday, saying some had spread false information and smeared the government in recent reports on a deadly fire and upcoming legislative elections.
Senior journalists from several major outlets operating in the city, including AFP, were summoned to the meeting by the Office for Safeguarding National Security (OSNS), which was opened in 2020 following Beijing’s imposition of a wide-ranging national security law on the city.
Through the OSNS, Beijing’s security agents operate openly in Hong Kong, with powers to investigate and prosecute national security crimes.
“Recently, some foreign media reports on Hong Kong have disregarded facts, spread false information, distorted and smeared the government’s disaster relief and aftermath work, attacked and interfered with the Legislative Council election, (and) provoked social division and confrontation,” an OSNS statement posted online shortly after the meeting said.
At the meeting, an official who did not give his name read out a similar statement to media representatives.
He did not give specific examples of coverage that the OSNS had taken issue with, and did not take questions.
The online OSNS statement urged journalists to “not cross the legal red line.”
“The Office will not tolerate the actions of all anti-China and trouble-making elements in Hong Kong, and ‘don’t say we didn’t warn you’,” it read.
For the past week and a half, news coverage in Hong Kong has been dominated by a deadly blaze on a residential estate which killed at least 159 people.
Authorities have warned against crimes that “exploit the tragedy” and have reportedly arrested at least three people for sedition in the fire’s aftermath.
Dissent in Hong Kong has been all but quashed since Beijing brought in the national security law, after huge and sometimes violent protests in 2019.
Hong Kong’s electoral system was revamped in 2021 to ensure that only “patriots” could hold office, and the upcoming poll on Sunday will select a second batch of lawmakers under those rules.