UK Labour Party risks losing Muslim voters over Gaza war stance

Pro-Palestinian activists and supporters wave flags and carry placards during a National March for Palestine in central London. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 31 January 2024
Follow

UK Labour Party risks losing Muslim voters over Gaza war stance

  • “We know we’ve lost the Muslim vote, and at the very least their trust," MP says

LONDON: The Labour Party in the UK has started surveying British Muslim voters amid growing concern among senior officials about the damage done to one of its strongest bases of support by the party’s stance on Gaza.

Labour sources told The Guardian newspaper that the party had been conducting polls and organizing focus groups across the UK, with the General Election thought to be only months away.

One senior Labour MP told the paper: “Muslims are not only predominantly Labour supporters but they are also geographically important. There are many of them in a range of key target seats in both the south and the northwest, and we need to pay attention to that.”

A frontbencher said: “We know we’ve lost the Muslim vote, and at the very least their trust.

“The Muslim community is no longer a safe voter base for us because of how we initially responded to the war. So we’re just focused on damage control; we all know it.”

MPs concerned about the issue have formed new groups to influence Labour leader Keir Starmer. His office, meanwhile, has begun to focus on how it communicates with party members who feel ignored.

The crisis within the party escalated following Starmer’s interview in October in which he said Israel had the right to withhold power and water from Gaza, a stance he later drew back from.

His refusal to support a ceasefire led to further unrest, with 56 Labour MPs breaking party ranks to vote for a Scottish National Party ceasefire motion, resulting in the resignation of eight shadow ministers.

Labour Friends of Palestine and the Middle East has become a central organizing hub. Another is a WhatsApp group of about 30 MPs who share not only policy thoughts but also security advice, given the threats made to some Labour MPs, especially in areas with many Muslim voters.

David Lammy, the shadow foreign secretary, and Sue Gray, Starmer’s chief of staff, are in regular dialogue with this group. Shabana Mahmood, the shadow justice secretary and a prominent Muslim figure in the party, has taken a leading role in these discussions.

Internal tensions persist, especially after Wayne David, the shadow Middle East and North Africa minister, said that Labour would recognize Palestine only after negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians started. This stance has drawn criticism from some party members, who argue it undermines Palestinian self-determination.

Recent polls by research organization UK in a Changing Europe show that nearly half of Britain’s 2 million Muslim voters supported Labour in the last election, underscoring the significance of this voter base. Concerns are growing that a narrow margin in the polls could affect outcomes in key constituencies with high Muslim populations.

The formation of The Muslim Vote, a grassroots group aiming to increase Muslim electoral participation, further highlights Labour’s challenges. This group intends to influence voting in constituencies based on MPs’ positions on ceasefire motions.

Beyond the Muslim vote, Labour also faces the risk of losing support in affluent, predominantly white regions like Bournemouth, Bristol, and Brighton, where sympathy for the Palestinian cause is strong.

“We’re expecting to see middle-class Labour supporters sympathetic to the Gaza crisis back the Greens because of their immediate ceasefire calls,” one Labour MP told The Guardian.

Another cautioned that the amount of footage from Gaza on social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok was radicalizing younger voters in particular.

A party source told The Guardian: “The discontent is much wider than the leadership realizes. If we don’t get on top of this soon we are going to have trouble later this year.”
 


Greenland should hold talks with the US without Denmark, opposition leader says

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Greenland should hold talks with the US without Denmark, opposition leader says

COPENHAGEN: Greenland should hold direct talks with ​the US government without Denmark, a Greenlandic opposition leader told Reuters, as the Arctic island weighs how to respond to President Donald Trump’s renewed push to bring it under US control.
Trump has recently stepped up threats to take over Greenland, reviving an idea he first floated in 2019 during his first term in office.
Greenland is strategically located between Europe and North America, making it a critical site for the US ballistic missile defense system. Its rich mineral resources also fit Washington’s goal of reducing dependence on China.
The ‌island is ‌an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark. It has ‌its ⁠own ​parliament ‌and government, but Copenhagen retains authority over foreign affairs and defense.
“We encourage our current (Greenlandic) government actually to have a dialogue with the US government without Denmark,” said Pele Broberg, the leader of Naleraq, the largest opposition party and the most prominent political voice for Greenland’s independence.
“Because Denmark is antagonizing both Greenland and the US with their mediation.”
Naleraq, which strongly advocates a rapid move to full independence, doubled its seats to eight in last year’s election, winning 25 percent of the ⁠vote in the nation of just 57,000.
Although excluded from the governing coalition, the party has said it wants a ‌defense agreement with Washington and could pursue a “free association” ‍arrangement — under which Greenland would receive US ‍support and protection in exchange for military rights, without becoming a US territory.
All Greenlandic ‍parties want independence but differ on how, and when, to achieve it.

GOVERNMENT SAYS DIRECT TALKS NOT POSSIBLE
Greenlandic Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt said Greenland could not conduct direct talks with the US without Denmark because it is not legally allowed to do so.
“We must respect the law, and we ​have rules for how to resolve issues in the Kingdom,” she told Sermitsiaq daily late on Wednesday.
The Danish and Greenlandic governments did not immediately reply ⁠to requests for comment on Broberg’s remarks.
The comments come ahead of a planned meeting between the Danish and Greenlandic foreign ministers and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio next week to address tensions between NATO allies.
Motzfeldt said it was important to set Greenland’s relationship with Washington on a steady course.
“My greatest hope is that the meeting will lead to a normalization of our relationship,” she told Sermitsiaq.
Rubio appears not to favor a military operation, according to France’s foreign minister. But others in the Trump administration say the option is on the table.
“We are going to make sure we defend America’s interests,” US Vice President JD Vance told Fox News in an interview aired late on Wednesday. “And I think the president is ‌willing to go as far as he has to make sure he does that.”
(Reporting by Tom Little and Stine Jacobsen in Copenhagen; additional reporting by Soren Jeppesen; writing by Gwladys Fouche; Editing ‌by Ros Russell)