Greenland should hold talks with the US without Denmark, opposition leader says

Trump has recently stepped up threats to take over Greenland. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 January 2026
Follow

Greenland should hold talks with the US without Denmark, opposition leader says

  • All Greenlandic ‍parties want independence but differ on how, and when, to achieve it

COPENHAGEN: Greenland should hold direct talks with ​the US government without Denmark, a Greenlandic opposition leader told Reuters, as the Arctic island weighs how to respond to President Donald Trump’s renewed push to bring it under US control.
Trump has recently stepped up threats to take over Greenland, reviving an idea he first floated in 2019 during his first term in office.
Greenland is strategically located between Europe and North America, making it a critical site for the US ballistic missile defense system. Its rich mineral resources also fit Washington’s goal of reducing dependence on China.
The ‌island is ‌an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark. It has ‌its ⁠own ​parliament ‌and government, but Copenhagen retains authority over foreign affairs and defense.
“We encourage our current (Greenlandic) government actually to have a dialogue with the US government without Denmark,” said Pele Broberg, the leader of Naleraq, the largest opposition party and the most prominent political voice for Greenland’s independence.
“Because Denmark is antagonizing both Greenland and the US with their mediation.”
Naleraq, which strongly advocates a rapid move to full independence, doubled its seats to eight in last year’s election, winning 25 percent of the ⁠vote in the nation of just 57,000.
Although excluded from the governing coalition, the party has said it wants a ‌defense agreement with Washington and could pursue a “free association” ‍arrangement — under which Greenland would receive US ‍support and protection in exchange for military rights, without becoming a US territory.
All Greenlandic ‍parties want independence but differ on how, and when, to achieve it.
Government says direct talks not possible

Greenlandic Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt said Greenland could not conduct direct talks with the US without Denmark because it is not legally allowed to do so.
“We must respect the law, and we ​have rules for how to resolve issues in the Kingdom,” she told Sermitsiaq daily late on Wednesday.
The Danish and Greenlandic governments did not immediately reply ⁠to requests for comment on Broberg’s remarks.
The comments come ahead of a planned meeting between the Danish and Greenlandic foreign ministers and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio next week to address tensions between NATO allies.
Motzfeldt said it was important to set Greenland’s relationship with Washington on a steady course.
“My greatest hope is that the meeting will lead to a normalization of our relationship,” she told Sermitsiaq.
Rubio appears not to favor a military operation, according to France’s foreign minister. But others in the Trump administration say the option is on the table.
“We are going to make sure we defend America’s interests,” US Vice President JD Vance told Fox News in an interview aired late on Wednesday. “And I think the president is ‌willing to go as far as he has to make sure he does that.”
(Reporting by Tom Little and Stine Jacobsen in Copenhagen; additional reporting by Soren Jeppesen; writing by Gwladys Fouche; Editing ‌by Ros Russell)


Israel to seek new security deal with the US, FT reports

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

Israel to seek new security deal with the US, FT reports

Israel is preparing for talks with the Trump administration on a new ​10-year security deal, seeking to extend US military support even as Israeli leaders signal they are planning for a future with reduced American cash grants, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday.
Gil Pinchas, speaking to the FT before stepping down ‌as chief financial ‌adviser to Israel’s military ‌and ⁠defense ministry, ​said ‌Israel would seek to prioritize joint military and defense projects over cash handouts in talks that he expected to take place in the coming weeks.
The US State Department did not immediately respond to a Reuters ⁠request for comment outside regular business hours.
“The partnership ‌is more important than just ‍the net financial issue ‍in this context  ... there are a ‍lot of things that are equal to money,” Pinchas told the FT. “The view of this needs to be wider.”
Pinchas said pure financial support — ​or “free money” — worth $3.3 billion a year, which Israel can use to purchase ⁠US weapons, was “one component of the MOU (that) could decrease gradually.”
In 2016, the US and Israeli governments signed a memorandum of understanding for the 10 years through September 2028 that provides $38 billion in military aid, $33 billion in grants to buy military equipment and $5 billion for missile defense systems.
Earlier this month, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
said he hoped to “taper off” Israeli ‌dependence on US military aid in the next decade.