Student hijab ban sparks fears over women’s access to education in India

An Indian Muslim woman shouts slogans during a protest against barring Muslim girls wearing hijab from attending classes at some schools in the southern Indian state of Karnataka, in New Delhi, India, Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2022. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 12 February 2022
Follow

Student hijab ban sparks fears over women’s access to education in India

  • Girls barred from Karnataka school classes if wearing veil
  • More than 20 major women’s groups protest ban, calling it ‘apartheid’ practice

NEW DELHI: Major women’s rights groups in India have raised concerns over Muslim girls’ access to education after schools in the state of Karnataka barred them from wearing the hijab in classrooms.

The hijab controversy began in late January after Muslim girls at a government-run secondary school in the southern state’s Udupi district began protesting a new rule that prevented them from attending classes if they wore the Islamic head covering.

The local government earlier this month backed the school and banned the wearing of the hijab and “clothes which disturbed peace” at educational institutions.

The order sparked demonstrations in support of Muslim women’s right to wear the headscarf and counter protests by Hindu activists that soon escalated into violence, leading authorities to close local schools for three days.

Protests continued in several Indian cities on Friday, headed by more than 20 women’s organizations, which in an open letter to Karnataka’s chief minister said that the hijab ban was a practice of “apartheid.

“It is basically simply telling them that if you want to study, you will have to study in Muslim-only schools, which means you are enforcing apartheid,” Kavita Krishnan, secretary general of the All India Democratic Women's Association — one of the letter’s signatories — told Arab News on Saturday.

She added that ban was “an attack on Muslim women’s right to education.”

Vani Subramanian from Delhi-based women’s rights group Saheli, which also signed the letter, warned that the ban was more than an attack on education.

“The government is trying to whittle down on Muslim people’s rights in the country, like what you eat, what you wear,” she told Arab News.

Kavita Srivastva of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties — also a signatory — said that the government move was an “attack on Muslim women’s education.

“They don’t want Muslim women to study. The issue will die soon, but by the time it will put fear in so many girls and their families who will feel restrained to send their children to school,” she added.

“In Karnataka there was no such rule and people were free to wear whatever they wanted to wear, be it sari or headscarves.”

For Nabiya Khan, a Muslim activist, poet and writer, the whole controversy is an attempt to “otherize” Muslim women.

“They want to otherize us further and not let Muslims move towards an upward mobility,” she said.

Muslims make up about 12 percent of the population in Karnataka, which is a stronghold of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party.

Since coming to power in 2019, the local government has passed orders tightening the slaughter of beef in the state and introduced regulations making it difficult for interfaith couples to marry and for people to convert to Islam or Christianity.

The Karnataka High Court, which is hearing petitions against the ban, said on Thursday that students in the state should stop wearing religious garments in class until it makes a final ruling on whether schools can bar the wearing of the hijab.


Israel defends Somaliland move at UN amid concerns over Gaza motives

Women walk in front of a gas station, in the city of Hargeisa, Somaliland. (AFP file photo)
Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Israel defends Somaliland move at UN amid concerns over Gaza motives

  • Some states question if recognition part of a bid to relocate Palestinians or establish military bases
  • US President Donald Trump's peace plan for Gaza states: "No one will be forced to leave Gaza, and ⁠those who wish to leave will be free to do so and free to return"
  • US accuses Security Council of double standards after Western countries recognized Palestinian state

UNITED NATIONS: Israel defended on Monday its formal recognition of the self-declared Republic of Somaliland, but several countries at the ​United Nations questioned whether the move aimed to relocate Palestinians from Gaza or to establish military bases.
Israel became the first country to recognize Somaliland as an independent and sovereign state on Friday.
The 22-member Arab League, a regional organization of Arab states in the Middle East and parts of Africa, rejects “any measures arising from this illegitimate recognition aimed at facilitating forced displacement of the Palestinian people or exploiting northern Somali ports to establish military bases,” Arab League UN Ambassador Maged Abdelfattah Abdelaziz told the UN Security Council.
“Against the backdrop of Israel’s previous references to Somaliland of the ‌Federal Republic of ‌Somalia as a destination for the deportation of Palestinian people, ‌especially ⁠from ​Gaza, its unlawful ‌recognition of Somaliland region of Somalia is deeply troubling,” Pakistan’s Deputy UN Ambassador Muhammad Usman Iqbal Jadoon told the council.
Israel’s UN mission did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the remarks or address any of them in its statement at the council meeting. In March, the foreign ministers of Somalia and Somaliland said they had not received any proposal to resettle Palestinians from Gaza.
US President Donald Trump’s peace plan for Gaza states: “No one will be forced to leave Gaza, and ⁠those who wish to leave will be free to do so and free to return.”
Israel’s coalition government, the most right-wing ‌and religiously conservative in its history, includes far-right politicians who advocate the ‍annexation of both Gaza and the West ‍Bank and encouraging Palestinians to leave their homeland.
Somalia’s UN Ambassador Abukar Dahir Osman said ‍council members Algeria, Guyana, Sierra Leone and Somalia “unequivocally reject any steps aimed at advancing this objective, including any attempt by Israel to relocate the Palestinian population from Gaza to the northwestern region of Somalia.”

SOMALILAND VS PALESTINIAN STATE
Somaliland has enjoyed effective autonomy — and relative peace and stability — since 1991 when Somalia descended into civil war, but ​the breakaway region has failed to receive recognition from any other country.
“It is not a hostile step toward Somalia, nor does it preclude future dialogue between ⁠the parties. Recognition is not an act of defiance. It is an opportunity,” Israel’s Deputy UN Ambassador Jonathan Miller told the council.
In September, several Western states, including France, Britain, Canada and Australia announced they would recognize a Palestinian state, joining more than three-quarters of the 193 UN members who already do so.
Deputy US Ambassador to the UN Tammy Bruce said: “This council’s persistent double standards and misdirection of focus distract from its mission of maintaining international peace and security.”
Slovenia’s UN Ambassador Samuel Zbogar disputed her argument, saying: “Palestine is not part of any state. It is illegally occupied territory ... Palestine is also an observer state in this organization.”
He added: “Somaliland, on the other hand, is a part of a UN member state and recognizing it goes against ... the UN Charter.”
Israel said last week that it would seek immediate cooperation with ‌Somaliland in agriculture, health, technology and the economy. The former British protectorate hopes Israeli recognition will encourage other nations to follow suit, increasing its diplomatic heft and access to global markets.