New Delhi says ‘no decision made’ on voting rights for Indians in Gulf

Indians living in the Gulf said it feels like New Delhi is treating them as second-class citizens, even though they are the main source of foreign remittances. (Shutterstock)
Short Url
Updated 18 December 2020
Follow

New Delhi says ‘no decision made’ on voting rights for Indians in Gulf

  • Recent reports suggested that, unlike counterparts in Western countries, Indians in the Gulf will not be allowed to vote
  • Nearly 10 million citizens who live and working in Gulf countries are India’s main source of foreign remittances

NEW DELHI: The Indian government on Thursday said it has not yet decided whether citizens living in foreign countries will be allowed to vote in the upcoming regional elections.

The comment came days after a newspaper report claimed that those in Gulf countries would be denied the opportunity to cast ballots.

English-language daily the Indian Express reported on Tuesday that Indians citizens in several foreign countries — including the US, Canada, Australia, Germany and South Africa — will be granted voting rights, but those in the Gulf will not because the Foreign Ministry has “reservations” about the issue. The report said officials from the election commission and the ministry met last week to discuss the matter.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Anurag Srivastava neither confirmed nor denied the report, but told Arab News: “At this point in time no decision has been taken in this regard.”

India does not have postal-voting mechanisms in place. In November, however, the Election Commission proposed that the government should allow nationals living in other countries to cast ballots there during the upcoming regional elections in several states.

Following the newspaper report, Indians living in the Gulf said it feels like New Delhi is treating them as second-class citizens, even though they are the main source of foreign remittances.

“We are large in numbers and we contribute the maximum in terms of remittances,” said superstore manager Godugu Bhumesh, who has lived in Oman for 10 years.

“It hurts — are we not Indian citizens? Please tell me. Don’t we have Indian passports? Aren’t we sending money from the Gulf to India?”

Almost half of an estimated 20 million overseas Indians — officially known as non-resident Indians (NRIs) — live and work in six Gulf nations. In 2017, their remittances constituted about 53 percent of India’s total cash inflows of about $69 billion, according to data from the Reserve Bank of India.

“New Delhi thinks that the NRIs in the Gulf countries are poor laborers,” said Mohammed Abed, who lives in Dubai. “But the fact remains that remittances from our region are more than what (Indians in the) US and other countries send.”

Basant Reddy, a social activist from Telangana state who provides assistance to NRIs in the Middle East, said: “By denying them voting rights, the Indian government continues with its neglect of Indian workers in the Gulf.”

Professor Irudaya Rajan, of the Center for Development Studies in Trivandrum, Kerala, said: “I think the government must be thinking that managing people in the Gulf would be a problem because of their sheer numbers.”

It might be easier to manage voting among the smaller Indian populations in the UK, US and other countries, he added.

“Out of 20 million Indians abroad, approximately 10 million live in six countries in the Gulf,” Rajan said. “Another 10 million are living in 194 other countries. It is easier to manage those 194 countries than the six countries in the Gulf. This is a huge task — it’s an administrative challenge.”
 


Israeli firm loses British Army contract bid

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Israeli firm loses British Army contract bid

  • Subsidiary Elbit Systems UK’s campaign for $2.6bn program was marred by controversy
  • Senior govt civil servant overseeing contract was dined, handed free Israel tour

LONDON: A UK subsidiary of Israeli weapons giant Elbit Systems has lost its bid to win a prominent British Army contract, The Times reported.

The loss followed high-profile reporting on controversy surrounding Elbit Systems UK’s handling of the bid.

The subsidiary led one of two major arms consortiums attempting to secure the $2.6 billion bid to prepare British soldiers for war and overhaul army standards.

Rivaling Elbit, the other consortium led by Raytheon UK, a British subsidiary of the US defense giant, ultimately won the contract, a Ministry of Defence insider told The Times.

It had been decided following an intricate process that Raytheon was a “better candidate,” the source said.

Elbit Systems UK’s controversial handling of its contract campaign was revealed in reports by The Times.

A whistleblower had compiled a dossier surrounding the bid that was shown to the MoD last August, though the report was privately revealed to the ministry months earlier.

It alleged that Elbit UK had breached business appointment rules when Philip Kimber, a former British Army brigadier, had reportedly shared information with the firm after leaving the military.

Kimber attending critical meetings at the firm to discuss the training contract that he had once overseen at the ministry, the report alleged.

In one case, Kimber was present in an Elbit meeting and sitting out of view of a camera. He reportedly said he “should not be there,” according to the whistleblower’s report.

In response to a freedom of information request, the MoD later admitted that it had held the dossier for seven months without investigating its claims. Insiders at the ministry blamed the investigative delay on “administrative oversight.”

A month after being pushed on the allegations by The Times, a senior civil servant completed an “assurance review” in September and found that business appointment rules had not been breached.

Other allegations concerned lunches and dinners hosted by Elbit UK in which civil servants at the heart of the contract decision process were invited.

One senior civil servant was dined by the British subsidiary seven times, while rival Raytheon did not host events.

Mike Cooper, the senior responsible owner at army headquarters for the army training program, also traveled to Jerusalem with two senior British military officers.

He took part in a sightseeing tour funded by Elbit Systems, the British subsidiary’s parent company.

In response to the allegations, an MoD spokesperson said in a statement: “The collective training transformation programme will modernise training for soldiers to ensure the British Army can face down the threats of the future.

“We will not comment further until a preferred tenderer announcement is made public in due course.”

Amid mounting criticism of Israel within the British military establishment, four former senior army officers, in a letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, recently urged the government to end involvement with Israeli-owned or Israeli-supported weapons companies.

“Now is not the time to return to business as usual with the Israeli government,” they wrote, urging harsher sanctions.