Scores of Afghan medical travelers affected by Pakistan border closure

An Afghan national drags a stretcher carrying a patient before crossing the border into Afghanistan from Pakistan at the Torkham Border Post in Pakistan's Khyber Agency on March 7, 2017. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 17 March 2020
Follow

Scores of Afghan medical travelers affected by Pakistan border closure

  • Afghanistan’s health infrastructure has been devastated by decades of war
  • Mobile health teams sent to attend to nationals stranded in border regions, says Afghan health ministry 

KABUL: Islamabad’s decision to seal the border with Afghanistan on Friday to contain the spread of coronavirus has affected Afghan patients who have been regularly coming to Pakistan for medical treatment.

Many Afghans for years have been seeking medical help abroad, as their own health infrastructure has been devastated by decades of war. Most of them choose Pakistan or India. Medical trips to the latter are now impossible too as New Delhi suspended all existing visas last week.

“If you count the number of patients traveling to India and Pakistan on a daily basis, it will be hundreds, hundreds from across Afghanistan,” Timoor Shah a travel agent in Kabul told Arab News.

“So those who need follow-up medical checks up or other routine treatment are stuck and in trouble. The closure will remain for some time, so I can say that thousands are affected,” he said.

At one of Kabul’s main bus stations where vehicles take passengers by road to Pakistan, scores who had visas had to cancel their visit, as the Pakistani government on Friday evening announced the closure of the country’s borders with Afghanistan and Iran.

“It is a blow for people like me and others who have valid visas and need to go to Pakistan for medication and now can’t go. It is really shocking and very tragic,” said Rahim Shah, 36, who was accompanying his ailing mother.

Health Ministry spokesman Nizamuddin Jalil told Arab News that while the border closure had indeed affected a number of patients traveling for treatment, Afghan health standards were good enough and medical help does not have to be sought abroad.

He said that mobile health teams have been sent to attend to ailing nationals stranded in border regions.

“Our health services have improved. We have done our best to reduce the reliance of Afghans on medication (abroad),” Jalil said, but added that the government’s current priority is coronavirus response.

At least 21 persons have tested positive for the virus, but testing remains limited, raising fears that the number of infected is much higher.

To contain the outbreak, the Afghan government on Saturday suspended all educational institutions and banned mass gatherings, including sporting events and public celebrations of Nowruz, the Persian New Year, which marks the beginning of spring.


What Bangladesh’s election means for India, China and Pakistan ties

Bangladesh Nationalist Party supporters gather for a rally ahead of the upcoming national election, in Sylhet on Jan. 22, 2026.
Updated 08 February 2026
Follow

What Bangladesh’s election means for India, China and Pakistan ties

  • Bangladeshis will vote on Feb. 12, almost two years after the 2024 student-led uprising
  • After nearly 2 years of tensions, experts expect a thaw with India under elected government

DHAKA: As Bangladesh prepares to hold its first elections since the 2024 ouster of Sheikh Hasina, its longest-serving prime minister, the outcome will define Dhaka’s relations with the most important regional powers — China, India, and Pakistan.

Nearly 128 million Bangladeshis will head to the polls on Feb. 12 to bring in new leadership after an 18-month rule of the current caretaker administration.

The interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, took control following a student-led uprising that ended 15 years in power of Hasina and her Awami League party.

The two main parties out of the 51 competing for power are the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Jamaat-e-Islami. The Awami League, which for decades has had close ties with India, was excluded from the election ballot over its role in the deadly crackdown on the 2024 student-led protests, in which 1,400 people were killed.

While Bangladesh’s relationship India has deteriorated since the fall of Hasina, who has been in self-exile in New Delhi, the period of diplomatic strain is expected to ease when the new government takes office.

“Whoever comes to power in Bangladesh, due to domestic pressure in the country, relationships with India need a resetting,” Humayun Kabir, former ambassador to the US, told Arab News.

“It’s anticipated that India will also engage with the new government, but they will protect their interests, and we also have to do the same. It’s most likely that the India-Bangladesh relationship will be normalized under the new, elected, government.”

Since 2024, India has suspended key transshipment access that allowed Bangladeshi exports to go via Indian ports and airports. It also put on hold most normal visa services for Bangladeshis, who were among its largest groups of medical tourists.

From Hasina’s heavy pro-India orientation, the interim government has tried to rebalance Bangladesh’s foreign policy toward the two other key regional players — China and Pakistan — who at the same time are India’s main rivals. 

If New Delhi regains its importance, it should not deal a blow to the newly expanded relations with Pakistan, with whom Bangladesh has recently increased exchanges, especially economic, and last month resumed direct flights — after a 14-year gap.

Since the relations have been expanded under the caretaker government, Prof. Delwar Hossain from the International Relations Department at Dhaka University forecast that they would only further improve, no matter who comes to power, and there is no likelihood of a sudden change.

“For Pakistan, any political coalition — whether BNP or Jamaat — will be positive. The BNP has a long history of having good relations with Pakistan during their rule ... Jamaat also has a strong and very positive influence in Pakistan,” he said.

“For Pakistan, the new regime or new government is not the issue. The issue is what the (India) policy of the new government would be and to what extent it would actually support Pakistan’s view.”

Both the BNP and Jamaat have repeatedly said they wanted friendly relations with India, and Hossain expected that they would, at the same time, continue the balanced approach introduced by the caretaker administration.

“India is a reality as a neighbor. At the same time, India is also showing interest in mending relations or adopting a more cooperative approach after the vote, with the government that will be elected ... I think there will be pragmatism from both sides,” he said.

“I don’t see there is a long-term threat to Bangladesh-India relations ... When China and Pakistan were trying to create a trilateral cooperative system or some kind of coalition — China, Bangladesh and Pakistan — we have seen that Bangladesh opted out. It seems that Bangladesh is going to continue its policy of maintaining a balance among these great powers.”

Bangladesh’s relations with China have not changed since the ouster of Hasina, whose government signed several economic agreements with Beijing. Yunus’s administration has continued this cooperation, and China was among the very few countries he officially visited during his term.

During the visit, he secured about $2.1 billion in Chinese investments, loans and grants, including funding for infrastructure like Mongla Port and a special economic zone in Chattogram — Bangladesh’s largest port. China has also eased visa rules for Bangladeshi businesspeople, medical travelers and tourists.

According to Munshi Faiz Ahmed, Bangladesh’s former ambassador to Beijing, China’s importance for Bangladesh cannot be substituted by any other country, especially as over the past few years it has emerged not only as its key investor, but also the largest trade partner.

In the fiscal year 2024-25, Bangladesh’s trade with China was over $21.3 billion, according to National Board of Revenue data. With India, it was about $11.5 billion.

The trade — especially import — dependence on Beijing started long before the regime change. In terms of trade volume, China overtook India already in 2018.

“Even when people thought that we had very close relations with India, our relations with China continued to grow in terms of trade and commerce ... Our trade with China has surpassed India’s, and China is a much bigger investor in Bangladesh’s development projects,” Ahmed said.

“Bangladesh will continue to cooperate with China for a long time to come because what China can provide, no other country can.”