Mandela’s former aides reveal pivotal role KSA played in his fight for freedom

1 / 3
Nelson Mandela meeting with Saudi Arabia’s King Fahd. (AFP/Getty Images)
2 / 3
Nelson Mandela with Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan in Washington in 1999. (AFP/Getty Images)
3 / 3
Nelson Mandela is sworn in as South Africa’s first post-apartheid leader in May, 1994
Updated 18 July 2018
Follow

Mandela’s former aides reveal pivotal role KSA played in his fight for freedom

  • The Saudi royal family supported many of Mandela’s charitable causes over the years and always extended great hospitality, reveals Zelda La Grange, Mandela's private secretary for 19 years
  • Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan was among a handful of Mandela’s closest friends at his wedding to his third wife in 1998

LONDON: A century ago today, a boy was born who would grow up to change the world.

There was nothing auspicious about his beginnings, although there was perhaps a clue in the name he was given: Rolihlahla, which means “troublemaker” in his native Xhosa language. 

And make trouble he most certainly did, though it was the right kind of trouble and at great cost to himself. 

On May 10, 1994, Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela (he was given his English first name by a teacher) was sworn in as president of South Africa. He was the country’s first black head of state and the first to be elected in a fully representative democratic election. The hateful age of apartheid was finally over.

Nineteen days later, the South African government signed an agreement establishing diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia and in October 1994 President Mandela visited the Kingdom.

It was one of his first trips abroad and the first of many as president to the Gulf, highlighting the importance he accorded to the region. A year after his election, in April 1995, Mandela went to Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the UAE and Bahrain. The following year, he visited Egypt, Libya and Morocco. 

In early 1962, Mandela had secretly left South Africa to travel around the continent building support for the armed struggle against apartheid. He received military training in Morocco and Ethiopia. As president, maintaining good relations with the Arab world was of prime importance, even if it made him unpopular with the West, whose attitude toward him had been ambivalent at best. 

In response to Western concerns over his invitations to Muammar Qaddafi and Fidel Castro, he told Reuters in 1996: “Your (the West’s) enemies are not our enemies. We will not be persuaded to break with our friends because now the great powers in the West want to be our friends. We can be friendly to them without parting with our friends who were with us when we were all alone.” 

After his release from prison in 1990, Mandela embarked on a tour of countries that had supported the African National Congress (ANC) during the years of struggle. Riyadh was among the cities he visited and it was there the future leader forged some of his strongest alliances. 




Britain’s Prince Harry and Meghan the Duchess of Sussex attend the launch of the Nelson Mandela Centenary Exhibition at the Queen Elizabeth Hall in London on Tuesday. (AP)

Tom Lodge, a former professor of political studies at the University of Witwatersrand and author of “Mandela: A Critical Life,” said: “Almost certainly there was more to the visits than to say ‘thank you.’ Mandela continued to raise funds for the ANC, though probably not on a state visit. South Africa in 1994 was short of capital and up to the 1990s it was buying oil in violation of sanctions, very expensively.

“At the time of Mandela’s presidency, he was ready to defend arms sales to various Middle Eastern countries as a reciprocal obligation for anti-apartheid support. He had a particular affection for the Moroccans because of the hospitality they showed him in 1962.”

Mandela was also keen to bring South Africa back into the international fold.

“The drive to strengthen and deepen relations with the Middle East was part of a more general thrust to build links with the international community, which had mostly cut ties with apartheid South Africa,” said Tony Trew, a former communications officer in the Office of the President, who contributed to a book on the Mandela presidency.

“Among other things, it meant shifting the balance of relations and dependencies to some extent from traditional partners of South Africa to others, in particular in Africa, the Middle East and Asia.”

Journalist Khaled Almaeena met Mandela several times, both in Riyadh and the South African capital Pretoria. Years of forced labor breaking rocks in the blinding sun on Robben Island had taken a toll on Mandela’s eyesight, and Almaeena recalls the president having his eyes checked at a Riyadh hospital. 

At their first meeting, Almaeena’s knowledge of South African history, geography and sports so impressed Mandela that he jokingly asked: “Are you sure you are not an Afrikaner?”

Later, when Almaeena visited Pretoria with a group of Saudi business figures, he was touched by the warmth of Mandela’s greeting. 

“As he shook my hand, he said with a gleam in his eye: ‘Here is a Springboks (the South African national rugby team) supporter.’ I felt overwhelmed.”

Mandela’s years in prison had made him reconsider his youthful espousal of communism, he told Almaeena.

“Mandela was frank. He was glad that the socialist system was over by the time he was released. It was a changed world. He was frugal and did not care for the trappings of office.”

As Mandela’s private secretary and personal assistant for 19 years, Zelda La Grange accompanied him on at least eight visits to Riyadh.

“He was friends with the royal family, with the late king (Fahd) and his successor (Abdullah), and also Prince Bandar bin Sultan (Saudi ambassador to the US from 1983 to 2005) and his immediate family,” she recalled. 

“The royal family supported many of Mandela’s charitable causes over the years and always extended great hospitality. Mandela, as a result, fostered a close relationship with the Saudi people and always maintained that relationship.”

His visits were mainly to the king’s and the crown prince’s palaces, although he also liked to visit hospitals in Riyadh that employed South African staff, said La Grange.

However, her presence at Mandela’s side sometimes confused their Saudi hosts. Mandela addressed the blonde, Afrikaans-speaking La Grange as “granddaughter” and usually introduced her as such.

“I remember the king of Saudi Arabia just looking at me, clearly thinking: ‘But she’s white,’” said La Grange.

On one visit, Mandela expressed a desire to visit the holy sites of Makkah and Madinah. Arrangements were made for him, but La Grange was surprised to learn she was barred because she was not Muslim. 

“But Madiba’s not Muslim either,” she exclaimed (using Mandela’s Xhosa name). The Saudis were “stunned,” as they were convinced Mandela was Muslim. La Grange reflected that had it not been for her outburst, Mandela might have become the first Christian allowed into Islam’s holiest place.

Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who after his ambassadorship served as secretary-general of the National Security Council, director-general of the Saudi Intelligence Agency and King Abdullah’s special envoy, became an especially close friend. He was one of the small number of guests present when Mandela married his third wife, Graca Machel, on his 80th birthday in July, 1998. When Mandela’s son, Makgatho, died in 2005, the prince went to Mandela’s home in Houghton, Johannesburg, to convey his condolences in person. 

The prince publicly described Mandela as “not just the leader of Africa but of the whole world.”

Certainly, the relationship with Saudi Arabia had its practical aspects for both sides. 

In a speech in September 1997 at a banquet in Cape Town in honor of Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz, Mandela said: “The support that our liberation struggle enjoyed from Saudi Arabia, in particular, and the entire Arab world not only helped secure the defeat of apartheid but also gave us the chance to improve the lives of our people through our reconstruction and development program. 

“As we rebuild our country, the bonds with those who stood by us during the struggle for freedom are being strengthened.”  




Nelson Mandela with Cuban president Fidel Castro in 1991. (AFP/Getty Images)

Until then, South Africa relied on Iran for most of its oil. In November of that year, Saudi Arabia signed an agreement to boost crude exports to South Africa and build an oil refinery. Rumors swirled that the deal was a guns-for-oil barter: South African anti-aircraft guns and ammunition in exchange for Saudi oil.

The plight of the Palestinians affected Mandela deeply, not least because he saw parallels with how black people lived under apartheid. “We know too well that our freedom will be incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians,” he said.

He deplored what he called the “narrow, chauvinistic interest” of the Israeli government in stalling negotiations with the Palestinians, but he had no quarrel with the Jewish people. Many South African Jews had helped him in his early years and, according to some sources, Mandela advised Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat against unilaterally declaring a Palestinian state. 

In 2000, Arafat asked Mandela — by then no longer president — to mediate in talks with Israel. Mandela declined, but pledged instead to do what he could to get the peace talks started again.

Mandela’s influence was crucial in reaching an agreement between the US, UK and Libya over the prosecution of two Libyans accused of downing Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in December, 1988. Mandela proposed that Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi and Lamin Khalifah Fhimah be tried in a third country. All parties agreed and the trial, governed by Scottish law, went ahead in Camp Zeist in the Netherlands 

“It was, ultimately, as a result of Mandela’s intervention that the US, UK and Libya reached an agreement,” said Trew.

On Tuesday, the day before what would have been Mandela’s 100th birthday, the annual Mandela Day lecture in Johannesburg was given by former US president Barack Obama. 

Like Mandela, he was the first black man to lead his nation. Like Mandela, he, too, is a Nobel Peace Prize laureate. Obama also spoke at Mandela’s funeral in December, 2013.

The lecture was billed as “renewing the Mandela legacy and promoting active citizenship in a changing world.” 

It is a message still worth hearing and heeding.


What new technologies are revealing about the Silk Road’s forgotten landscapes

Updated 17 January 2026
Follow

What new technologies are revealing about the Silk Road’s forgotten landscapes

  • Drones and digital tools are allowing archaeologists to map vast areas in hours rather than months of ground surveys
  • In Saudi Arabia, aerial mapping has uncovered dense prehistoric and Bronze Age sites previously thought to be empty

DUBAI: Across the deserts and mountain valleys of the Arab world, drones are now doing work that once took teams of archaeologists months to complete.

In northern Saudi Arabia, for example, aerial surveys can map an entire ancient settlement in minutes, revealing faint outlines of walls, pathways and structures hidden beneath the surface.

These images are later turned into 3D models — part of a growing effort across the region to use technology to trace old trade routes, map forgotten sites and better understand how people once moved across Arabia and beyond.

Much of this work is connected to renewed interest in the Silk Road and the networks that once linked Arabia with the wider world.

Harrat, Khaybar. (Supplied)

The Silk Road refers to a network of ancient trade routes that linked East Asia with the Middle East, North Africa and Europe for more than 1,500 years.

Rather than a single road, it was a vast web of caravan paths and maritime corridors connecting cities from China and Central Asia to Iran, Iraq, the Arabian Peninsula, the Levant and the Mediterranean.

Along these routes, merchants, scholars and travelers exchanged goods such as silk, spices and metalwork, as well as ideas, technologies and cultural traditions that shaped the development of the wider region.

In more recent times, scholars, students and heritage authorities across the Middle East and Central Asia are increasingly relying on drones, laser scanning, photogrammetry and satellite analysis to document archaeological landscapes.

In Saudi Arabia’s AlUla and Khaybar regions — now considered some of the world’s densest concentrations of prehistoric and Bronze Age structures — drone surveys have helped researchers record sites that would otherwise remain inaccessible.

Dr. Hugh Thomas, a lecturer in archaeology at the University of Sydney and co-director of the Prehistoric AlUla and Khaybar Excavation Project, says the scale of the Saudi landscape makes aerial work essential.

“Saudi Arabia contains an exceptionally dense archaeological landscape distributed across a vast geographic area,” he told Arab News. “Drone-based surveys allow large volumes of archaeological data to be collected efficiently.” 

A Neolithic mustatil next to a Bronze Age pendant burial in Kaybar. (Supplied/Mat Dalton)

Indeed, many structures sit on steep or remote terrain that ground teams cannot easily reach. This shift to aerial archaeology has also revealed details that would be almost impossible to see from ground level.

Thomas notes that researchers have long suspected a link between water sources and Neolithic mustatil structures, which date back approximately 7,000 years. In 2020, drone images captured by his team near Khaybar also strengthened theories linking mustatil to water sources.

“The drone images revealed that recent rains had settled in specific parts of wadi valleys, exactly where the mustatil were built,” he said. Since then, multiple surveys and peer-reviewed studies have supported this connection, with many mustatil shown to point directly toward water.

In parallel, new technologies are reshaping how archaeologists understand the wider landscape. Thomas says tools such as drones, satellite imagery and 3D modelling allow researchers to document vast areas quickly and at far higher resolution than ever before.

These approaches “enable the rapid, cost-effective documentation of this vast and previously understudied landscape” and create permanent digital records that support long-term monitoring and analysis, he said.

This has been transformative for understanding past movement and land use.

Remote sensing work in northern Saudi Arabia has revealed extensive Bronze Age funerary avenues — pathways lined with monumental tombs, running for thousands of kilometers and linking major oases such as Khaybar, Al-Hait and Al-Huwayyitt.

Drone surveys and 3D models have allowed researchers to classify tomb types more accurately and identify where excavation would yield the most useful results. Thomas says these techniques directly contributed to one of the project’s most significant achievements.

“This has ultimately assisted us with our most recent paper, where we were able to publish the C14 dates of remains found in 40 Bronze Age tombs, helping us understand when these tombs appeared on the landscape and how they developed over time,” he said.

While international collaborations play a central role, Thomas says long-term progress in the Kingdom depends on building local capacity.

He says contributions from Saudi researchers, students and even members of the public are becoming increasingly important.

Archaeologist Don Boyer measures a tower of stones next to a 525m long Mustatil in Khaybar. (David Kennedy)

“Local researchers, students, and members of the public are taking photographs of archaeological sites and sharing them digitally,” he said. “Each image provides a lasting record of archaeological remains.”

In Saudi Arabia’s AlUla, one of the region’s most active archaeological hubs, the Royal Commission for AlUla has supported wide-ranging surveys that combine aerial photography, remote sensing and targeted excavation.

Published research from the AlUla and Khaybar Aerial Archaeology Project describes how thousands of structures — from ancient hunting traps to tombs and settlements — have been recorded using these methods in recent years.

“We’re seeing landscapes we did not even know existed before this kind of work began,” said archaeologist Dr. Rebecca Repper of the University of Sydney in an RCU briefing. 

“Technology is helping us reassess northern Arabia’s role in long-distance connections.”

Recent research across Central Asia shows how drones and LiDAR, a remote-sensing technology used to create extremely accurate 3D maps of landscapes, buildings, or buried features, are transforming the study of Silk Road-era landscapes.

In Uzbekistan, a team led by Dr. Michael Frachetti — an archaeologist at Washington University in St. Louis, who specializes in ancient mobility systems — used drone-mounted LiDAR to scan remote high-altitude terrain, revealing two previously undocumented medieval cities, Tugunbulak and Tashbulak.

Researchers excavate medieval pottery at the newly rediscovered medieval Silk Road city Tugunbulak located in the mountains of southeastern Uzbekistan June 8, 2022 (Michael Frachetti)

A 2024 peer-reviewed study, “Automated analysis of high-resolution lidar traces large-scale medieval urbanism in highland Central Asia,” details how these surveys exposed plazas, fortifications and settlement layouts previously invisible from the ground.

In southeast Kazakhstan, a 2021 study in the journal Applied Sciences shows how UAV photogrammetry helped map irrigation networks, settlement traces and burial mounds linked to medieval trade and pastoral routes.

Together, these findings demonstrate how high-resolution aerial mapping is reshaping our understanding of the landscapes and movement patterns that framed the Silk Road.

For governments, these discoveries are more than scientific. UNESCO describes the Silk Roads as a shared heritage space where cooperation is critical, and regional countries have increasingly embraced cross-border research partnerships.

In Saudi Arabia, AlUla’s collaborations with universities including Oxford, Bologna and the French National Centre for Scientific Research reflect a growing diplomatic interest in cultural research.

These partnerships have generated shared excavations, joint field schools and open-access databases — opportunities that were rare in the region two decades ago.

Digital access is also reshaping how the public engages with this history.

The International Dunhuang Project, a global consortium led by the British Library and multiple Asian national libraries, has digitized hundreds of thousands of manuscripts, murals and archaeological fragments linked to the Silk Road.

Its open platform has become a major educational resource for schools and researchers worldwide.

A LiDAR image of Tugunbulak shows a dense settlement along a ridge. (Michael Frachetti)

In AlUla, digital reconstructions and virtual models are increasingly used in classroom activities and community programs.

Youth involvement is part of this shift. In Saudi Arabia, RCU’s assorted heritage guardian programs introduce young people to survey techniques, basic archaeology and remote-sensing tools, helping train a new generation of community researchers.

In parts of Central Asia, student volunteers often support field surveys and digital documentation under national heritage ministries and international missions.

Across deserts, mountains and oasis towns, a fuller picture of ancient networks is beginning to emerge. Every drone flight reveals structures long buried under sand and stone.

“On the plateau, we found a hidden valley with large mounds and undulations on the surface,” Frachetti explained in a Washington University Magazine feature about his team’s drone-assisted work.

“It was obvious, both in person and on the drone-acquired surface model we created, that we had stumbled across something much larger and different from the typical campsite we had expected.”

Recent archaeological work has discovered a fortified 2.6-hectares Bronze Age town (al Natah) in Khaybar oasis (dating around 2400 BCE- 1300 BCE). (RCU)

Meanwhile, every 3D model helps trace how people once traveled, traded and settled across continents.

And every partnership — whether in AlUla, the Gulf, or Central Asia — reinforces the idea that this heritage connects far more than a single nation.

The Silk Road’s story is being rediscovered not through speculation but through data, satellites and the work of a generation that is documenting the past with new precision.