Turkish pressure sees Russia rescind PYD’s invitation to Syria talks

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands in Ankara in a file photo. (AP)
Updated 07 November 2017
Follow

Turkish pressure sees Russia rescind PYD’s invitation to Syria talks

ANKARA: Turkey’s objections to Russia’s decision to invite Syria’s main Kurdish political party to the proposed peace-talk congress scheduled for Nov. 18 in Sochi has led to the congress’ postponement. Russia has also reportedly ceded to Turkey’s demands that the Kurdish-led Democratic Union Party (PYD), and its armed affiliate, People’s Protection Units (YPG), take no part in the congress.
Turkey sees the PYD as an offshoot of the Kurdistan Workers Party, which it views as a terrorist organization for its decades-long insurgency in Turkey and Iraq.
Turkey’s presidential spokesperson Ibrahim Kalin announced on Sunday in an interview with Turkish broadcaster NTV that Turkey may send an observer to the talks as well.
“It’s not certain yet. But what Russia has informed us is that the meeting has been postponed and the PYD will not be invited,” he said.
Russia, Turkey and Iran are the three guarantor countries of the Russian-led Syria peace talks which have been running in tandem with UN-led peace talks in Geneva.
Oytun Orhan, an expert on Syria at Ankara-based think tank ORSAM, believes Iran and Syria may also have voiced concerns about the PYD taking part in the congress.
“As the fight with Daesh in Syria is approaching an end, the visions of Russia and regional countries over Syria’s future are diverging from each other,” Orhan told Arab News.
“Russia supports federalism in Syria, and claims the PYD should be included in the political settlement process. However, federalism is a red line for the three regional countries, and that might have pushed Russia to delay the congress,” he added. “The joint position of Turkey, Iran and Syria on the PYD and federalism might oblige Russia to shift closer to their stances.”
In October, Turkey launched a military operation in Syria’s Idlib province, which is largely controlled by HTS, a former Al-Qaeda affiliate. Turkish military set up observation points in Idlib under the Astana deal, brokered with Russia and Iran.
Turkey is desperate to ensure that its border with Syria — which runs from Afrin, next to Idlib, to the Mediterranean — is free from threats. Afrin is currently under the control of Kurdish YPG forces. And Russia currently has observer forces deployed in Afrin to ensure security.
Orhan says this situation could also be the cause of tension between Turkey and Russia.
“Turkey expects Russia to lift its protection over the YPG in Afrin, while Russia doesn’t wish to withdraw its support of Syrian Kurdish militias until Idlib is completely free of radical elements,” he said.
Russia, though, needs Turkish support on the ground to stabilize the situation in Idlib province, where the threat of attacks by militant groups still exists.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan will travel to Russia on Nov. 13, and is expected to meet his counterpart Vladimir Putin.
“Before this meeting, both parties can take steps to strengthen their bargaining power,” Orhan said. “However, as their mutual needs continue, they will have to abstain from taking steps that would end their cooperation.”


UPDATE 9-Iran foreign minister says progress made in nuclear talks with US in Geneva

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

UPDATE 9-Iran foreign minister says progress made in nuclear talks with US in Geneva

* Araqchi says progress made on the main guiding principles
* Iranian media say parts of Strait of Hormuz ‌to be temporarily closed
* The talks involved officials from both Iran and US
* US President Trump said he was involved indirectly

GENEVA: Iran and the United States reached an understanding on Tuesday on main “guiding principles” in talks aimed at resolving their longstanding nuclear dispute, but that does not mean a ​deal is imminent, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said.
Oil futures fell and the benchmark Brent crude contract tumbled more than 1 percent after Araqchi’s comments, which helped ease fears of conflict in the region, where the US has deployed a battle force to press Tehran for concessions.
“Different ideas have been presented, these ideas have been seriously discussed, ultimately we’ve been able to reach a general agreement on some guiding principles,” Araqchi told Iranian media after the talks concluded in Geneva.

BOTH SIDES HAVE ‘CLEAR NEXT STEPS’
The indirect discussions between US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, alongside Araqchi, were mediated by Oman. The White House did not respond to emailed questions about the meeting.
Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Al-Busaidi said in a post on X “much work is yet to be done” but Iran and the US were leaving with “clear ‌next steps” .
Just as ‌talks began on Tuesday, Iranian state media said Iran would temporarily shut part of the ​Strait ‌of ⁠Hormuz, a vital ​global ⁠oil supply route, due to “security precautions” while Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards conducted military drills there.
Tehran has in the past threatened to shut down the strait to commercial shipping if it is attacked, a move that would choke off a fifth of global oil flows and drive up crude prices.
Responding to comments by Trump that “regime change” in Iran might be the best course, the country’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, 86, warned that any US attempts to depose his government would fail.
“The US President says their army is the world’s strongest, but the strongest army in the world can sometimes be slapped so hard it cannot get up,” he said, in comments published by Iranian media.
Speaking at a disarmament conference in Geneva after the talks, Araqchi said ⁠that a “new window of opportunity” had opened and that he hoped discussions would lead to a “sustainable” solution ‌that ensured the full recognition of Iran’s legitimate rights.
Earlier, Trump said he himself would ‌be involved “indirectly” in the Geneva talks and that he believed Tehran wanted to make ​a deal.
“I don’t think they want the consequences of not making ‌a deal,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Monday. “We could have had a deal instead of sending the B-2s in ‌to knock out their nuclear potential. And we had to send the B-2s.”
The US joined Israel last June in bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. The US and Israel believe Iran aspires to build a nuclear weapon that could threaten Israel’s existence. Iran says its nuclear program is purely peaceful, even though it has enriched uranium far beyond the purity needed for power generation, and close to what is required for a bomb.

IRAN SAYS IT WILL ONLY DISCUSS NUCLEAR PROGRAMME
Since those ‌strikes, Iran’s Islamic rulers have been weakened by street protests, suppressed at a cost of thousands of lives, against a cost-of-living crisis driven in part by international sanctions that have strangled Iran’s oil ⁠income.
Washington has sought to expand ⁠the scope of talks to non-nuclear issues such as Iran’s missile stockpile. Tehran says it is willing only to discuss curbs on its nuclear program — in exchange for sanctions relief — and that it will not give up uranium enrichment completely or discuss its missile program.
Khamenei reiterated Iran’s position that its formidable missile stockpile is non-negotiable and missile type and range have nothing to do with the United States.
A senior Iranian official told Reuters on Tuesday the success of the Geneva talks hinged on the US not making unrealistic demands and on its seriousness on lifting the crippling sanctions on Iran.

US B-2 BOMBERS STRUCK NUCLEAR TARGETS
Tehran and Washington were scheduled to hold a sixth round of talks in June last year when Washington’s ally Israel launched a bombing campaign against Iran, and was then joined by US B-2 bombers that struck nuclear targets. Tehran has since said it has halted uranium enrichment activity.
Iran has joined the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which guarantees countries the right to pursue civilian nuclear power in return for requiring them to forgo atomic weapons and cooperate with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Israel, which has ​not signed the NPT, neither confirms nor denies having nuclear weapons, ​under a decades-old ambiguity policy designed to deter surrounding enemies. Scholars believe it does.