Psy: Wacky Korean singer who made YouTube history

Updated 26 November 2012
Follow

Psy: Wacky Korean singer who made YouTube history

Psy made his quirky debut in South Korea’s K-pop industry back in 2001 but it wasn’t until July that he began shooting to global fame with “Gangnam Style” — now the most-watched video of all time on YouTube.
A rare sense of humor and irony distinguished the chubby rapper, now 34, from his peers in the manufactured world of K-pop and made him an unlikely worldwide success.
As of yesterday “Gangnam Style” — whose wacky music and dance moves mock the hedonistic lifestyle of the upmarket southern Seoul neighborhood — had registered almost 814 million views in four months.
The video has inspired thousands of online imitations of Psy’s famous horse-ride dance, and flash mobs of tens of thousands in Paris, Rome and Milan.
The song peaked at number two on the US Billboard’s pop chart for seven weeks in a row after sweeping the charts in countries including Australia and Britain.
World figures swept up in the fever include UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, British Prime Minister David Cameron and US President Barack Obama, who either tried out the dance or marvelled at its popularity.
Psy, whose real name is Park Jae-Sang, gained the ultimate showbiz accolade by teaming up with Madonna in the pop diva’s concert and performing a special version of “Gangnam Style” with MC Hammer in the American Music Awards.
YouTube called the music video — which Saturday overtook Justin Bieber’s “Baby” in number of views — “a massive hit at a global level unlike anything we’ve ever seen before.”
Billboard.com noted it racked up the YouTube milestone in about four months compared to more than two years for “Baby,” calling it “nothing short of a pop culture phenomenon.”
Psy’s dramatic rise has been viewed with a mixture of pride and surprise in his home country, whose music industry has long been dominated by prettified, highly-manufactured girl and boy bands.
Having taken Asia by storm over the past decade with bubblegum hooks and dance moves staged with military precision, K-pop in recent years has garnered a small but growing fan base among teenagers in parts of Europe and America.
But none has come close to the worldwide popularity of the homely Psy.
“Psy is right at the opposite of our typical K-pop stars who are extremely preened and whose every single move is strictly dictated by their agent,” prominent music critic Kang Hun told AFP.
Humour, especially satire, is rare in the mainstream Korean music scene and that, coupled with Psy’s embrace of his anti-pop idol looks, has set him apart.
The singer, well known at home for his humorous and explosive stage performances, has long been a somewhat provocative figure in Korea.
He was once convicted in Seoul of smoking marijuana. In 2007 Psy was forced to serve a second period of compulsory military service after it was revealed that he had continued with his showbiz interests during his first two-year stint.
“Psy has long had very freewheeling, humorous and even provocative elements in his songs which are utterly lacking in most young K-pop singers,” Kang said.
“I think ‘Gangnam Style’ is a pinnacle of such a humorous, non-serious bad-boy style of his. And apparently people around the world can relate to his self-deprecating sense of humor.”
Psy himself says he invites laughter and not ridicule.
“My motto is to be funny, but not stupid,” he once said in an interview with Yonhap news agency.

It remains to be seen if “Gangnam Style” will prove anything more than a one-hit wonder. Psy is set to release a new album in English and Korean early next year which will be distributed globally.
But even if it takes off, it will be hard to replicate the success of “Gangnam Style,” said Han Koo-Hyun, the head of the Korean Wave Research Institute.
“His next song will be able to rack up at least hundreds of millions of views due to the popularity of ‘Gangnam Style’ but will never be more popular than ‘Gangnam Style’, said Han.
“This is too huge a success to accomplish twice.”


Why this year’s Golden Globes race feels so unpredictable

Updated 16 sec ago
Follow

Why this year’s Golden Globes race feels so unpredictable

  • No dominant frontrunner and openness among voters
  • ‘Hamnet,’ ‘Sinners,’ ‘Sentimental Value’ in contention

LOS ANGELES: With the Golden Globes approaching, this awards season has taken on an unusually fluid shape. Instead of a single dominant frontrunner, the race is being defined by range, taste, and a noticeable openness among voters.

Prestige dramas are sharing space with ambitious studio films, while several contenders have built momentum quietly rather than through aggressive campaigns. The result is a season that feels unpredictable — in the best possible way.

Recently announced presenters include a wide cross section of film, television, and music figures. (Supplied)

That sense of openness is reflected not only in the awards race itself, but also in the broader tone surrounding this year’s ceremony. The 83rd Annual Golden Globes will air live on CBS on Sunday, Jan. 11, 2026, with comedian and actress Nikki Glaser returning as host.

Recently announced presenters include a wide cross section of film, television, and music figures.

Among them are Julia Roberts, George Clooney, Jennifer Garner, Kevin Hart, Miley Cyrus, Snoop Dogg, Amanda Seyfried, Ana de Armas, Ayo Edebiri, Colman Domingo, Dakota Fanning, Kathryn Hahn, Queen Latifah, Zoe Kravitz, and Pamela Anderson.

The 83rd Annual Golden Globes will air live on CBS on Sunday, Jan. 11, 2026, with comedian and actress Nikki Glaser returning as host. (Supplied)

The diversity and generational range of the presenter lineup mirrors the season itself, blending established icons with contemporary voices and signaling a ceremony that leans into variety rather than predictability.

In the drama categories, “Hamnet” has emerged as a serious presence, earning steady respect across critics’ groups and industry conversations. Its restrained approach and emotional weight have resonated with audiences and awards watchers who value craft over spectacle.

At the same time, “Sinners” and “Sentimental Value” remain firmly in contention, particularly if voters gravitate toward character-driven storytelling rather than formal experimentation.

Among them are Julia Roberts, George Clooney, Jennifer Garner, Kevin Hart, Miley Cyrus, Snoop Dogg, Amanda Seyfried, Ana de Armas, Ayo Edebiri, Colman Domingo, Dakota Fanning, Kathryn Hahn, Queen Latifah, Zoe Kravitz, and Pamela Anderson. (Supplied)

On the musical or comedy side, “One Battle After Another” appears especially well-positioned, carried by strong ensemble work and a level of sustained buzz that has followed it throughout the season.

The acting races are no less competitive. Wagner Moura has placed himself near the front of the Best Actor, Drama conversation for his performance in “The Secret Agent,” a role widely praised for its restraint and complexity.

Michael B. Jordan continues to generate strong support for “Sinners,” reinforcing his position as a consistent awards presence.

In the musical or comedy field, Timothee Chalamet has become a frequent prediction for “Marty Supreme,” a performance many see as both charismatic and strategically timed.

The actress races are equally open, with Jessie Buckley and Rose Byrne widely cited as leading figures, while the supporting categories continue to spotlight standout work from Stellan Skarsgard and Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas.

In directing, momentum appears to favor Paul Thomas Anderson for “One Battle After Another,” reflecting both critical admiration and industry confidence.

Screenplay and score conversations have included “Sinners” and “KPop Demon Hunters,” underscoring a year that balances artistic ambition with broader appeal.

However the night ultimately unfolds, this year’s Golden Globes feels less about safe consensus choices and more about recognizing work that lingered long after the credits rolled.

From the nominees to the presenters taking the stage, the ceremony reflects a film year defined by confidence, creative risk, and a refreshing absence of certainty.