Chinese villagers struggle for heat as gas subsidies fade

A vendor waits for customers at a traditional market in a neighbourhood affected by the heating subsidy policy, in Baoding city, northern China's Hebei province. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 10 January 2026
Follow

Chinese villagers struggle for heat as gas subsidies fade

  • China’s central government allocated funds to refit stoves, but subsidies faded after three years and additional aid has drastically declined, local media reported this week

XUSHUI: Almost a decade after China began curbing coal burning to stop thick winter smog, villagers in northern Hebei province are struggling to afford their heating bills with most gas subsidies now phased out.
In 2017, Beijing mandated that dozens of northern areas wind down the use of coal-fired stoves in favor of electric and natural gas-powered systems.
China’s central government allocated funds to refit stoves, but subsidies faded after three years and additional aid has drastically declined, local media reported this week.
In Xushui, a district in Hebei roughly 100 kilometers (62 miles) outside Beijing, villagers told AFP they avoided turning on the heating because it drained their incomes.
“Regular folks can’t afford it... Spending 1,000 yuan ($143) per month on heat — no one can stand that,” a resident in his 60s told AFP at a farmers’ market.
“Everyone likes that (the air) is clean. There’s not one person that doesn’t like it,” he said, asking not to be named for fear of “trouble.”
“But... the cost of clean (air) is high,” he added.
On the clear, sunny day AFP visited, the warmest temperature was just under six degrees Celsius, with lows of minus seven.
Restaurant worker Yin Chunlan said that her elderly in-laws need to pay up to 7,000 yuan per year to heat their six-room village home.
Yin, 48, lives in an apartment in town and says her annual bill is a third of that.
“But it’s not the same in the village,” she told AFP.
“They have to set their heating much higher, and the temperature still isn’t as warm, so it wastes gas and wastes money.”
Yin’s in-laws often pile on extra blankets to stay warm.
“When I see it, it’s quite pitiful,” said Yin, wiping away a tear. “Nothing can be done.”
In one village, a woman in her 70s wore a green padded jacket underneath an apron as she crossed her outdoor courtyard.
Heating in her home is not turned on during the daytime, she said, showing AFP the system’s switchboard mounted above her stove displaying “off.”
The woman, who did not give her name, said the dial could reach 60C. When asked if the temperature inside could feel as warm, she laughed.

- Articles taken down -

Reports that villagers in Hebei were layering up under quilts to avoid costly heating peppered Chinese social media in the first week of the new year.
An article by Farmers’ Daily reshared in state media CCTV’s opinion section said in rural Hebei natural gas costs up to 3.4 yuan per cubic meter compared to 2.6 yuan in rural areas of Beijing.
Villagers told AFP they felt the huge price gap was unfair.
But the original article was quickly taken down, with republications, including the CCTV article, inaccessible days later.
China’s Ministry of Finance said in 2021 a total of 13.2 billion yuan in funds had been distributed for clean heating across Hebei.
But subsidies to support the installation of new systems and for gas bills, which had lasted three years, would not be renewed, it said in a letter.
The move came around the same time that international gas prices were driven up by Russia’s war in Ukraine. Last year, Chinese authorities reported national gas consumption growth had slowed.
The ministry, responding to a local proposal to increase financial support for provincial pollution control, said special funds would be arranged for additional subsidies in rural areas, but gave no details of the rollout.
A local Xushui government platform said in 2017 that some households would be eligible to receive 300 yuan in gas subsidies.
For villager Zhang Yanjun, that amount hardly made a dent in his bill of several thousand yuan per season.
The 55-year-old laborer said he had already spent more than 5,000 yuan on heating his home since October.
“If you give 300 or 200 yuan or something, it’s the same as if you gave no subsidies at all,” he said.


US judge orders curbs on immigration agents’ tactics toward Minnesota protesters

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

US judge orders curbs on immigration agents’ tactics toward Minnesota protesters

  • Arrests and tear-gassing of peaceful demonstrators prohibited
  • Observers also protected from arrests, crowd-control munitions
MINNEAPOLIS: A federal judge in Minnesota on Friday ordered that US immigration agents deployed en masse to Minneapolis be restricted in some of the tactics they have taken against peaceful demonstrators and observers, including arrests and tear-gassing.
Handing a victory to local activists in Minnesota’s most populous city, US District Judge Kate Menendez issued an injunction barring federal agents from retaliating against individuals engaged in non-violent, unobstructive protest activity.
The ruling was in response to a lawsuit filed against the US Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies on December 17, three weeks before an immigration agent fatally shot Renee Good, a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis, spawning waves of protests and putting the city on edge.
The court case was brought on behalf of six protesters and observers who claimed their constitutional rights had been infringed by the actions of ICE agents.
The ‌83-page order explicitly ‌prohibits federal officers from detaining people who are peacefully protesting or merely observing the ‌officers, ⁠unless there is ‌reasonable suspicion that they are interfering with law enforcement or have committed a crime.
Federal agents also are banned from using pepper spray, tear gas or other crowd-control munitions against peaceful demonstrators or bystanders observing and recording the immigration enforcement operations, the judge ruled.
Menendez wrote that the government, in defending the street tactics of its immigration officers, had failed to “explain why it is necessary for them to arrest and use force against peaceful observers.”
Stopping or detaining drivers and passengers in vehicles when there is no reason to believe they are forcibly obstructing or interfering with federal agents is likewise prohibited, according to the court ⁠order.
Order comes amid heightened tensions
“There may be ample suspicion to stop cars, and even arrest drivers, engaged in dangerous conduct while following immigration enforcement officers, but ‌that does not justify stops of cars not breaking the law,” Menendez ‍wrote.
The DHS did not immediately respond to a ‍Reuters request for comment.
The ruling comes nearly two weeks after the Trump administration announced it was sending 2,000 immigration ‍agents to the Minneapolis area, bolstering an earlier deployment in what the DHS called its largest such operation in history.
The surge in heavily armed officers from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency and Border Patrol has since grown to nearly 3,000, dwarfing the ranks of local police officers in the Twin Cities metropolitan area of Minneapolis and St. Paul.
Tensions over the deployment have mounted considerably since an ICE agent fatally shot Good, a mother of three, behind the wheel of her car on January 7.
At the time, Good was taking part in one of numerous neighborhood ⁠patrols organized by local activists to track and monitor ICE activities.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, one of the federal officials named in the lawsuit, said after the shooting that Good had been “stalking and impeding” ICE agents all day and had committed an act of “domestic terrorism” by trying to run over federal officers.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and local activists disputed Noem’s account, saying Good posed no physical threat to ICE agents. They pointed to video clips of the incident they said showed that Good was trying to drive her car away from officers and that the use of lethal force against her was unjustified.
Frey and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz have repeatedly demanded that the Trump administration withdraw the immigration agents, asserting that the operation is being conducted in a reckless manner endangering the public.
While largely siding with the plaintiffs in the case, the judge did not grant all their requests, declining to ban the federal government from actions not specifically taken against those who ‌filed suit. She also limited the injunction to officers deployed in the Twin Cities, rather than extending it statewide.