SYDNEY: Australia is expected to pass a law on Thursday making it easier to deport non-citizens to third countries, reviving criticism from human rights groups that it was “dumping” refugees in small island states and drawing comparisons with Trump policies.
As the United States seeks Pacific Island nations willing to accept deported non-citizens, Australia last Friday signed a deal with Nauru to resettle hundreds of people who have been denied refugee visas because of criminal convictions.
The planned new law removes procedural fairness when Australia deports a non-citizen to a third country and is designed to limit court appeals, said the government. It is expected to pass in Australia’s parliament after the opposition Liberal Party said it would support the move.
Australia will pay an upfront A$400 million to establish an endowment fund for the resettlement scheme, plus A$70 million a year in costs, Nauruan President David Adeang said in a budget speech last Friday.
Two-thirds of Nauru’s revenue last year, or A$200 million ($129.96 million), came from hosting an Australian-funded processing center for asylum seekers.
Nauru, which has a population of 12,000 and a land area of just 21 square km (eight square miles), is reliant on foreign aid, and faces a 2025 deadline to repay Taiwan A$43 million ($27.94 million) after switching diplomatic ties to Beijing, according to budget documents.
Under a decade-old policy to discourage people smuggling, Australia sends asylum seekers who arrive by boat to offshore detention centers to have refugee claims assessed, denying them Australian visas. The practice has been criticized by the United Nations Human Rights Committee.
The new Nauru resettlement scheme will cover a different group, whose visas were canceled by Australia because they served prison sentences or were refused visas on character grounds, and cannot return to countries including Iran, Myanmar and Iraq because of the risk of persecution.
Australia’s High Court ruled in 2023 that indefinite immigration detention was unlawful, resulting in around 350 non-citizens being released into the community, with a third subject to electronic monitoring.
One of this group, a 65-year-old Iraqi man, lost a High Court appeal against deportation to Nauru on Wednesday.
Law Council of Australia President Juliana Warner said on Wednesday the deportation law was “troubling” because it could put those sent to Nauru at risk of not receiving necessary health care, and is being rushed through parliament without adequate public scrutiny.
Several independent lawmakers said they were concerned it could be applied more widely than the 350 released by the High Court decision, with up to 80,000 people in the community without a visa.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke declined to comment on the 80,000 figure, and has said the law change is needed to maintain the integrity of the migration system.
The move was “absolutely Trump-like,” said Jana Favero, the deputy chief executive of the Asylum Seeker Resource Center.
Independent lawmaker Monique Ryan told parliament she was concerned stateless individuals and refugees who had never been convicted of a crime would be sent offshore without proper oversight, and Australia was “using a small island nation as a dumping ground.”
Australia moves to speed up third country deportation of non-citizens
https://arab.news/9te3q
Australia moves to speed up third country deportation of non-citizens
- The planned new law removes procedural fairness when Australia deports a non-citizen to a third country and is designed to limit court appeals, said the government
Terrorism arrests in UK surged by 660% after Palestine Action ban
- Support for proscribed group was made a terror offense by govt in July
- Extreme’ ban decision renders UK ‘an international outlier,’ says barrister
LONDON: Arrests for terrorism offenses in the UK have spiked by a massive 660 percent year-on-year due to support for Palestine Action, new government figures show.
The pro-Palestine group was listed as a terrorist organization and banned in July. Now any public demonstration of support for the group is outlawed, and hundreds of protesters — who have used the slogan “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action” — opposing the ban have been arrested in recent months, with the act now an offense under UK anti-terrorism legislation.
Of the 1,886 arrests in the year up to September for terrorism-related activity, 1,630 — or 86 percent — were linked to support for Palestine Action, government data released on Thursday shows.
In the previous year, 248 arrests were made in relation to incidents falling under anti-terrorism laws.
Among those arrested for supporting Palestine Action, protesters were 4.4 times more likely to be female, and were remarkably older, on average, than people typically arrested for alleged terror offenses.
The average age of those arrested in relation to Palestine Action was 57, compared to 30 among those arrested for all unrelated terror offenses.
Before the banning of Palestine Action, there were 63 arrests for terror-related activity between April and June this year.
Following the ban, the number of arrests within the category surged by 2,608 percent, with 1,706 arrests recorded from July to September.
The group’s proscription has been challenged in the High Court by co-founder Huda Ammori, whose barristers have argued that the ban’s impact was “dramatic, severe, widespread and potentially lifelong.”
Then-Home Secretary Yvette Cooper’s decision to ban the group was “novel and unprecedented,” Raza Husain KC told judges, adding: “This is the first direct action civil disobedience organization that does not advocate for violence ever to be proscribed as terrorism.”
The government’s decision in July was “so extreme as to render the UK an international outlier,” he said.
Cooper’s government body, the Home Office, was advised by the Foreign Office that Palestine Action’s “activity is largely viewed by international partners as activism and not extremism or terrorism.”
Representing the government, Sir James Eadie KC argued that Parliament reserved the right to decide what constitutes terrorism.
