UK government climbs down on welfare cuts in latest U-turn

Protesters hold placards as they take part in a ‘No More Austerity 2.0’ march in central London on June 7, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 27 June 2025
Follow

UK government climbs down on welfare cuts in latest U-turn

  • The climbdown is the third U-turn that UK leader Keith Starmer has been forced into in less than a month
  • Turnaround comes just before Starmer marks the first anniversary of what has been a rocky return to power for Labour

LONDON: The UK government backed down Friday on controversial plans to slash disability and sickness benefits after a major rebellion by MPs, in a blow to Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s authority.

The climbdown is the third U-turn that Starmer has been forced into in less than a month, leading to questions about his political acumen and direction of the ruling Labour party.

Only days after Starmer insisted he would plow ahead with the reforms, the government confirmed concessions had been made to 126 rebel MPs who had threatened to scupper the proposed changes.

The turnaround comes just before Starmer marks the first anniversary of what has been a rocky return to power for Labour after 14 years in opposition to the Conservatives.

A spokesperson for Number 10 said the government had “listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system.”

It said a revised package of measures would preserve the welfare system for those “who need it, by putting it on a sustainable footing.”

The backtrack means the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (Pip) Bill, which contains the welfare reforms, will likely make it through a parliamentary vote due on Tuesday.

“It’s always best to concede and then get it through in some way, shape or form. This is sort of damage limitation,” political scientist Steven Fielding said.

The concessions, due to be set out in parliament later on Friday, include a “staggered approach” to the reforms, care minister Stephen Kinnock said.

This means that the narrower eligibility criteria proposed will only apply to new claimants, not those already receiving the benefit payments.

Starmer’s government had hoped to make savings of £5.0 billion ($6.9 billion) as a result of the changes that have now been partly abandoned, meaning finance minister Rachel Reeves will need to find them elsewhere.

It has been a bumpy 12 months in office for Starmer during which Reeves has struggled to generate growth from a sluggish UK economy.

On June 9, the government declared it had reversed a policy to scrap a winter heating benefit for millions of pensioners, following widespread criticism, including from its own MPs.

Less than a week later Starmer announced a national enquiry focused on a UK child sex exploitation scandal that had attracted the attention of US billionaire Elon Musk.

Starmer had previously resisted calls for an enquiry into the so-called “grooming gangs” – that saw girls as young as 10 raped by groups of men mostly of South Asian origin – in favor of a series of local probes.

The prime minister has a massive majority of 165 MPs, meaning he should be able to force whatever legislation he wants through parliament.

But many of his own MPs complain of a disconnect between Starmer’s leadership, which is focused on combatting the rise of the far-right Reform UK party, and Labour’s traditional center-left principles.

“Labour is meant to stand for fairness, and those two flagship mistakes are all about being unfair,” Fielding said of winter fuel and the disability cuts.

The furors are also overshadowing Labour’s tightening of employment rights, and investment in housing and green industries, he added.

A YouGov poll of more than 10,000 Britons released this week found that while Labour is losing voters to Reform, it is also forfeiting supporters to the Liberal Democrats and the Greens on the left.

“They’ve been making so many unforced errors,” said Fielding, a politics professor at Nottingham University.

“I think there is now being a very reluctant recalibration of things.”


2025 among world’s three hottest years on record, WMO says

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

2025 among world’s three hottest years on record, WMO says

  • All eight datasets confirmed that the last three years were the planet’s three hottest since records began, the WMO said
  • The slight differences in the datasets’ rankings reflect their different methodologies and types of measurements

BRUSSELS: Last year was among the planet’s three warmest on record, the World Meteorological Organization said on Wednesday, as EU scientists also confirmed average temperatures have now exceeded 1.5 degrees Celsius of global warming for the longest since records began.
The WMO, which consolidates eight climate datasets from around the world, said six of them — including the European Union’s European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the British national weather service — had ranked 2025 as the third warmest, while two placed it as the second warmest in the 176-year record.
All eight datasets confirmed that the last three years were the planet’s three hottest since records began, the WMO said. The warmest year on record was 2024.

THREE-YEAR PERIOD ABOVE 1.5 C AVERAGE ⁠WARMING LEVEL
The slight differences in the datasets’ rankings reflect their different methodologies and types of measurements — which include satellite data and readings from weather stations.
ECMWF said 2025 also rounded out the first three-year period in which the average global temperature was 1.5 C above the pre-industrial era — the limit beyond which scientists expect global warming will unleash severe impacts, some of them irreversible.
“1.5 C is not a cliff edge. However, we know that every fraction of a degree matters, particularly for worsening extreme weather events,” said Samantha Burgess, strategic ⁠lead for climate at ECMWF.
Burgess said she expected 2026 to be among the planet’s five warmest years.

CHOICE OF HOW TO MANAGE TEMPERATURE OVERSHOOT
Governments pledged under the 2015 Paris Agreement to try to avoid exceeding 1.5 C of global warming, measured as a decades-long average temperature compared with pre-industrial temperatures.
But their failure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions means that target could now be breached before 2030 — a decade earlier than had been predicted when the Paris accord was signed in 2015, ECMWF said. “We are bound to pass it,” said Carlo Buontempo, director of the EU’s Copernicus Climate Change Service. “The choice we now have is how to best manage the inevitable overshoot and its consequences on societies and natural systems.”
Currently, the world’s long-term warming level is about 1.4 C above the pre-industrial era, ECMWF said. Measured on a short-term ⁠basis, average annual temperatures breached 1.5 C for the first time in 2024.

EXTREME WEATHER
Exceeding the long-term 1.5 C limit would lead to more extreme and widespread impacts, including hotter and longer heatwaves, and more powerful storms and floods. Already in 2025, wildfires in Europe produced the highest total emissions on record, while scientific studies confirmed specific weather events were made worse by climate change, including Hurricane Melissa in the Caribbean and monsoon rains in Pakistan which killed more than 1,000 people in floods.
Despite these worsening impacts, climate science is facing political pushback. US President Donald Trump, who has called climate change “the greatest con job,” last week withdrew from dozens of UN entities including the scientific Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
The long-established consensus among the world’s scientists is that climate change is real, mostly caused by humans, and getting worse. Its main cause is greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas, which trap heat in the atmosphere.