Netanyahu hoping for Trump’s triumph in US presidential race, say analysts

In a choice between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump for US president, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will likely be hoping that the man with whom he has a close relationship and who delivered multiple diplomatic victories for Israel, will triumph. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 27 October 2024
Follow

Netanyahu hoping for Trump’s triumph in US presidential race, say analysts

  • An isolationist, Trump as a Republican president might give Netanyahu more freedom to navigate the conflicts that continue to rage in Gaza and Lebanon
  • “His experience with Republicans is very good... unlike with the Democrats who are much tougher on him,” says former Netanyahu chief of staff

JERUSALEM: With the US presidential election heading into the home stretch, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will likely be hoping for Donald Trump to return to the White House.
Trump’s last time in office was good for Netanyahu, and in the lead-up to the November 5 vote, the former president has sent mixed messages on his Middle East policy.
His remarks have ranged from encouraging Netanyahu to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities — which Israel refrained from in its strikes Saturday — to criticizing the Israeli leader, saying “the October 7 attack would never have happened if I was president” and that he will pressure Israel to end the wars.
Yet it is these unclear policies, combined with Trump’s “make America great again” campaign slogan, that analysts say Netanyahu is hoping for.
An isolationist, Trump as a Republican president might give Netanyahu more freedom to navigate the conflicts that continue to rage in Gaza and Lebanon.
“One of Netanyahu’s milestones is the US election. He is praying for a Trump victory, which he thinks will give him a lot of freedom of movement, which will let him do what he aspires,” Gidon Rahat, political science professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told AFP.
Aviv Bushinsky, a political commentator and Netanyahu’s former chief of staff, similarly said: “His experience with Republicans is very good... unlike with the Democrats who are much tougher on him.”

Pro-Israel moves

In 17 years as prime minister, Netanyahu has only served opposite one Republican leader, Trump.
During his presidency, Trump went ahead with several moves that boosted Netanyahu’s domestic standing while upending some long-standing US policies on Israel, its conflict with the Palestinians and the wider region.
The Republican president moved the US embassy to Jerusalem, which Israel claims as its undivided capital, recognized Israeli sovereignty over the occupied Golan Heights, and oversaw the normalization of ties between three Arab states and Israel.
Trump also withdrew from a landmark nuclear deal with Israel’s arch-foe Iran and reimposed tough economic sanctions on the Islamic republic.
President Joe Biden, meanwhile, has long had a frosty relationship with Netanyahu despite insisting on his “ironclad support” for Israel.
Unlike Trump, Biden had warned Netanyahu against striking Iran’s oil production and nuclear facilities.
Trump and Netanyahu also enjoy a close personal relationship, with the former US president boasting this week of having had frequent phone calls with the Israeli premier.
“We have a very good relationship,” Trump said at a rally in Georgia. “We’re going to work with them very closely.”
Those positives will outweigh any concerns, said Bushinsky.
“I think Netanyahu would be willing to take the risk of Trump’s unpredictability,” he said.

Trump popular with Israeli public

Trump is popular not just with Netanyahu but with the Israeli public.
An opinion poll conducted in September by Mitvim, the Israel Institute for Regional Foreign Policies, said 68 percent of Israelis see Trump as the candidate who will best serve Israel’s interests.
Only 14 percent chose Vice President Kamala Harris, despite her repeatedly declaring her support for Israel and its right to defend itself.
“In Israel, more than any other liberal democracy outside the United States, Trump is more popular than Harris,” said Nadav Tamir, a former Israeli diplomat to the United States and a member of Mitvim’s board of directors.
A new Trump administration, though, could come with surprises, according to Tamir.
The former president has increasingly surrounded himself with Republicans “who are isolationists and don’t want America to be the leader of the free world or international alliances,” he said.

No better choice for Palestinians
Among Palestinians there is little enthusiasm for either candidate, said Khalil Shikaki, a Palestinian political scientist and pollster.
“Palestinians distrust both candidates and see little difference between them,” he said.
Taher Al-Nunu, a Hamas official, told AFP that he believed “successive US administrations have always been biased” toward Israel.
On the street, Palestinians said no matter who wins, life in their territories will not improve.
“I do not believe that the American elections will have a positive impact on our political reality,” said Leen Bassem, a 21-year-old student at Birzeit University in the occupied West Bank.
Hassan Anwar, 42, a sound engineer, also said he did not believe there was any difference, “because American policy is completely clear in its support and backing of Israel.”
 


UN slams world’s ‘apathy’ in launching aid appeal for 2026

Updated 08 December 2025
Follow

UN slams world’s ‘apathy’ in launching aid appeal for 2026

  • ‘Prioritized’ plan to raise at least $23 billion to help 87 million people in the world’s most dangerous places such as Gaza and Ukraine

UNITED NATIONS, United States:  The United Nations on Monday hit out at global “apathy” over widespread suffering as it launched its 2026 appeal for humanitarian assistance, which is limited in scope as aid operations confront major funding cuts.

“This is a time of brutality, impunity and indifference,” UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher told reporters, condemning “the ferocity and the intensity of the killing, the complete disregard for international law, horrific levels of sexual violence” he had seen on the ground in 2025.

“This is a time when the rules are in retreat, when the scaffolding of coexistence is under sustained attack, when our survival antennae have been numbed by distraction and corroded by apathy,” he said.

He said it was also a time “when politicians boast of cutting aid,” as he unveiled a streamlined plan to raise at least $23 billion to help 87 million people in the world’s most dangerous places such as Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan, Haiti and Myanmar.

The United Nations would like to ultimately raise $33 billion to help 135 million people in 2026 — but is painfully aware that its overall goal may be difficult to reach, given US President Donald Trump’s slashing of foreign aid.

Fletcher said the “highly prioritized appeal” was “based on excruciating life-and-death choices,” adding that he hoped Washington would see the choices made, and the reforms undertaken to improve aid efficiency, and choose to “renew that commitment” to help.

The world body estimates that 240 million people in conflict zones, suffering from epidemics, or victims of natural disasters and climate change are in need of emergency aid.

‘Lowest in a decade’

In 2025, the UN’s appeal for more than $45 billion was only funded to the $12 billion mark — the lowest in a decade, the world body said.

That only allowed it to help 98 million people, 25 million fewer than the year before.

According to UN data, the United States remains the top humanitarian aid donor in the world, but that amount fell dramatically in 2025 to $2.7 billion, down from $11 billion in 2024.

Atop the list of priorities for 2026 are Gaza and the West Bank.

The UN is asking for $4.1 billion for the occupied Palestinian territories, in order to provide assistance to three million people.

Another country with urgent need is Sudan, where deadly conflict has displaced millions: the UN is hoping to collect $2.9 billion to help 20 million people.

In Tawila, where residents of Sudan’s western city of El-Fasher fled ethnically targeted violence, Fletcher said he met a young mother who saw her husband and child murdered.

She fled, with the malnourished baby of her slain neighbors along what he called “the most dangerous road in the world” to Tawila.

Men “attacked her, raped her, broke her leg, and yet something kept her going through the horror and the brutality,” he said.

“Does anyone, wherever you come from, whatever you believe, however you vote, not think that we should be there for her?”

The United Nations will ask member states top open their government coffers over the next 87 days — one day for each million people who need assistance.

And if the UN comes up short, Fletcher predicts it will widen the campaign, appealing to civil society, the corporate world and everyday people who he says are drowning in disinformation suggesting their tax dollars are all going abroad.

“We’re asking for only just over one percent of what the world is spending on arms and defense right now,” Fletcher said.

“I’m not asking people to choose between a hospital in Brooklyn and a hospital in Kandahar — I’m asking the world to spend less on defense and more on humanitarian support.”