Explainer: After French election no party has a majority, so what comes next?

1 / 2
Anti-riot police officers received a molotov cocktail during a demonstration following the announcement of the first results of the second round of France’s crunch legislative elections in Nantes, western France on July 7, 2024. (AFP)
2 / 2
People gather in front of "Le triomphe de la Republique" statue in Paris on July 7, 2024, during an election night rally following the first results of the second round of France's legislative election. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 July 2024
Follow

Explainer: After French election no party has a majority, so what comes next?

  • With all three major blocs falling short of 289 needed to secure an outright majority, none of them can form a majority government and would need support from others to pass legislation

Here’s what may come next after France’s election on Sunday looked set to produce a hung parliament, with a leftist alliance in the lead but without a absolute majority.

What happened in Sunday’s second round vote?
The left-wing New Popular Front alliance was on track to win the biggest number of seats, according to pollsters’ projected results, but it will fall short of the 289 needed to secure an outright majority in the lower house.
The outcome delivers a stinging defeat to the far-right National Rally (RN) party, which had been projected to win the vote but suffered after the NFP and President Emmanuel Macron’s Together bloc worked together between the first and second rounds of voting to create an anti-RN vote.
Projections showed the RN finishing third, behind Together.
It means none of the three blocs can form a majority government and would need support from others to pass legislation.

Will a left-leaning coalition form?
This is far from certain.
France is not accustomed to the kind of post-election coalition-building that is common in northern European parliamentary democracies like Germany or the Netherlands.
Its Fifth Republic was designed in 1958 by war hero Charles de Gaulle to give large, stable parliamentary majorities to presidents and that has created a confrontational political culture with no tradition of consensus and compromises.
Moderate leftwing politician Raphael Glucksmann, a lawmaker in the European Parliament, said the political class would have to “act like grown-ups.”
Jean-Luc Melenchon, leader of the hard-left France Unbowed (LFI), ruled out a broad coalition of parties of different stripes. He said Macron had a duty to call on the leftist alliance to rule.
In the centrist camp, Macron’s party head, Stephane Sejourne, said he was ready to work with mainstream parties but ruled out any deal with Melenchon’s LFI. Former Prime Minister Edouard Philippe also ruled out any deal with the hard-left party.
Macron himself said he will wait for the new assembly to have found some “structure” to decide his next move.

What if no agreement can be found?
That would be uncharted territory for France. The constitution says Macron cannot call new parliamentary elections for another 12 months.
Prime Minister Gabriel Attal said he would tender his resignation to Macron on Monday morning, but that he was available to act in a care-taker capacity.
The constitution says Macron decides who to ask to form a government. But whoever he picks faces a confidence vote in the National Assembly, which will convene for 15 days on July 18. This means Macron needs to name someone acceptable to a majority of lawmakers.
Macron will likely be hoping to peel off Socialists and Greens from the leftist alliance, isolating France Unbowed, to form a center-left coalition with his own bloc.
However, there was no sign of an imminent break-up of the New Popular Front at this stage.
Another possibility is a government of technocrats that would manage day-to-day affairs but not oversee structural changes.
It was not clear the left-wing bloc would support this scenario, which would still require the backing of parliament.


Spain urges EU to create joint army amid Greenland dispute

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Spain urges EU to create joint army amid Greenland dispute

  • EU should integrate defense industry and assemble coalition of the willing, Spain foreign minister says
  • Joint EU military more efficient than separate national forces, Albares says

ZURICH: Spain is urging the EU to move toward creating a joint army for the bloc as a deterrence measure, Spain’s Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares said in comments to Reuters on Wednesday ahead of a day of meetings in Davos.
The region should focus first on bringing together its tangible assets to properly integrate ‌its defense ‌industry, and then mobilizing a coalition of ‌the ⁠willing, ​the foreign ‌minister said.
The concern over whether European citizens would be willing to assemble militarily is a “legitimate debate”, but the chance of assembling a critical mass was higher as a bloc than on a national level, Albares said, adding: “A joint effort would be more efficient than 27 separate national armies.”
The comments come ahead of an emergency meeting between EU leaders later on Thursday ⁠in Brussels to coordinate a joint response to US President Trump’s threats to buy ‌or annex Greenland. A Council spokesperson confirmed late ‍on Wednesday the meeting will still ‍take place despite Trump’s announcement on social media that he and ‍NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte had “formed the framework of a deal”.
Albares, speaking after a meeting in Delhi on Wednesday with his Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar which included talks on deeper defense ties, stressed that the intention of such ​an army was not to replace NATO, underscoring the importance of the transatlantic alliance.
“But we need to demonstrate that ⁠Europe is not a place that will let itself be coerced militarily or economically,” Albares said.
His position remained unchanged despite Trump rowing back on his Greenland threats after speaking to Rutte, a senior foreign official said, adding that Spain was “glad a pathway for dialogue had been opened within the NATO framework, if that pathway is confirmed.”
The concept of integrating national military forces into a supranational European army was first proposed in 1951 to counter the Soviet Union and ensure German rearmament did not threaten its neighbors, but was voted down by France’s parliament in 1954.
“The idea of ‌European defense was part of the origin of the EU. It is up to my generation to finish this task,” Albares said.