Biden’s Gaza plan ‘not a good deal’ but Israel accepts it— Netanyahu’s aide

Palestinians use a road lined with destroyed buildings at Al-Bureij camp in the central Gaza Strip on June 2, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 03 June 2024
Follow

Biden’s Gaza plan ‘not a good deal’ but Israel accepts it— Netanyahu’s aide

  • Ophir Falk, Netanyahu’s chief foreign policy adviser, says “a lot of details to be worked out”
  • First phase of the Gaza plan entails a truce and the return of some hostages held by Hamas

JERUSALEM: An aide to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed on Sunday that Israel had accepted a framework deal for winding down the Gaza war now being advanced by US President Joe Biden, though he described it as flawed and in need of much more work.
In an interview with Britain’s Sunday Times, Ophir Falk, chief foreign policy adviser to Netanyahu, said Biden’s proposal was “a deal we agreed to — it’s not a good deal but we dearly want the hostages released, all of them.”

“There are a lot of details to be worked out,” he said, adding that Israeli conditions, including “the release of the hostages and the destruction of Hamas as a genocidal terrorist organization” have not changed.

Israel battled and bombarded Hamas in the Gaza Strip on Sunday as mediators called on both sides to agree to a truce and hostage release deal outlined by Biden.

Biden, whose initial lockstep support for Israel’s offensive has given way to open censure of the operation’s high civilian death toll, on Friday aired what he described as a three-phase plan submitted by the Netanyahu government to end the war.

The first phase entails a truce and the return of some hostages held by Hamas, after which the sides would negotiate on an open-ended cessation of hostilities for a second phase in which remaining live captives would go free, Biden said.

That sequencing appears to imply that Hamas would continue to play a role in incremental arrangements mediated by Egypt and Qatar — a potential clash with Israel’s determination to resume the campaign to eliminate the Iranian-backed Islamist group.

Biden has hailed several ceasefire proposals over the past several months, each with similar frameworks to the one he outlined on Friday, all of which collapsed. In February he said Israel had agreed to halt fighting by Ramadan, the Muslim holy month that began on March 10. No such truce materialized.

The primary sticking point has been Israel’s insistence that it would discuss only temporary pauses to fighting until Hamas is destroyed. Hamas, which shows no sign of stepping aside, says it will free hostages only under a path to a permanent end to the war.

In his speech, Biden said his latest proposal “creates a better ‘day after’ in Gaza without Hamas in power.” He did not elaborate on how this would be achieved, and acknowledged that “there are a number of details to negotiate to move from phase one to phase two.”

Falk reiterated Netanyahu’s position that “there will not be a permanent ceasefire until all our objectives are met.”

Netanyahu is under pressure to keep his coalition government intact. Two far-right partners have threatened to bolt in protest at any deal they deem to spare Hamas. A centrist partner, ex-general Benny Gantz, wants the deal considered.

Hamas has provisionally welcomed the Biden initiative.

“Biden’s speech included positive ideas, but we want this to materialize within the framework of a comprehensive agreement that meets our demands,” senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan told Al Jazeera on Saturday.

Hamas wants a guaranteed end to the Gaza offensive, withdrawal of all invading forces, free movement for Palestinians and reconstruction aid.

Israeli officials have rejected that as an effective return to the situation in place before Oct. 7, when Hamas, committed to Israel’s destruction, ruled Gaza.

In the ensuing Israeli assault that has laid waste to much of the impoverished and besieged coastal enclave, more than 36,000 Palestinians have been killed, Gaza medical officials say.


What 2026 holds for Sudan as conflict drags on and famine deepens

Updated 19 sec ago
Follow

What 2026 holds for Sudan as conflict drags on and famine deepens

  • Hopes after Khartoum’s recapture dimmed as El-Fasher fell to RSF atrocities and ceasefire efforts stalled
  • Armed factions consolidated control over different regions, splitting the country and prolonging the fighting

LONDON: When the Sudanese Armed Forces recaptured Khartoum from the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces in late March, soldiers and many of the capital’s remaining residents took to the streets to celebrate.

The RSF, which seized the city soon after the civil war erupted in April 2023, had ruled with an iron fist. When its fighters were finally dislodged, much of the population was glad to see the back of them.

There was even hope that the army’s victory could mark a turning point in the conflict, setting in train a series of events that would lead to an end to the fighting. Such optimism, however, looked misplaced as the rest of the world welcomed 2026.

Seven months after the SAF had reclaimed Khartoum, RSF fighters unleashed a fresh wave of violence against the population of another city, El-Fasher, 800 kilometers away on the other side of the country.

The RSF’s capture of North Darfur’s capital and the days of bloodletting that followed marked one of the darkest chapters in Sudan’s history.

Fighters carried out mass executions, torture and rapes reminiscent of the 2003-05 genocide inflicted on Darfur by the Janjaweed — the predecessor of the RSF.

Far from being the year when Sudan’s fortunes began to turn, 2025 will likely be remembered as the year when the vast nation, already bifurcated by the independence of South Sudan in 2011, was split once more, this time between a SAF-controlled east and a RSF-dominated west.

The International Crisis Group recently warned that the war “could settle into a prolonged stalemate that will morph into a durable partition.”

“Neighboring countries fear that such a failed-state scenario would spell even more long-term instability that spills beyond Sudan’s borders,” the think-tank added.

El-Fasher was the SAF’s last holdout in Darfur. Its strategic significance was reflected in the RSF’s brutal 18-month siege to break the city.

When the group finally succeeded on Oct. 26, it consolidated its hold over Darfur and cemented the dividing line running through the middle of Sudan.

The RSF now controls most of western Sudan and large areas of the Kordofan region.

The SAF, meanwhile, controls the central areas around Khartoum, the north and the east, including Port Sudan on the Red Sea coast.

Kordofan, a vast agricultural area made up of three states and home to the nation’s oil fields, has now become the focus of the fighting.

The violence there has escalated in recent weeks, with hundreds of civilians killed since late October, according to the UN.

On Dec. 4, a children’s nursery and a hospital in Kalogi were hit by a drone strike, killing 114 people including 63 children.

Another drone strike on Dec. 13 killed six Bangladeshi UN peacekeepers, who had been deployed to South Kordofan to oversee disputed territory between Sudan and South Sudan.

Sudan’s largest oil field, Heglig, which is located near the border and supplies both countries, has now fallen to the RSF.

Kordofan is also strategically significant because it spans the supply lines to the west of the country.

With the world’s gaze distracted by Gaza and Ukraine, Sudan’s humanitarian crisis continued to spiral in 2025.

UN agencies say the conflict is now the world’s largest humanitarian crisis and largest displacement crisis, while the International Rescue Committee describes it as the largest humanitarian crisis ever recorded.

Tens of thousands of people have been killed, more than 12 million displaced, and 30 million — two thirds of the population — are in need of aid. Half the population faces acute hunger. Areas of Darfur and Kordofan are already in the grip of famine.

“We’re really looking at the most devastating war in Sudan’s history,” Ahmed Soliman, senior research fellow at Chatham House, said in a recent podcast. “It’s shocking and globally the worst humanitarian crisis without a doubt.”

Speaking shortly after the fall of El-Fasher, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said the conflict was “spiraling out of control.”

But the conflict had spiraled long before the horror of the RSF’s onslaught. El-Fasher just represented a sickening nadir.

About 260,000 people were trapped in El-Fasher when it was finally overrun. The RSF had recently completed an earth barrier encircling the city to block people from leaving.

The group’s fighters videoed themselves gunning down residents both in the city and as they tried to flee.

In one incident, more than 460 men, women and children at the Saudi Maternity Hospital were massacred.

Satellite images analyzed by the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab showed pools of blood on the ground and piles of bodies in the hospital car park.

Victims and witnesses recounted sickening acts of brutality and sexual violence.

One woman told Amnesty International that she had tried to flee the Abu Shouk neighborhood with her five children and a group of neighbors but were stopped by RSF fighters.

Both she and her 14-year-old daughter were raped. Her daughter died a few days later after reaching a clinic outside the city.

A 34-year-old man told the human rights monitor that he was among a group of 20 men who had managed to cross the earth berm but were caught by RSF fighters.

They were forced to lie down before the gunmen opened fire, killing 17 of them.

“The RSF were killing people as if they were flies,” he said. “It was a massacre. None of the people killed that I have seen were armed soldiers.”

The International Criminal Court said last month it was taking immediate steps to preserve and collect evidence related to the El-Fasher atrocities for use in future prosecutions.

Even before El-Fasher, the RSF had been widely accused of carrying out war crimes and crimes against humanity, with the US government determining that the group had committed acts of ethnic cleansing and genocide.

The shocking images that emerged from El-Fasher have given new impetus to international efforts to try to end the conflict.

The war stems from the aftermath of the downfall of President Omar Bashir amid mass protests against his rule.

After the civilian aspect of a power sharing agreement was shut out of the transitional process in 2021, a power struggle emerged between SAF commander Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan and RSF chief Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo.

The rivalry eventually led to the outbreak of war in April 2023.

Since El-Fasher fell, the “Quad” group of mediators of Saudi Arabia, the US, Egypt and the UAE have intensified efforts to secure a ceasefire and a peace settlement.

During his visit to Washington last month, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman encouraged US President Donald Trump to help bring the conflict to an end.

The RSF has said it would agree to the Quad’s roadmap, which includes an initial three-month humanitarian truce leading to a permanent ceasefire and transition to civilian rule.

On Dec. 16, Al-Burhan declared he was ready to work with the Trump administration to resolve the conflict.

For those suffering in Sudan’s conflict zones, it is a faint glimmer of hope after a year of unfathomable suffering.

Whether 2026 will see a change in the fortunes of Sudanese, only time will tell.