Ukraine strikes may have hit 15% of Russian refinery capacity — NATO official

Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries may have disrupted more than 15 percent of Russian capacity, a NATO official said on Thursday, adding that the alliance believed Moscow still lacked sufficient munitions and manpower to launch a successful offensive. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 05 April 2024
Follow

Ukraine strikes may have hit 15% of Russian refinery capacity — NATO official

  • “In terms of damage, the strikes have probably disrupted more than 10 percent of Russia’s refinery capacity, maybe more than 15 percent,” the official said
  • Around 14 percent of Russia’s refining capacity has been shut down by drone attacks

BRUSSELS: Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries may have disrupted more than 15 percent of Russian capacity, a NATO official said on Thursday, adding that the alliance believed Moscow still lacked sufficient munitions and manpower to launch a successful offensive.
Russia and Ukraine have both used drones to strike critical infrastructure, military installations and troop concentrations in their more than two-year-old war, with Kyiv hitting Russian refineries and energy facilities in recent months with some strikes entering 1,000 km (620 miles) into Russian territory.
“In terms of damage, the strikes have probably disrupted more than 10 percent of Russia’s refinery capacity, maybe more than 15 percent. Depending on the extent of the damage, repairs could take considerable time,” the official told reporters on condition of anonymity.
“Fewer and fewer of these types of Russian energy, critical infrastructure...are safe from potential strikes,” the official said.
According to Reuters calculations, around 14 percent of Russia’s refining capacity has been shut down by drone attacks.
Damaged Russian refineries will get back to normal operations by early June, Russian Energy Minister Nikolai Shulginov said, quoted by Interfax news agency.

HEAVY LOSSES
The NATO official said Russia was recruiting about 30,000 people a month to absorb heavy losses, but that while it maintained a significant advantage over Ukraine in terms of munitions, manpower and equipment, it was unlikely to accomplish any major breakthrough in the immediate term.
“They’re likely to be unable to mount any mount any significant offensive operation without another large-scale mobilization,” the official said, adding that Moscow also had to handle its own munitions’ shortages.
Russia has stepped its attacks on civilian infrastructure in recent weeks and a drone attack on Thursday struck residential buildings in the city of Kharkiv and an energy facility in the surrounding region, killing several people and severing power for 350,000 residents, Ukrainian officials said.
The official said Moscow was likely to ramp up such strikes as it sought to degrade Ukraine’s air defense capabilities.
At a NATO foreign ministers meeting in Brussels on Thursday, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba pleaded for alliance to free up available Patriot air defense systems.
“We expect they will likely continue to advance missile and drone strike packages to penetrate Ukrainian air defenses and place pressure on Ukrainian air defense deployments, underlining the criticality of our aid for these systems to protect the Ukrainian facilities,” the NATO official said.
Moscow has turned to its allies, notably North Korea and Iran, to provide it with more weapons, including ballistic missiles.
When asked whether NATO had seen the transfer of Iranian ballistic missiles to Russia, the official said the alliance did not have that they had yet, but expected Tehran to go through with the transfer once mutual beneficial terms were agreed between the two sides.
“Iran has indicted it intends to do so and that it will ship ballistic missiles to Russia and we have no reason to believe they won’t follow through on that,” the official said.
Iran has denied already providing ballistic missiles to Russia after Reuters reported that it had provided Moscow with a large number of powerful surface-to-surface ballistic weapons, deepening military cooperation between the two US-sanctioned nations.


About 400 immigrant children were detained longer than the recommended limit, ICE admits

Updated 8 sec ago
Follow

About 400 immigrant children were detained longer than the recommended limit, ICE admits

  • A Dec. 1 report from ICE indicated that about 400 immigrant children were held in custody for more than the 20-day limit during the reporting period from August to September
  • Advocates documented injuries suffered by children and a lack of access to sufficient medical care

TEXAS, USA: Hundreds of immigrant children across the nation were detained for longer than the legal limit this summer, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement has admitted in a court filing, alarming legal advocates who say the government is failing to safeguard children.
In a court filing Monday evening, attorneys for detainees highlighted the government’s own admissions to longer custody times for immigrant children, unsanitary conditions reported by families and monitors at federal facilities, and a renewed reliance on hotels for detention.
The reports were filed as part of an ongoing civil lawsuit launched in 1985 that led to the creation of the 1990s cornerstone policy known as the Flores Settlement Agreement, which limits the time children can spend in federal custody and requires them to be kept in safe and sanitary conditions. The Trump administration is attempting to end the agreement.
A Dec. 1 report from ICE indicated that about 400 immigrant children were held in custody for more than the 20-day limit during the reporting period from August to September. They also told the court the problem was widespread and not specific to a region or facility. The primary factors that prolonged their release were categorized into three groups: transportation delays, medical needs, and legal processing.
Legal advocates for the children contended those reasons do not prove lawful justifications for the delays in their release. They also cited examples that far exceeded the 20-day limit, including five children who were held for 168 days earlier this year.
ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Hotel use for temporary detention is allowed by the federal court for up to 72 hours, but attorneys questioned the government’s data, which they believe did not fully explain why children were held longer than three days in hotel rooms.
Conditions at the detention facilities continued to be an ongoing concern since the family detention site in Dilley, Texas, reopened this year.
Advocates documented injuries suffered by children and a lack of access to sufficient medical care. One child bleeding from an eye injury wasn’t seen by medical staff for two days. Another child’s foot was broken when a member of the staff dropped a volleyball net pole, according to the court filing. “Medical staff told one family whose child got food poisoning to only return if the child vomited eight times,” the advocates wrote in their response.
“Children get diarrhea, heartburn, stomach aches, and they give them food that literally has worms in it,” one person with a family staying at the facility in Dilley wrote in a declaration submitted to the court.
Chief US District Judge Dolly Gee of the Central District of California is scheduled to have a hearing on the reports next week, where she could decide if the court needs to intervene.