UK minister for veterans ordered to name sources accusing SAS forces of executing Afghans

Britain's Minister of State for Veterans’ Affairs Johnny Mercer at 10 Downing Street in London. (AFP/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 23 March 2024
Follow

UK minister for veterans ordered to name sources accusing SAS forces of executing Afghans

  • John Mercer receives support for his stance from former head of the army

LONDON: A judge has ordered the British minister for veterans to name sources who have accused members of the UK’s Special Air Service of carrying out executions of Afghans, including children.

John Mercer was served with a notice this week which compels him to name the whistleblowers or face up to 51 weeks in prison for failing to comply, The Telegraph reported on Friday.

Mercer last month told an inquiry set up to investigate the accusations that he had listened to “horrific” stories from former members of the Afghan special forces about the alleged executions.

He added that the accounts given to him included allegations that SAS members executed detainees, including minors, who were restrained and posed no threat. There was “no reason why a person under control should lose their life,” he said.

Mercer has so far ignored the request, according to Friday’s report, and would be in contempt of the inquiry and face jail or a fine if he continues to do so.

He has received support for protecting the identities of soldiers, and the former head of the British Army described the issuing of the notice to Mercer as “outrageous.”

Gen. Lord Dannatt said: “It is outrageous that the government minister who has done more than anyone else for veterans should be threatened with jail. He gave his word to the whistleblowers that their identity would be protected. The information that they gave Mr. Mercer has already been passed by him to the inquiry.”

Dannatt added: “He sees this as a matter of public interest. He wants future whistleblowers to be assured they can speak to figures of authority in confidence.”

Mercer told the inquiry in February that he was frustrated with the Ministry of Defense for not adequately investigating the allegations, and accused officials at the ministry of misleading him about the availability of evidence, specifically full-motion video footage from the operations in question.

Mercer said: “I don’t disguise the fact that I am angry with these people. The fact that I’m sitting here today is because those people, with their rank and privileges, have not done their job.”


‘No country and no community’ should be left behind in digital transformation, Estonia’s president tells WGS

Updated 12 sec ago
Follow

‘No country and no community’ should be left behind in digital transformation, Estonia’s president tells WGS

  • Russia’s aggression against Ukraine shows cyberspace as frontline of conflict, says Alar Karis
  • AI must be made to understand and interpret principles embedded in the UN charter

DUBAI: Estonia believes that “no country and no community” should be left behind in digital transformation, the country’s President Alar Karis said at the World Governments Summit on Wednesday.

“That is why we actively support international corporation through initiatives … Our aim is to help countries build secure, inclusive, and interoperable digital public infrastructure.

“Our digital footprint has reached some 150 countries,” Karis said in his address at the gathering.

In today’s geopolitical environment, digital systems are no longer mere infrastructure, they are strategic assets and targets, he noted.

Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, has clearly shown that cyberspace is now a frontline of conflict, according to Karis.

“Which means embedding cybersecurity, resilience, and legal accountability into every digital and AI project from the very beginning. Security is not a constraint on innovation; it is our foundation of trust and long-term sustainability.”

He stressed that Estonia has already demonstrated this practice publicly in identifying malicious cyber operations, enforcing accountability, and the application of international law in cyberspace.

“We have all witnessed rising tension and manifestations of brutality around the world. We must take care to ensure that AI is not affected by these developments … that is rightly understand what is good and bad, what is right and wrong,” said Karis.

He said that AI should be made to understand and interpret the principles embedded in the UN charter, which include territorial integrity, sovereignty, peaceful settlement of disputes, the right to self-defense, human rights, dignity, and international law.

Karis said that this should be done in “the same way that the founding fathers understood it and member states understand it today.”

He warned of ending up in a situation where force, justifications, explanations and malicious interpretations “earn sneaking victory and become perfectly reasonable to their masses.”

“This should not happen and indeed should be avoided,” he cautioned.

“This is an extremely important task for us. Steps to that end have already been taken by the United Nations.

“At the end of the year, the General Assembly established a global dialogue on AI governance which provides an inclusive platform … the thing the UN for states and stakeholders to discuss critical AI issues facing humanity today,” he said.

Estonia is honored to have been nominated together with El Salvador to co-facilitate this process, said Karis who assured that they will do so with great dedication.

Estonia’s ambition was not simply to run faster in the digital race, but to design better governance for AI here by serving as a trusted testing ground.

The country wants to place education and innovation at the heart of transformation, and anchor technology in democratic values and international law.

Karis added: “Estonia is often described as being at the forefront of digital governance and of establishing a vibrant startup ecosystem.

“Today 100 percent of our government services are online, allowing citizens and businesses to interact with the state securely, transparently, and at any time.”

“We have introduced the one-only principle. Citizens provide the data just once, and government agencies reuse it securely. Every citizen can see which official has accessed which of their records when and why,” he added.