Protests by lawmakers block approval of bill granting blanket powers to Pakistani spy agencies

A general view of Parliament House building in Islamabad, Pakistan, on April 27, 2018. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 02 August 2023
Follow

Protests by lawmakers block approval of bill granting blanket powers to Pakistani spy agencies

  • Bill recommends three-year jail term for anyone found guilty of disclosing intelligence official’s identity
  • Under the law, intelligence agencies will have power to enter and search a person or place without a warrant

ISLAMABAD: Protests by legislators in the upper house of parliament on Wednesday blocked the approval of a controversial law proposed by the government that grants near-blanket powers to top intelligence agencies, including to enter and search a person or place without a warrant.

The Official Secrets (Amendment) Bill, 2023 is being widely seen to be aimed at stifling criticism of military-backed spy chiefs and agents. The attempt to hastily pass the law by the government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, whose term expires this month, comes amid growing criticism of military and intelligence officers by former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his aides. 

The bill is expected to pass the Senate this week and then go to President Arif Alvi to be signed into law. The law was quietly tabled in the lower house of parliament on Tuesday and approved despite protests from the opposition benches.

On Wednesday, Federal Law Minister Azam Nazir Tarar tabled the bill in Senate for approval, but lawmakers from across the treasury and opposition benches protested against it, after which Senate Chairman Sadiq Sanjrani referred the bill to the relevant standing committee of the house for discussion.

The Official Secrets (Amendment) Bill, 2023 proposes sweeping powers for two premier intelligence agencies, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Intelligence Bureau (IB), making it legal for them to raid and detain any citizen and seize any document, sketch, plan, electronic or modern devices or anything which can be evidence of an offence committed.

“The intelligence agencies may, at any time, enter and search any person or place, without warrant, and if necessary, by use of force, and seize any document, sketch, plan, article, note,” the bill says.

The proposed legislation has also broadened the definition of “document” to include “any written, unwritten, electronic, digital, or any other tangible or intangible instrument” related to the military’s procurements and capabilities.

Likewise, the definition of “enemy” introduced in the proposed law states: 

“Any person who is directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally working for or engaged with a foreign power, foreign agent, non-state actor, organisation, entity, association or group guilty of a particular act… prejudicial to the safety and interest of Pakistan.”

Another amendment in the bill proposes a prison term of three years for disclosing the “identity of the members of the intelligence agencies or the informants or sources.” 

It also terms a visit of a Pakistani citizen to the address of a foreign agent within or outside Pakistan as an offence.

The proposed law empowers the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and officials of intelligence agencies to investigate suspects for violation of the Official Secrets Act.

Advocate Taimur Malik warned the proposed legislation could be used to curtail civil liberties and constitutional rights.

“The legislation may be enacted with a good will to protect the national interests, but the chances of its misuse seem to be massive,” Malik told Arab News. “Such legislations are not passed in functional democracies.”

He said the legislation would have “serious implications” in the absence of checks and balances on the working of intelligence officials.

“If they are allowed to enter a premise or detain anybody without warrant, then at least they should have approval from the highest level to avoid any misuse of authority,” Malik added.

Advocate Abdul Moiz Jaferii said the proposed legislation on intelligence officials was an attempt to give legal cover to spy agencies operating with impunity.

“If the past of our agencies is anything to go by, then there are serious concerns of these powers being abused by the same agencies,” Jaferii told Arab News.

The Sharif government has tabled a number of controversial bills in parliament in the last week, raising alarm among legal experts and human rights activists over why bills related to civil liberties have been passed without requisite debate in parliament.

The recently-passed Army Act (Amendment) Bill proposes up to five years in jail for disclosing sensitive information and two years for ridiculing or scandalising the armed forces. It also bars military officials posted on sensitive duties from entering politics for five years after retirement.

Last month, amendments to the Elections Act granted additional powers to the caretaker government to take important decisions and engage with international institutions.

Last week parliament also passed a contempt of parliament bill proposing six months jail or one million rupees fine or both for those found guilty by a parliamentary committee of contempt of the parliament.

On Monday, the Senate dropped a controversial Prevention of Violent Extremism Bill after opposition by lawmakers. The bill had proposed a ten-year jail term with two million rupees in fines.


Pakistan says Afghanistan has created conditions ‘similar to or worse than’ pre-9/11 attacks

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan says Afghanistan has created conditions ‘similar to or worse than’ pre-9/11 attacks

  • The statement followed a suicide blast at a mosque in Islamabad that killed over 30, injured 169
  • Pakistan frequently accuses the Afghan Taliban of backing militants, an allegation denied by Kabul

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s president has warned that the Taliban’s government in Afghanistan has created conditions “similar to or worse than” those before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, a sign of rising tensions with Kabul after last week’s mosque attack in Islamabad, which analysts said Monday highlights militants’ reach to the capital.

Asif Ali Zardari made the remarks while thanking the international community for condemning Friday’s suicide bombing at a Shiite mosque that killed 31 worshippers and wounded 169. Without directly blaming India, Zardari also said Pakistan’s eastern neighbor was “assisting the Taliban regime and threatening not only Pakistan but regional and global peace.”

In a statement issued Sunday, Zardari said Pakistan “takes strong exception to the situation in Afghanistan where the Taliban regime has created conditions similar to or worse than pre-9/11, when terror organizations posed threats to global peace.” He added that Pakistan had long maintained terrorism cannot be confronted by any single country in isolation.

The unusually strong comments were likely to irk Kabul and New Delhi, both of which have condemned the suicide attack claimed by Daesh (Islamic State) and have denied any involvement.

The previous Afghan Taliban government, which ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001, had been blamed for sheltering the Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden who was behind the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks that killed more than 3,000 people in the United States. The Afghan Taliban also allowed Al-Qaeda to operate training camps within Afghanistan, despite international warnings. However, bin Laden was killed during a US commando operation in Pakistan in May 2011.

Last week, Afghanistan’s Defense Ministry and New Delhi, in separate statements, rejected the Pakistani allegations, saying Islamabad had irresponsibly linked them to the attack.

Pakistan frequently accuses the Afghan Taliban, who returned to power in August 2021 in Afghanistan, of backing militants including the Pakistani Taliban, known as Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Both deny the accusations.

There was no immediate response from India or Afghanistan to Zardari’s latest allegations, which came after Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi said the bomber involved in the attack was a Pakistani and trained by Daesh in Afghanistan.

Naqvi said security forces had arrested four suspects, including an Afghan national accused of links to the militant group and of helping mastermind the attack. The detainees included the bomber’s mother and brother-in-law, according to officials who said investigations into the attack were still ongoing.

Pakistan has not shared full details about the involvement of the bomber’s family, however.

On Monday, Naqvi received telephone calls from his Italian counterpart Matteo Piantedosi and European Commissioner Magnus Brunner, who condemned the mosque attack. According to a government statement, Naqvi maintained that “Pakistan is a shield for the world against terrorism and emphasized that strong global-level measures are needed today to protect the world from terrorism”.

Asif Durrani, Pakistan’s former special representative for Afghanistan, said Zardari’s warning was “unambiguous: terrorism thrives where it is tolerated, facilitated, or used as a proxy.”

He wrote on X that “allowing terrorist groups to operate from Afghan soil and India’s use of proxies to destabilize Pakistan is a dangerous path with grave regional and global consequences.” Durrani added, “Peace demands responsibility, not denial.”

Another Islamabad-based analyst, Abdullah Khan, said the preliminary findings into the mosque bombing suggest the attack may reflect a pattern seen in some IS attacks involving close family networks. He said the IS affiliates have at times recruited entire families, pointing to past attacks in Pakistan and Indonesia.

Although Islamabad has seen fewer attacks than some other regions, Pakistan has experienced a recent rise in militant violence, much of it attributed to Baloch separatist groups and the TTP, which is separate from but allied with Afghanistan’s Taliban.

Daesh’s regional affiliate, a major Taliban rival, has carried out attacks across Afghanistan.