UN adopts Pakistan-backed resolution condemning desecration of religious symbols, holy books

Iraqis raise copies of the holy Qur’an during a protest in Baghdad, Iraq, on July 22, 2023. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 26 July 2023
Follow

UN adopts Pakistan-backed resolution condemning desecration of religious symbols, holy books

  • Presented by Morocco, the resolution won approval in the 193-member UN General Assembly on Tuesday
  • It strongly deplored ‘all acts of violence’ against people on the basis of their faith or targeting religious symbols

ISLAMABAD: The United Nations General Assembly this week adopted a resolution, co-sponsored by Pakistan, to counter hate speech and condemn attacks on places of worship, religious symbols, and holy books, as rightwing protesters set copies of the Holy Qur’an on fire in Denmark, Pakistan’s state-owned news agency reported Wednesday.

In the latest incident, a group of anti-Islam activists desecrated the Islamic scripture outside the Egyptian and Turkish embassies in Copenhagen after similar demonstrations in Sweden enraged Muslims in the last few weeks.

Such recent incidents have also prompted leaders of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), a 57-member group of Muslim nations, to come together and demand European nations to prevent and prosecute such anti-religious acts.

“The resolution titled ‘Promoting interreligious and intercultural dialogue and tolerance in countering hate speech’, won the approval in the 193-member Assembly amid growing acts of desecration of the holy Qur’an,” the Associated Press of Pakistan (APP) reported, adding the resolution was presented by Morocco and backed by Pakistan.

“Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of their religion or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their religious symbols, holy books, homes, businesses, properties, schools, cultural centers or places of worship, as well as all attacks on and in religious places, sites and shrines in violation of international law,” said the text of the resolution APP reported.

Pakistan’s Mission Counsellor Bilal Chaudhry, expressing his “profound satisfaction” over the adoption of the resolution, said the text resonated with the resolution on religious hatred, presented by Pakistan on behalf of the OIC, recently adopted at the Human Rights Council in Geneva.

That landmark resolution condemned “all advocacy and manifestations of religious hatred, including recent public and premeditated acts that have desecrated the Qur’an” and called for countries to adopt laws enabling them to bring to justice those responsible for such acts, he pointed out.

“Islamophobia is on the rise, with the repeated incidents of desecration of the Holy Qur’an,” Chaudhry said. “These acts are not just a provocation to the feelings of more than two billion Muslims in the world, but a step to sabotage interfaith harmony and peace.”

“Such incidents are also a manifestation of racial hatred and xenophobia, and absence of preventive legal deterrence, inaction, and shying away from speaking out encourages further incitement to hatred and violence.”

The Pakistani official at the UN mission said the text of the resolution did not seek to curtail the right to free speech but tried to underline the “special duties and responsibilities” of the international community to safeguard interfaith peace and harmony.”

A day earlier, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also called upon governments and faith leaders across the world to “put an end to such abhorrent practices.”

“Let us not allow a handful of misguided and evil people to hurt the emotions of billions of people,” he wrote in a Twitter post.

The PM added the latest incidents of Qur’an burning had left Muslims around the world “deeply anguished” and those in Pakistan in “deep pain and distress.”

“The recurring pattern of these abominable and Satanic incidents has a sinister design: to hurt the inter-faith relations, damage peace and harmony and promote religious hatred and Islamophobia,” he added.

Separately, Pakistan’s foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari spoke to the OIC secretary general, Hissein Brahim Taha, over the phone on Monday to condemn the anti-Islam protests in European states.

Bhutto-Zardari commended the OIC for holding an emergency ministerial meeting over the issue. Taha appreciated Pakistan’s efforts to combat and counter Islamophobia, said a statement by the foreign ministry.

“The Foreign Minister assured the Secretary-General that Pakistan stood ready to actively participate in all OIC initiatives to arrest the reprehensible tide of Islamophobia,” it added.


Walnut tree remains ‘under arrest’ for over a century, living symbol of colonial power in Pakistan

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Walnut tree remains ‘under arrest’ for over a century, living symbol of colonial power in Pakistan

  • British officer is said to have ordered chaining of the tree in 1898, a reminder of the absolute authority and psychological control enforced under colonial rule in Khyber Pass region
  • Locals and historians say the shackled tree survives as a physical memory of the Frontier Crimes Regulation era, when even nature could be punished to discipline subjects and display power

LANDI KOTAL, KHYBER: In the military cantonment of Landi Kotal, close to Pakistan’s Torkham border crossing with Afghanistan and the mouth of the historic Khyber Pass, a single walnut tree stands bound in heavy iron chains.

It has been this way for more than a century, a surreal, almost absurd monument to the power structures and punitive imagination of the British Empire’s rule in the tribal frontier.

Black shackles still brace parts of its branches, giving it the appearance of a theatrical installation. To locals, it is a wound that never fully healed, a reminder that even nature could be punished when authority wished to show dominance.

Local oral histories trace the origin of this bizarre imprisonment to 1898, when a British officer named James Squid, allegedly intoxicated, believed the tree was moving toward him and instantly ordered it arrested. Soldiers carried out the instruction and the walnut tree has never been freed since.

Muhammad Sardar, the caretaker who oversees the site today, recounted the story as it has been passed down for generations.

“This British military official at that time was drunk and thought this walnut tree was moving toward him to attack him,” he told Arab News. “The officer ordered to arrest this tree, hence the soldiers had to obey the order and arrest this tree.”

Whether the event unfolded exactly as described is impossible to verify, but historians and residents agree on what the continued chaining represented: the unquestionable authority of colonial power.

A LAW THAT COULD BIND PEOPLE — AND TREES

Landi Kotal was one of the most militarized points of the British-controlled frontier, a strategic chokepoint along the Khyber Pass, a route armies, traders and empires have used for thousands of years. To control the region, the British introduced the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR), a law that denied locals the right to appeal, hire lawyers or challenge government decisions. Entire tribes could be punished for the suspected action of one member.

The chained walnut tree is often interpreted as a physical embodiment of that era: a warning made visible.

Dr. Syed Waqar Ali Shah, Assistant Professor of History at the University of Peshawar, said the symbolism was deliberate.

“It was an assertion of their [British] authority, it was a symbol of their power. Right. It’s a funny thing as well, because it’s something which was under the influence of some intoxication,” he explained.

“The officer behaved or gave orders for the imprisonment of that particular tree under the influence of some intoxicants.”

Dr. Shah continued:

“It was something which was a symbol of colonial authority, assertion of their authority, of bureaucratic diplomacy, a symbol of their bureaucratic strength and power, and maybe some cultural encounter as well.”

He added that such displays endured because “it was a cultural link between the locals and the colonial power. So it was a reflection of that. But later on, they continued with it in the presence of FCR (Frontier Crimes Regulation) and regulations like this.”

Even once the officer sobered, the chains remained.

Dr. Shah believes that was intentional: psychological messaging meant to instill conformity and fear in people living under colonial law.

“Their objective and purpose was to make it a symbol of discipline for the masses. It was an exhibition of power, a sheer exhibition of power, a symbol that if we can do this to something which was inhuman … if they can deal with a tree like this, so the general public, they should be aware that discipline is very important.”

Landi Kotal’s older residents say their fathers and grandfathers retold the story long before Pakistan existed and long before independence movements dismantled the Raj.

Usman Khan Shinwari, a 26-year-old shopkeeper, said the story continues to live in households like a family inheritance.

“My grandfather would often narrate this story of the arrested tree,” he recalled. “My grandfather would say that it shows how the then rulers were treating the locals and what our ancestors had endured.”

Over a century later, long after the end of British rule and the formal abolition of the Frontier Crimes Regulation in 2018, the walnut tree remains exactly where it was chained, part spectacle, part scar.

Tourists sometimes come to photograph it. Others stand silently before it.

But for many in Khyber, it is neither attraction nor curiosity.

It is proof that power once flowed one way only. A tree could be punished, so people learned not to resist.