Sudanese actress Asia Abdelmajid reportedly killed in Sudanese crossfire

Short Url
Updated 04 May 2023
Follow

Sudanese actress Asia Abdelmajid reportedly killed in Sudanese crossfire

  • Actress was killed under unclear circumstances at her home in north Khartoum
  • Abdelmajid was regarded as the first Sudanese professional actress

LONDON: Popular Sudanese actress Asia Abdelmajid was reported killed in a crossfire in Sudan’s capital Khartoum on Wednesday.

The circumstances surrounding her death in her home during clashes in the suburb of Bahri remain unclear, as fighting between the Sudanese army and Rapid Support Forces continues.

According to several sources, RSF forces have stationed themselves in residential areas across the city, carrying out ground attacks. The Sudanese army, which has access to jet fighters, often attacks from the sky instead.

The RSF claimed on Wednesday that the Sudanese army had deployed the police’s special forces unit, but they successfully resisted the attack.

Abdelmajid’s family announced her death on Wednesday. Due to dangerous circumstances, they were forced to bury her in the nearby kindergarten where she had been working.

Abdelmajid, who turned 80 last year, was famous for her theater performances and first came to prominence in the 1965 production of the play “Pamseeka.”

The widow of Sudan’s acclaimed poet Mohamed Moftah Al-Faitory, she was regarded as a pioneer of the stage and became the country’s first professional stage actress before retiring to become a teacher.

“Pamseeka” was put on at the national theater in Omdurman to mark the anniversary of Sudan’s first revolution.

Despite a ceasefire agreement, fighting continues to rage in many parts of Khartoum. The International Committee of the Red Cross reported on Thursday that the country is close to collapse, with water and electricity infrastructure severely damaged and the health sector hard hit.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called on the warring factions to stop the fighting immediately.


‘AI race is on’: Saudi minister at Davos stresses need for global optionality

Updated 27 min 2 sec ago
Follow

‘AI race is on’: Saudi minister at Davos stresses need for global optionality

  • Minister of Investment Khalid Al-Falih said ‘we don’t know who’s going to be ahead in the next few years’ and the Kingdom therefore reserves the right for optionality
  • On Tuesday, the WEF announced the first phase of a Digital Embassy Framework aimed at bringing greater clarity and consistency

DAVOS: Saudi Minister of Investment Khalid Al-Falih told Davos that the artificial intelligence “race is on,” with the Kingdom determined to use its diplomatic reach while preserving strategic “optionality.”

Speaking on Tuesday’s “AI Power Play, No Referees” panel at the World Economic Forum, Al-Falih described AI as “truly the transformation of this century,” but warned that it will soon be commoditized and not monopolized by any single company or country.

He stressed the need for global diffusion, saying: “The essence of AI’s power is that it has to be accessible. So the word ‘diffusion’ is not just within economies that have to compete, but I believe it has to be done globally.”

While acknowledging the US lead, Al-Falih said optionality is critical. “We don’t know who’s going to be ahead four or five years from now,” he said, adding that the Kingdom reserves the right for optionality amid shifting dynamics.

Riyadh has emerged as a global AI player, buoyed by its huge Davos delegation and heavy investments in technology and supporting infrastructure. Low energy costs — a factor that has driven human development worldwide — position Saudi Arabia uniquely, Al-Falih said, with renewables poised to power AI data centers as part of the Kingdom’s diversification strategy.

“We know this is not just about infrastructure, data center and the energy competitive advantage that we believe Saudi Arabia has is second to none. We’re investing across the technology stack, in applications and LLMs and in connectivity, because we believe that this is going to be a global good. Just as important as building the data hub that Saudi Arabia is building, we need to be connected, and we are connected to Europe, Asia, because we want that data, that AI power, to be transmitted across borders and across economies.”

Saudi Arabia, while strategically aligned with the US, has also backed Chinese, Korean and Japanese companies to maintain flexibility. “Optionality is very important. It’s something we have now, and we protect because we believe that we are the owners of our own destiny, and we will not let go of that.”

On Tuesday, the WEF announced the first phase of a Digital Embassy Framework aimed at bringing greater clarity and consistency to how trusted digital embassies are designed and governed worldwide.

Also known as “data embassies,” the initiative seeks to address practical challenges in cross-border sovereign AI infrastructure and data hosting, with an emphasis on trust, security and governance, and is expected to be formally launched at the forum’s meeting in Jeddah in April.

The initiative was announced during a separate panel titled “Digital Embassies for Sovereign AI” at the forum’s annual meeting on Tuesday, featuring Gobind Singh Deo, minister of digital for Malaysia and Alexandre Fasel, state secretary for foreign affairs of Switzerland.

Fasel said the value of such a global framework lies in preventing countries from having to start from scratch each time they negotiate bilateral arrangements. By setting out shared principles and approaches, spanning technical, legal and governance issues, the framework can provide common reference points for countries seeking to establish such entities, even if the term “digital embassy” itself remains imperfect.

Both speakers acknowledged that the term can be a misnomer, since it suggests traditional diplomatic arrangements. The focus, they said, is the function: allowing data and computing to be hosted abroad while maintaining safeguards around sovereignty, access and control.

Deo said the concept is driven by practical realities, as some countries lack the energy and water needed to support large-scale data centers, even though those resources are available elsewhere.

Hosting infrastructure in better-resourced countries can offer a solution, he said, provided robust safeguards are in place to ensure data is secure and that access and control stay with the originating state.

Saudi Arabia has already moved early on the concept. In April 2025, it published a draft Global AI Hub Law — described as the first G20 attempt to set out a comprehensive legal framework that embraces the “digital embassy” approach.

A key question at Davos this year is how a state can maintain data sovereignty — and apply its laws to certain categories of data - when that data must be hosted in a foreign jurisdiction.

Al-Falih said policy work on data sovereignty — from regulation and platforms to data centers — began well before the recent acceleration in AI. 

“But in addition to data privacy, we had an open data we talked about diffusion and access to compute, but access to data to achieve the same purpose of research, drug discovery, productivity improvement, having a policy also of open access to data was a pillar that was launched before Covid.”

In an earlier panel, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said predicting exactly when AI will match a Nobel Laureate’s capabilities in multiple fields remains difficult due to internal and external factors, but said that “something fast is going to happen.”

“AI is going to be incredibly powerful. It’s just a question of exactly when. And because it’s incredibly powerful, it will do all these wonderful things, will help us cure cancer, it may help us to eradicate tropical diseases, it will help us understand the universe. But there are these immense and grave risks that we need to think about and we need to address them.”

Amodei said tackling those risks requires action on several fronts: “It’s a mixture of things that we individually need to do as leaders of the companies, and that we can do working together. And then there’s going to need to be some role for wider societal institutions, like the government.

“If we are all working together, we can address, we can learn through science to properly control and direct these creations that we’re building. But if we build them poorly, if we’re all racing and we go so fast that there’s no guardrails, then I think there is risk of something going wrong.”