New UK asylum policy threatens Afghan lives: ex-interpreter
New UK asylum policy threatens Afghan lives: ex-interpreter/node/2265401/world
New UK asylum policy threatens Afghan lives: ex-interpreter
Above, BF Hurricane arrives in Dover carrying migrants picked up in the English Channel on Oct. 18, 2022. The UK government’s proposal would see migrants choosing the cross-channel route lose any right to claim asylum. (AFP file photo)
New UK asylum policy threatens Afghan lives: ex-interpreter
Rafi Hottak, who served with British Army, says many of his colleagues remain trapped in Afghanistan
UK government figures suggest over 71,000 Afghan asylum applications remain pending
Updated 09 March 2023
Arab News
LONDON: Proposals by the UK government to toughen its stance on migrants will risk the lives of Afghans who worked with the British Army, a former interpreter has warned.
Rafi Hottak, 36, who was wounded in an explosion while helping British soldiers fighting the Taliban in Helmand province, told Metro newspaper that many of his former colleagues would suffer as a result of new laws that would make entering the UK by small boat across the English Channel illegal.
The proposals, laid out by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, would see migrants choosing the cross-channel route lose any right to claim asylum in the UK, and make them liable for swift deportation.
Hottak, who came to the UK in 2011 after receiving threats from the Taliban, said many others like him remain in Afghanistan hiding from the group, which swept to power following the withdrawal of US-led coalition forces in August 2021.
“We are losing precious lives every day and most of them are people who have served the NATO forces in Afghanistan,” Hottak said.
“If the existing schemes do not include them, they are forced to flee the country and claim asylum.
“Now, if asylum routes are closed, it means the UK government is taking their fundamental human right away and telling them, ‘I will not save your life even if you have served the NATO forces and I would rather you are killed by the terrorist Taliban’.”
The UK has welcomed over 21,000 Afghans via two schemes since the Taliban returned to power. However, at least 4,300 people with leave to travel to the UK remain stuck in Afghanistan.
According to Ministry of Defence figures, over 71,000 applications made by Afghans to claim asylum in Britain have not been processed.
Iran warns US troops and Israel will be targets if America strikes over protests as death toll rises
Updated 4 sec ago
DUBAI: Nationwide protests challenging Iran’s theocracy saw protesters flood the streets in the country’s capital and its second-largest city into Sunday, crossing the two-week mark as violence surrounding the demonstrations has killed at least 116 people, activists said. With the Internet down in Iran and phone lines cut off, gauging the demonstrations from abroad has grown more difficult. But the death toll in the protests has grown, while 2,600 others have been detained, according to the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency. Meanwhile, Iran’s parliament speaker warned the US military and Israel would be “legitimate targets” if America strikes the Islamic Republic, as threatened by President Donald Trump. Qalibaf made the threat as lawmakers rushed the dais in the Iranian parliament, shouting: “Death to America!” Those abroad fear the information blackout will embolden hard-liners within Iran’s security services to launch a bloody crackdown, despite warnings from Trump he’s willing to strike the Islamic Republic to protect peaceful demonstrators. Trump offered support for the protesters, saying on social media that “Iran is looking at FREEDOM, perhaps like never before. The USA stands ready to help!!!” The New York Times and Wall Street Journal, citing anonymous US officials, said on Saturday night that Trump had been given military options for a strike on Iran, but hadn’t made a final decision. The State Department separately warned: “Do not play games with President Trump. When he says he’ll do something, he means it.” Parliament rallies Iranian state television broadcast the parliament session live. Qalibaf, a hard-liner who has run for the presidency in the past, gave a speech applauding police and Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, particularly its all-volunteer Basij, for having “stood firm” during the protests. “The people of Iran should know that we will deal with them in the most severe way and punish those who are arrested,” Qalibaf said. He went on to directly threaten Israel, “the occupied territory” as he referred to it, and the US military, possibly with a preemptive strike. “In the event of an attack on Iran, both the occupied territory and all American military centers, bases and ships in the region will be our legitimate targets,” Qalibaf said. “We do not consider ourselves limited to reacting after the action and will act based on any objective signs of a threat.” It remains unclear just how serious Iran is about launching a strike, particularly after seeing its air defenses destroyed during the 12-day war in June with Israel. Any decision to go to war would rest with Iran’s 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The US military has said in the Mideast it is “postured with forces that span the full range of combat capability to defend our forces, our partners and allies and US interests.” Protests in Tehran and Mashhad Online videos sent out of Iran, likely using Starlink satellite transmitters, purportedly showed demonstrators gathering in northern Tehran’s Punak neighborhood. There, it appeared authorities shut off streets, with protesters waving their lit mobile phones. Others banged metal while fireworks went off. Other footage purportedly showed demonstrators peacefully marching down a street and others honking their car horns on the street. In Mashhad, Iran’s second-largest city, some 725 kilometers (450 miles) northeast of Tehran, footage purported to show protesters confronting security forces. Flaming debris and dumpsters could be seen in the street, blocking the road. Mashhad is home to the Imam Reza shrine, the holiest in Shiite Islam, making the protests there carry heavy significance for the country’s theocracy. Protests also appeared to happen in Kerman, 800 kilometers (500 miles) southeast of Tehran. Iranian state television on Sunday morning took a page from demonstrators, having their correspondents appear on streets in several cities to show calm areas with a date stamp shown on screen. Tehran and Mashhad were not included. They also showed pro-government demonstrations in Qom and Qazvin. Khamenei has signaled a coming clampdown, despite US warnings. Tehran escalated its threats Saturday, with Iran’s attorney general, Mohammad Movahedi Azad, warning that anyone taking part in protests will be considered an “enemy of God,” a death-penalty charge. The statement carried by Iranian state television said even those who “helped rioters” would face the charge. More demonstrations planned Sunday Iran’s theocracy cut off the nation from the Internet and international telephone calls on Thursday, though it allowed some state-owned and semiofficial media to publish. Qatar’s state-funded Al Jazeera news network reported live from Iran, but they appeared to be the only major foreign outlet able to work. Iran’s exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, who called for protests Thursday and Friday, asked in his latest message for demonstrators to take to the streets Saturday and Sunday. He urged protesters to carry Iran’s old lion-and-sun flag and other national symbols used during the time of the shah to “claim public spaces as your own.” Pahlavi’s support of and from Israel has drawn criticism in the past — particularly after the 12-day war. Demonstrators have shouted in support of the shah in some protests, but it isn’t clear whether that’s support for Pahlavi himself or a desire to return to a time before the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The demonstrations began Dec. 28 over the collapse of the Iranian rial currency, which trades at over 1.4 million to $1, as the country’s economy is squeezed by international sanctions in part levied over its nuclear program. The protests intensified and grew into calls directly challenging Iran’s theocracy.