Movies set to return to big screens in Kashmir Valley after over two decades

A policeman stands guard next to a multi-screen cinema hall run by India’s leading multiplex chain Inox before its inauguration in Srinagar on Tuesday. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 21 September 2022
Follow

Movies set to return to big screens in Kashmir Valley after over two decades

  • Kashmir now has three cinema halls, latest multiplex set to start showing movies soon
  • As security risk prevails in volatile region, residents question cinema initiative

NEW DELHI: Movies are set to return to the big screens in Kashmir Valley after more than two decades, as a top Indian government inaugurated on Tuesday a multi-screen cinema hall in Srinagar, which he said represented a “new dawn” for the volatile region.  

Srinagar, the largest city in the disputed Muslim-majority region, had over a dozen theaters before an armed anti-India rebellion broke out in 1989 and gripped the valley, forcing its last cinema hall to close in 1999. 

Indian multiplex chain Inox will be the city’s first multi-screen cinema hall since then, with screenings scheduled to start from the end of September. Over the weekend, Administrator of Jammu and Kashmir Manoj Sinha inaugurated two theaters in Shopian and Pulwama, two militancy-scarred districts of the region.

“It is a reflection of a new dawn of hope, dreams, confidence and aspirations of people,” Sinha said at the inauguration on Tuesday. 

“The government in Delhi is very clear…that it does not believe in buying peace but establishing peace, and for that we are making efforts,” he added.

For Vijay Dhar, a Srinagar-based entrepreneur who took the initiative to open theaters in Kashmir and has been working with Inox to make that happen, it was a dream come true. 

“We were running theater halls when they were closed down in the 1990s. It was already in my DNA to have an entertainment center,” Dhar told Arab News.

Though he is aware there is a security risk in the valley, Dhar said his decision to open the theater in the valley was sincere.  

“My idea is that if a movie is released in Mumbai, it should be released in Kashmir,” he said. “This is from our heart, our contribution to Kashmir and to the people. The question of security does not arise.”

Kashmir is claimed in full but ruled in part by nuclear-arch rivals India and Pakistan, who have fought two wars for control of the territory. 

The region of Jammu and Kashmir, which is controlled by India, has been witnessing a wave of deadly attacks since August 2019, when the government abrogated the Muslim-majority region’s limited constitutional autonomy to bring it under the direct rule of New Delhi. 

As the cinemas’ return makes headlines across India, residents of the valley are questioning the initiative. 

Prof. Siddiq Wahid, a Srinagar-based political analyst, called it a “non-event.”  

“If the intent is a projection of some sort of victory over extremism, then it is a cheap attempt at politicization. If it is crony capitalism at work, then it is a corruption story. My suspicion is that it is a combination of both, so in real terms: a non-event,” Wahid told Arab News. 

Srinagar resident Sandeep Kaul said he will “think many times” before going to the cinema.

“I feel the government should have first created a conducive atmosphere for security before promoting entertainment in the valley,” Kaul told Arab News. “For me, it would be taking a grave risk considering the prevailing security situation in the valley.”

Deeba Ashraf, a lawyer based in the city, told Arab News that Kashmir residents “don’t need theaters.” 

“We need better transport facilities, better educational system, better jobs, better healthcare facilities,” Ashraf said. 

The opening of the theaters in Kashmir is part of the government’s attempt “to portray normalcy,” Aijaz Ahmad, a businessman based in Srinagar, told Arab News. 

“But we all know how the situation is in the region,” Ahmad said. 


US quits global organization dedicated to preventing violent extremism

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

US quits global organization dedicated to preventing violent extremism

  • With other international agencies scaling back following mass US foreign aid cuts last year, GCERF said it now carries much of the global prevention burden alone, and that its $50 million annual budget had not risen to fill the growing gaps

GENEVA: A global organization dedicated to preventing violent extremism said on ​Friday the US had made a mistake in withdrawing its support while the risk of militant attacks surges in the Middle East and Africa’s Sahel.
The Global Community Engagement and Resilience Fund, which supports prevention programs across dozens of countries with communities vulnerable to extremism — appeared on Wednesday in a White House memo announcing a US pullout from 35 international agencies and 31 UN entities it said rejected US interests.
Dr. Khalid ‌Koser, head of ‌the Geneva-based GCERF, said the decision came ‌as ⁠a ​surprise and ‌without explanation and that it reflected a deeper ideological shift under US President Donald Trump’s administration away from multilateral prevention programs toward security-focused counterterrorism measures.
“I think it’s a mistake to take out that fundamental piece of prevention. But I don’t think this administration believes in prevention,” Koser told Reuters.
The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Koser said ⁠risks of extremist violence were higher than at any point since the 2011 Arab Spring ‌uprisings, citing as examples Afghanistan, the Sahel and ‍camps in northeast Syria that hold tens ‍of thousands of Daesh family members — and a new generation ‍at risk of radicalization after the Gaza war.
“If you don’t work on prevention, then in 10 years time, you’re going to have lots of terrorists and lots of problems.”
Further underlining a US repudiation of multilateral cooperation bodies under Trump’s “America ​First” policy, the White House also announced it was quitting the 30-nation Global Counterterrorism Forum.
The US helped establish GCERF’s program ⁠in northeast Syria that helps reintegrate families from former Daesh militant circles. Koser said that while GCERF’s work would go on, it was losing a major player in the US, and that Washington’s decision was perplexing given GCERF’s agenda remained relevant to US national interests.
With other international agencies scaling back following mass US foreign aid cuts last year, GCERF said it now carries much of the global prevention burden alone, and that its $50 million annual budget had not risen to fill the growing gaps.
The 2025 Global Terrorism Index issued by the Institute for Economics and Peace showed the ‌number of countries recording a terrorist attack increased from 58 to 66 in 2024, reversing nearly a decade of improvements.