UK media regulator revokes Russian-backed television channel RT’s license

Russian-backed television channel RT’s license to broadcast in the UK was revoked with immediate effect. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 18 March 2022
Follow

UK media regulator revokes Russian-backed television channel RT’s license

  • ‘We do not consider RT to be fit and proper to hold a UK license’

LONDON: Britain’s media regulator on Friday revoked Russian-backed television channel RT’s license to broadcast in the United Kingdom with immediate effect, citing its links to the Kremlin.

The regulator, Ofcom, said in a statement that RT received funding from the Russian state, which has launched am invasion of Ukraine and cracked down on independent journalism.

Ofcom said it was not satisfied that RT could be a responsible broadcaster. Its investigation took into account RT’s relationship with the Russian government, it said.

“It has recognized that RT is funded by the Russian state, which has recently invaded a neighboring sovereign country,” it said.

“We also note new laws in Russia which effectively criminalize any independent journalism that departs from the Russian state’s own news narrative, particularly in relation to the invasion of Ukraine.

In light of that, it was impossible for RT to comply with the impartiality rules in Britain’s broadcasting code, it said.

The Kremlin crticized the move.

“This is a continuation of the madness which is going on in America and Europe — it is anti-Russian madness,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. “This is yet another step that crudely limits freedom of speech.”

Russia has cut access to several foreign news organizations’ websites, including the BBC, for spreading what it alleged was false information about the war. Bloomberg News temporarily suspended the work of its journalists inside Russia, citing the new media law.

RT, which is currently off air in Britain due to EU sanctions, called the decision unfair.

“Ofcom has shown the UK public, and the regulatory community internationally, that despite a well-constructed facade of independence, it is nothing more than a tool of government, bending to its media-suppressing will,” Anna Belkina, RT’s deputy editor in chief, said.

Britain, which has accused RT of being a tool of a Kremlin disinformation campaign in the past, had asked Ofcom to take action against RT if needed. The government imposed a travel ban and froze the assets of RT’s editor in chief Margarita Simonyan this week.

Russian officials say RT is a way for Moscow to compete with the dominance of global media companies based in the United States and Britain that Moscow says offer a partial view of the world.

Separately, Ofcom currently has 29 investigations into RT’s impartiality concerning coverage of the war. It said while those were ongoing, the volume and potentially serious nature of the concerns raised was deeply concerning.

Facebook owner Meta and Google have barred Russian state media from getting money for ads on their platforms. RT’s Facebook page was not available to view in Britain but its Twitter handle was still active.

Ofcom fined £200,000 in 2019 for not complying with its rules in its coverage of Britain’s response to the Salisbury nerve agent attack on a former Russian spy, and the Syrian conflict.


Riyadh panel unpacks media influence in digital era 

Updated 58 min 46 sec ago
Follow

Riyadh panel unpacks media influence in digital era 

  • Arab News-led discussion at SMF examines the realities behind media power and sustainability
  • Session explored the evolving global media landscape, comparing traditional publishers with newer digital players

RIYADH: “We don’t shape narratives, they shape us,” Vincent Peyregne, former CEO of World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers, told a panel at the Saudi Media Forum in Riyadh on Monday. 

Moderated by Arab News Editor-in-Chief Faisal Al-Abbas, the session titled “How do alliances shape global public opinion?” explored how media organizations navigate public opinion, commercial pressures, and the shift away from traditional revenue models. It challenged the notion that media outlets can control audience perception. 

“In some part, we document the public opinion,” Peyregne added. “But I don’t see any reasonable publishers in our network saying, ‘I’m shaping the public opinion.’”

Al-Abbas described the idea of media shaping public opinion as an illusion when responding to questions about a “secret formula of success,” saying: “The perception that anybody can dominate public opinion is an illusion,” he said.

The session explored the evolving global media landscape, comparing traditional publishers with newer digital players and examining how alliances and platforms influence reach and sustainability. 

A key theme was the decline of state support for private media. Peyregne argued that the era of subsidies is effectively over, stressing that editorial independence depends on financial self-sufficiency. 

Ben Smith, cofounder and editor in chief of Semafor, echoed this view by noting that many traditional publishers mistakenly wait for the government to “give back” their audience or revenue.

Smith, who brings a different perspective to the session with a background at Politico and Buzzfeed, said, “There is a tendency among the traditional publishers to say, ‘We know how the world is meant to be organized and the new players are taking an audience that is meant for us.’”

He argued that media must adapt to the digital ecosystem rather than seeking government-mandated compensation as a primary survival strategy.

Peyregne added that publishers are increasingly moving away from the “victim mentality” or “blame game” and instead are taking responsibility for their own survival rather than relying on regulators or blaming platforms like Google and Facebook.

He outlined a three-pillar revenue model for sustainable media companies, moving away from 80 percent ad reliance toward a balanced mix of advertising, paid content, direct audience relationships, and diversification through events, data, and digital agencies.