US president warned against hasty peace deal in Yemen

Yemen’s government and experts have warned the US administration against supporting a hasty peace settlement that does not include disarming the Houthi group. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 11 February 2021
Follow

US president warned against hasty peace deal in Yemen

  • The minister criticized members of the US congress who focused their criticism on the Arab coalition supporting the Yemeni government

AL-MUKALLA: Yemen’s government and experts have warned the US administration against supporting a hasty peace settlement that does not include disarming the Houthi group.

Yemen’s Foreign Minister Ahmed Awadh bin Mubarak reminded US President Joe Biden of his previous commitments in 2012 when he was a vice president to support the Yemeni government during the early days of the transitional period. The foreign minister, in an op-ed article in the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, said that the Iran-backed Houthis were responsible for the humanitarian crisis and the protracted war after their coup disrupted the country’s roadmap for peace and democracy in 2014.

“No one prays and struggles for an end to this war more than we do. But that doesn’t mean we will submit to fanatics who send Yemeni children to “indoctrination camps” and whose motto proclaims “Death to America” and “Curse on the Jews,” the foreign minister said, expressing the government’s concerns about the Biden’s reversal of terrorism charges against the Houthis. 

“We seek a role in governance for all Yemenis. But getting there will require sustained US pressure on the Houthis and their enablers. We worry about that commitment given the administration’s decision to revoke its designation of the Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization,” he said. “We need a realistic and robust peace plan for Yemen, backed by the full force of American diplomacy. We welcome the new US special envoy to Yemen, Timothy Lenderking, and we commit to working for a political solution.”

The minister criticized members of the US congress who focused their criticism on the Arab coalition supporting the Yemeni government and ignored Houthi crimes against Yemenis and their disruption of peace efforts and resistance to repairing the floating Safer tanker in the Red Sea. 

“They have launched drones and ballistic missiles at neighboring countries, and have coordinated with US-designated terrorist groups such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Hezbollah. Last week we learned they are still obstructing international efforts to salvage the FSO Safer oil tanker and avert an environmental catastrophe.”

Meanwhile, Nadwa Al-Dawsari, a Yemeni conflict analyst and a non-resident scholar at the US-based Middle East Institute, has warned Biden against pushing for a hasty peace settlement that would leave the Houthis armed. 

“A political settlement under the current circumstances might be a quick win for American and Western diplomacy,” she said in a paper published by the institute on Tuesday. “But it will most likely reinforce the current power dynamics and lock Yemen into a cycle of perpetual war, bringing 30 million Yemenis closer to famine and pushing the country farther away from peace.”

Nadwa argues that US pressure on the Arab coalition or Yemeni government to reach a deal with the Houthis would not put an end to the war or alleviate the humanitarian crisis since the conflict is complex and also because the US is unable to exert the same pressure on the Houthis to abide by any deal. 

“While the Biden administration can successfully put pressure on the Saudi-led coalition and the Yemeni government, it does not have the same leverage on the Houthis, who currently have the upper hand militarily,” she said.

Striking a deal with the heavily armed and powerful Houthi group, Nadwa warned, would encourage them to violate the truce and attack their opponents. 

“A political settlement, therefore, risks tipping the military balance in favor of the Houthis, who have failed to demonstrate any commitment to cease-fires in the past.” 

Citing the current Houthi offensive on the city of Marib, Nadwa said that Biden’s removal of the Houthis from the terrorism list had sent the wrong message to the rebels and pushed them into resuming military operations. 

“Indeed, the very next day after Biden’s decision to revoke the FTO designation, the Houthis mobilized their forces and launched a renewed offensive to seize the oil-rich city of Marib as well as (make) cross-border drone attacks against Saudi Arabia,” she said.

Soleimani’s shadow
Qassem Soleimani left a trail of death and destruction in his wake as head of Iran’s Quds Force … until his assassination on Jan. 3, 2020. Yet still, his legacy of murderous interference continues to haunt the region

Enter


keywords

Trump says ‘hopefully’ no need for military action against Iran

Updated 58 min 28 sec ago
Follow

Trump says ‘hopefully’ no need for military action against Iran

  • US president said he is speaking with Iran and left open the possibility of avoiding a military operation
  • An Iranian military spokesman warned Tehran’s response to any US action would not be limited

PARIS: US President Donald Trump said on Thursday he hoped to avoid military action against Iran, which has threatened to strike American bases and aircraft carriers in response to any attack.
Trump said he is speaking with Iran and left open the possibility of avoiding a military operation after earlier warning time was “running out” for Tehran as the United States sends a large naval fleet to the region.
When asked if he would have talks with Iran, Trump told reporters: “I have had and I am planning on it.”
“We have a group headed out to a place called Iran, and hopefully we won’t have to use it,” the US president added, while speaking to media at the premiere of a documentary about his wife Melania.
As Brussels and Washington dialed up their rhetoric and Iran issued stark threats this week, UN chief Antonio Guterres has called for nuclear negotiations to “avoid a crisis that could have devastating consequences in the region.”
An Iranian military spokesman warned Tehran’s response to any US action would not be limited — as it was in June last year when American planes and missiles briefly joined Israel’s short air war against Iran — but would be a decisive response “delivered instantly.”
Brig. Gen. Mohammad Akraminia told state television US aircraft carriers have “serious vulnerabilities” and that numerous American bases in the Gulf region are “within the range of our medium-range missiles.”
“If such a miscalculation is made by the Americans, it will certainly not unfold the way Trump imagines — carrying out a quick operation and then, two hours later, tweeting that the operation is over,” he said.
An official in the Gulf, where states host US military sites, said that fears of a US strike on Iran are “very clear.”
“It would bring the region into chaos, it would hurt the economy not just in the region but in the US and cause oil and gas prices to skyrocket,” the official added.
‘Protests crushed in blood’
Qatar’s leader Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani and Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian held a call to discuss “efforts being made to de-escalate tensions and establish stability,” the Qatar News Agency (QNA) reported.
The European Union, meanwhile, piled on the pressure by designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) a “terrorist organization” over a deadly crackdown on recent mass protests.
“’Terrorist’ is indeed how you call a regime that crushes its own people’s protests in blood,” said EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, welcoming the “overdue” decision.
Though largely symbolic, the EU decision has already drawn a warning from Tehran.
Iran’s military slammed “the illogical, irresponsible and spite-driven action of the European Union,” alleging the bloc was acting out of “obedience” to Tehran’s arch-foes the United States and Israel.
Iranian officials have blamed the recent protest wave on the two countries, claiming their agents spurred “riots” and a “terrorist operation” that hijacked peaceful rallies sparked over economic grievances.
Rights groups have said thousands of people were killed during the protests by security forces, including the IRGC — the ideological arm of Tehran’s military.
In Tehran on Thursday, citizens expressed grim resignation.
“I think the war is inevitable and a change must happen. It can be for worse, or better. I am not sure,” said a 29-year-old waitress, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.
“I am not in favor of war. I just want something to happen that would result in something better.”
Another 29-year-old woman, an unemployed resident of an upscale neighborhood in northern Tehran, said: “I believe that life has highs and lows and we are now at the lowest point.”
Trump had threatened military action if protesters were killed in the anti-government demonstrations that erupted in late December and peaked on January 8 and 9.
But his more recent statements have turned to Iran’s nuclear program, which the West believes is aimed at making an atomic bomb.
On Wednesday, he said “time is running out” for Tehran to make a deal, warning the US naval strike group that arrived in Middle East waters on Monday was “ready, willing and able” to hit Iran.
Conflicting tolls
The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) said it has confirmed 6,479 people were killed in the protests, as Internet restrictions imposed on January 8 continue to slow verification.
But rights groups warn the toll is likely far higher, with estimates in the tens of thousands.
Iranian authorities acknowledge that thousands were killed during the protests, giving a toll of more than 3,000 deaths, but say the majority were members of the security forces or bystanders killed by “rioters.”
Billboards and banners have gone up in the capital Tehran to bolster the authorities’ messages. One massive poster appears to show an American aircraft carrier being destroyed.