Oxford COVID-19 vaccine trial set to recommence

Advanced trials of the coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine developed by a team at Oxford University in partnership with pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca are set to resume. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 10 September 2020
Follow

Oxford COVID-19 vaccine trial set to recommence

  • Patient suspected of developing transverse myelitis to be discharged after condition not diagnosed

LONDON: Advanced trials of the coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine developed by a team at Oxford University in partnership with pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca are set to resume after being halted over fears that subjects might suffer adverse side effects.

AstraZeneca stopped trials in the UK, US, South Africa and Brazil after a patient was hospitalized with suspected transverse myelitis (TM), an inflammatory condition affecting the spinal cord. However, the patient in question is set to be released from hospital after examinations suggested she did not have the condition.

The company’s CEO Pascal Soriot said the delay had been “temporary” and that a panel of experts would investigate the situation.

“This is a routine action which has to happen whenever there is a potentially unexplained illness in one of the trials ... in large clinical trials, illnesses will happen by chance and must be independently reviewed,” an AstraZeneca spokesperson said.

Pauses in drug and vaccine trials are not unusual, and this is the second time the Oxford vaccine has had to be delayed because of unexplained illness. In July, AstraZeneca confirmed, trials were temporarily set back after a patient was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, in a development unrelated to the vaccine.

Early phases of the trial, including around 1,000 volunteers in the UK, have seen several side effects among subjects, including fatigue and headaches.

Robin Shattock, professor of mucosal infection and immunity at Imperial College London, said: “I think this is pretty normal — if it’s shown not to be related to the vaccine it will restart in a couple of days and it will be seen as a storm in a teacup. Even if associated with the vaccine they may be allowed to proceed but with caution.”

UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock told British radio station LBC: “This is a normal part of a vaccine development that, when you find a problem, the system is paused while you investigate that particular problem. What it underlines is that we won’t bring forward a vaccine unless it is safe, no matter how enthusiastic I am for a vaccine.”

The Oxford project had been considered the frontrunner in the global quest to discover a viable vaccine for COVID-19, but some analysts now say that the delay could hand the initiative to a rival team.

US biotech firm Moderna and German company Biontech, in partnership with the US drugmaker Pfizer, are among those developing vaccines that have also reached the advanced trial stage.

Analysts at JP Morgan Cazenove, the US stockbroker, said: “While it is true that a delay could increase Moderna’s and Biontech’s odds of winning the so-called ‘race to the COVID-19 vaccine finish line,’ we think this adds little fundamental value, as a vaccine’s ultimate clinical profile should trump any first-mover advantage in what we still anticipate to be a competitive market.”

Dr Siu Ping Lam, the director of vaccine licensing at the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, said: “We are urgently reviewing all the information and actively engaging with the researchers to determine whether the trial should restart as quickly as possible. Vaccine safety is of paramount importance and we continually monitor the safety of vaccines to ensure that the benefits outweigh any potential risks.”

Soriot confirmed, meanwhile, that the trial subject suspected of developing TM, a woman from the UK, had been given the Oxford vaccine and not a placebo as part of the trial.

Ian Jones, professor of virology at the University of Reading, said: “It’s inflammation of nervous tissue which can be caused by a number of agents, one of which is viruses. The stoppage might be because the symptoms are plausibly linked to the vaccine, although it could be something else.”

-ENDS-


8 in 10 British Muslims face ‘financial faith penalty’ when seeking home finance, survey finds

Updated 04 February 2026
Follow

8 in 10 British Muslims face ‘financial faith penalty’ when seeking home finance, survey finds

  • Restricted choices plague potential buyers

LONDON: Eight in 10 British Muslims say their home finance choices are restricted because of their faith, according to a new national survey that highlighted what researchers describe as a growing “financial faith penalty” in the UK housing market.

The report, published by Islamic home finance fintech firm Offa, found that 80 percent of Muslim respondents believe their religious beliefs limit their access to suitable home finance, while those who do use Islamic products often face slower decisions, heavier paperwork and poorer customer experiences than in the conventional mortgage market.

Based on surveys of 1,000 British Muslims conducted by Muslim Census, and 2,000 non-Muslims carried out by OnePoll, the research calls on providers, brokers and policymakers to modernize Islamic home finance and improve access to Sharia-compliant products.

Among the 24.3 percent of British Muslims who have used Islamic home finance, just 5 percent said they had received a same-day decision.

Some 62 percent waited up to two weeks, while 33 percent waited more than 15 days, including 16 percent who waited over a month.

Long decision times were cited as the biggest challenge by 28 percent of respondents, followed by excessive paperwork (22.6 percent) and poor customer service (18.9 percent).

Islamic home finance differs from conventional mortgages by avoiding interest and steering investment away from sectors considered harmful to society, including gambling, alcohol, tobacco, arms trading and animal testing.

Sagheer Malik, chief commercial officer and managing director of home finance at Offa, said the findings showed British Muslims were being underserved by outdated systems.

Malik said: “Property is the asset class of choice for many of the UK’s 3.87 million Muslims, both as a route to generational wealth and as a long-term financial foundation, yet our insightful research report reveals that British Muslims are being underserved and deterred by slow, outdated and opaque Islamic home finance provision.

“This is not a niche concern. It goes to the heart of financial fairness and inclusion in modern Britain.”

He added that Muslims deserved Sharia-compliant products that matched mainstream standards on “price, speed and simplicity.”

Despite strong demand, uptake remains low.

Only 12.8 percent of British Muslims surveyed said they currently use Islamic home finance, with a further 11.5 percent having done so in the past. More than three quarters (75.7 percent) have never used it.

Faith plays a central role in financial decisions, with 94.2 percent saying it is important that their financial products align with their ethical or religious beliefs. Yet more than half of those using conventional mortgages said they felt unhappy or uneasy about doing so because of their faith.

The study also found that British Muslims share similar home ownership aspirations to the wider population, with 79.1 percent citing the desire to provide a stable home for their family, while 18.6 percent said building generational wealth was their main motivation. Only 2.2 percent said they did not want to own a home.

The report suggests Islamic finance could appeal beyond Muslim communities. While 64 percent of non-Muslim respondents had never heard of Islamic home finance, 63 percent said they favored its ethical principles once explained.

Younger generations were the most receptive, with 43 percent of Generation Z and 37 percent of millennials saying they would consider using Islamic home finance, compared with just 7 percent of baby boomers. More than three quarters of Gen Z and 72 percent of millennials also said it was important that their finance provider avoided investing in ethically harmful sectors.

Offa said the findings pointed to an opportunity to expand ethical finance in the UK, provided the industry can deliver faster, simpler and more transparent services.