India holding 1.7bn people of South Asia hostage, says Qureshi

Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, second right, attended the informal session of SAARC foreign ministers along the sidelines of the UNGA session in New York. (Photo courtesy: Pakistan Foreign Office)
Updated 29 September 2018
Follow

India holding 1.7bn people of South Asia hostage, says Qureshi

  • Indian Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj walked out of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation council of ministers’ meeting before Pakistan’s statement amid new low in bilateral ties
  • Indian and Pakistani foreign ministers were set to meet along the sidelines of UNGA session in New York but New Delhi called it off last week

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi has accused India of failing the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and hindering regional connectivity through its unbecoming behavior.
He was speaking to the media after the annual SAARC council of ministers meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.
The meeting was hosted and chaired by Nepal’s Foreign Minister, Pradeep Kumar Gyawali, and attended by the foreign ministers of SAARC member states. However, Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj, in a diplomatic snub, walked out of the meeting before Pakistan’s statement.
“The attitude of only one country is hindering the spirit and objectives of the SAARC,” Qureshi told reporters after the meeting.
He also said in his tweet that “…We want SAARC to be a results-oriented body capable of making substantive progress. But I’m disappointed that the prosperity of the entire SAARC region is being held hostage by one nation.”

When asked by reporters in New York if he had spoken to Swaraj, Qureshi said his Indian counterpart left in the middle of the SAARC meeting and that he paid careful attention to her call for regional cooperation but it was India herself that acted as a barrier to that cooperation.
“The foreign minister emphasized that one country was holding the 1.7 billion people of South Asia hostage, while making vague statements and unsubstantiated, whimsical allegations. The SAARC summit has already been delayed by two years, with no end in sight,” said a statement by the Foreign Office.
Pakistan’s foreign minister and his Indian counterpart were set to meet on the sidelines of the UNGA in New York this week but New Delhi called off the meeting last week, citing the killings of Indian Border Security Force personnel near the Pakistan-India border as the reason, in addition to Islamabad issuing postage stamps of slain Kashmiri freedom fighter Burhan Wani.
Pakistan’s leadership had expressed its disappointment on the cancelation of the meeting by India.
Meanwhile, on Friday, Qureshi met the UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, and raised human rights violations in Indian-administered Kashmir. He urged the UN secretary-general to play his role in resolution of the dispute, said the Pakistan Foreign Ministry on Saturday in a press statement.


Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan takes oath as chief justice of Pakistan’s first Constitutional Court

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan takes oath as chief justice of Pakistan’s first Constitutional Court

  • The Federal Constitutional Court will now decide cases involving Pakistan’s constitution, instead of the Supreme Court
  • Two Supreme Court judges resigned Thursday in protest against 27th constitutional amendment which paved way for FCC

ISLAMABAD: Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan on Friday took oath as the first chief justice of the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), following sweeping changes in the country’s military and judicial command structure.

The FCC was formed after the government made changes to the military and judicial command structure via the 27th constitutional amendment. The amendment shifts constitutional cases from the Supreme Court to the FCC while it grants expanded powers to Pakistan’s army chief.

President Asif Ali Zardari administered oath to the FCC Chief Justice Khan at a ceremony in Islamabad, which was attended by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, cabinet members, Supreme Court Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, parliamentarians and top military officials.

“I, Justice Amin-Ud-Din Khan, do solemnly swear that I will bear true faith and allegiance to Pakistan, that as chief justice of the Federal Constitutional Court of Pakistan, I will discharge my duties and perform my functions honestly, to the best of my ability and faithfully in accordance with the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the law,” Khan said as he took oath as the Constitutional Court chief justice.

“I will not allow my personal interest to influence my official conduct or my official decisions.”

FCC Chief Justice Khan was born on Dec. 1, 1960 in the eastern city of Multan where he received his education from Kindergarten Muslim School. He completed his secondary education from the Government Muslim High School in 1977, according to the Supreme Court’s website.

He secured his bachelor’s degree in Philosophy in 1981 and completed his L.L.B degree from the University Law College in Multan in 1984 and also secured a diploma in Taxation Law. Khan obtained the license to practice in Pakistan’s lower courts in 1985 before enrolling as an advocate of the Lahore High Court in 1987.

He was later enrolled as an advocate of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2001. The FCC chief justice was involved there in mostly civil cases relating to property, preemption and matters of inheritance. He was elevated to the bench in 2011 and during his stint as judge, he decided thousands of civil cases in the Bahawalpur and Multan benches of the Lahore High Court.

In 2019, Khan was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court in 2019.

His appointment to the post of FCC chief justice on Thursday took place hours after two Supreme Court judges, Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, resigned in protest against the 27th constitutional amendment, with Justice Shah describing it as a “grave assault” on the constitution.

The FCC was set up after years of clashes between the executive and the judiciary. Verdicts issued by the top court over the years ousted prime ministers from office and put the judiciary on a confrontational path with the governments at the time.