Top Pakistan, Afghan security advisers vow to bridge trust gap

Pakistani and Afghan national security advisers hold talks in Islamabad on security issues on May 27, 2018. (Photo courtesy: Afghan DCM/Twitter)
Updated 28 May 2018
Follow

Top Pakistan, Afghan security advisers vow to bridge trust gap

  • Both countries agreed this month to operationalize the Afghanistan Pakistan Action Plan for Peace and Solidarity
  • After more than 17 years, both countries have agreed to engage in a structured dialogue, says expert

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Afghanistan on Sunday agreed to implement the key principles of a new bilateral dialogue mechanism which says both sides will “undertake effective actions against fugitives and the irreconcilable elements posing security threats to either of the two countries.”
Afghanistan has long accused Pakistan of “sheltering” Taliban leaders, a charge Islamabad denies. On their part, Pakistani officials insist that Pakistani armed groups now operate from the ungoverned areas on the Afghan side of the border.
After a series of discussions both countries agreed this month to operationalize the Afghanistan Pakistan Action Plan for Peace and Solidarity (APAPPS), which provides a framework to deepen interaction in all spheres of bilateral engagements.
Afghan National Security Adviser Haneef Atmar led a high-level delegation comprising intelligence chief Masum Stanekzai, Interior Minister Wais Barmak and Afghan ambassador to Pakistan Omar Zakhilwal in talks with Pakistani officials in Islamabad.
National Security Adviser Lt. General (Retd) Nasser Khan Janjua led the Pakistani side and both countries “reiterated to work closely on sincere implementation of APPAPS to seek peace which is so essential for the suffering people of both the countries.”
Both sides established that peace was their common and biggest need that can come through the implementation of APAPPS, which has the potential to bridge the gaps of the past and also makes the bridges for the future, the NSA office said.




Afghanistan top security adviser Haneef Atmar, third from the left, arrives in Islamabad for talks with Pakistani officials on security officials on May 27, 2018. (Photo courtesy: Afghan DCM/Twitter) 


Five working groups have been operationalized for meaningful engagement: the Politico-Diplomatic Working Group, the Economic Working Group, the Refugee Working Group, Military to Military Coordination and Intelligence Cooperation.
Experts in Pakistan and Afghanistan seem upbeat at the launch of the new bilateral mechanism and both sides are now looking into the issues that have been the main concern of both countries.
Former Afghan deputy trade minister, Muzammil Shinwari, described the APAPPS as “quite important” for both countries as it focuses on areas that are relevant to both countries and it can solve many problems that arise between them.
“The first important point is that Pakistan and Afghanistan have agreed that both countries should not let their soil to be utilized by the insurgents in order to harm the other country. The other key point is an end to the blame game. I think these two points are creating most of the problems but if they are agreed on this. I think the other issues will be automatically resolved and addressed,” Shinwari, who also heads a track-II group with a Pakistani institute, told Arab News from Kabul.
He said APAPPS has also paved the way for a trade officials meeting in Islamabad that led to an agreement to resolve some issues in bilateral trade and transit.
Imtiaz Gul, director of an Islamabad-based research group, says that APAPPS is significantly important because after more than 17 years, both countries have agreed to engage in a structured dialogue, particularly after long reluctance by the Afghans to hold talks at all.
“Now APAPPS not only provides a joint mechanism for pursuing all issues but also commits both countries to refrain from public blame games, and take demonstrable action against all those elements that threaten the respective country,” Gul, executive director of the Center for Research and Security Studies told Arab News.


EU leaders to reassess US ties despite Trump U-turn on Greenland

Updated 22 January 2026
Follow

EU leaders to reassess US ties despite Trump U-turn on Greenland

  • Diplomats stressed that, although Thursday’s emergency EU talks in Brussels would now lose some of their urgency, the longer-term issue of how to handle the relationship with the US remained

BRUSSELS: EU leaders will rethink their ties with the US at an emergency summit on Thursday after Donald Trump’s threat of tariffs and even military action to ​acquire Greenland badly shook confidence in the transatlantic relationship, diplomats said.
Trump abruptly stepped back on Wednesday from his threat of tariffs on eight European nations, ruled out using force to take Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of NATO ally Denmark, and suggested a deal was in sight to end the dispute.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, welcoming Trump’s U-turn on Greenland, urged Europeans not to be too quick to write off the transatlantic partnership.
But EU governments remain wary of another change of mind by a mercurial president who is increasingly seen as a bully that Europe will have to stand up to, and they are focused on coming up with a longer-term plan on how to deal with the ‌United States under this ‌administration and possibly its successors too.
“Trump crossed the Rubicon. He might do ‌it ⁠again. ​There is no ‌going back to what it was. And leaders will discuss it,” one EU diplomat said, adding that the bloc needed to move away from its heavy reliance on the US in many areas.
“We need to try to keep him (Trump) close while working on becoming more independent from the US It is a process, probably a long one,” the diplomat said.
EU RELIANCE ON US
After decades of relying on the United States for defense within the NATO alliance, the EU lacks the needed intelligence, transport, missile defense and production capabilities to defend itself against a possible Russian attack. This gives the US substantial leverage.
The US ⁠is also Europe’s biggest trading partner, making the EU vulnerable to Trump’s policies of imposing tariffs to reduce Washington’s trade deficit in goods, and, as in ‌the case of Greenland, to achieve other goals.
“We need to discuss where ‍the red lines are, how we deal with this bully ‍across the Atlantic, where our strengths are,” a second EU diplomat said.
“Trump says no tariffs today, but does ‍that mean also no tariffs tomorrow, or will he again quickly change his mind? We need to discuss what to do then,” the second diplomat said.
The EU had been considering a package of retaliatory tariffs on 93 billion euros ($108.74 billion) on US imports or anti-coercive measures if Trump had gone ahead with his own tariffs, while knowing such a step would harm Europe’s economy as well ​as the United States.
WHAT’S THE GREENLAND DEAL?
Several diplomats noted there were still few details of the new plan for Greenland, agreed between Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte late on ⁠Wednesday on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
“Nothing much changed. We still need to see details of the Greenland deal. We are a bit fed up with all the bullying. And we need to act on a few things: more resiliency, unity, get our things together on internal market, competitiveness. And no more accepting tariff bullying,” a third diplomat said.
Rutte told Reuters in an interview in Davos on Thursday that under the framework deal he reached with Trump the Western allies would have to step up their presence in the Arctic.
He also said talks would continue between Denmark, Greenland and the US on specific issues.
Diplomats stressed that, although Thursday’s emergency EU talks in Brussels would now lose some of their urgency, the longer-term issue of how to handle the relationship with the US remained.
“The approach of a united front in solidarity with Denmark and Greenland while focusing on de-escalation and finding an off-ramp has worked,” a fourth EU diplomat said.
“At the ‌same time it would be good to reflect on the state of the relationship and how we want to shape this going forward, given the experiences of the past week (and year),” he said.