WASHINGTON: Attorney General Jeff Sessions came under fire late Wednesday after the Washington Post reported he met twice last year with Russia’s ambassador to Washington, seemingly contradicting statements he made in Senate confirmation hearings in January.
The revelation cast a fresh cloud over President Donald Trump’s administration — which has repeatedly denied any suspected ties between members of the Republican’s election campaign and Russia — which US intelligence says interfered in the 2016 election against Trump’s rival Hillary Clinton.
The White House quickly labeled the report an attack by partisan Democrats, confirming the meetings but arguing Sessions did nothing wrong.
In a statement Session said: “I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign. I have no idea what this allegation is about. It is false.”
But with US intelligence agencies, the Department of Justice, and four Congressional committees examining the Russia scandal, Democrats demanded Sessions — the Trump administration’s top law enforcement official — recuse himself from investigations, and for Congress to name an independent special investigator to oversee a broad probe.
“Given AG Sessions’ false statements about contacts with Russian officials, we need a special counsel to investigate Trump associates’ ties to Russia,” said Democrat Senator Ron Wyden, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
The Washington Post reported late Wednesday that Sessions — formerly a senator who advised Trump’s campaign on foreign policy and other issues — met Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in July and September, just as accusations of Russian interference in the election were mounting.
Sessions, however, told his confirmation hearing at the Senate Judiciary Committee on January 10 that he did not know of contacts between Trump campaign members and Russia.
“I did not have communications with the Russians,” he said under oath.
Sessions was confirmed as attorney general on February 8, moving in place to oversee Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation probes into the alleged communications between Trump campaign officials and Moscow.
A White House official, speaking not for attribution, late Thursday dubbed the report an “attack” aimed at undermining the White House.
“This is the latest attack against the Trump administration by partisan Democrats,” the official said.
“Sessions met with the ambassador in an official capacity as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which is entirely consistent with his testimony.”
US Attorney General did not divulge contact with Russian ambassador: report
US Attorney General did not divulge contact with Russian ambassador: report
Panama court annuls Hong Kong firm’s canal port concession
- The Supreme Court found the laws which allowed CK Hutchison Holdings to operate two of the five ports of the canal ‘unconstitutional’
PANAMA CITY: The Panamanian Supreme Court on Thursday annulled the concession allowing Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison to operate ports at the Panama Canal, a year after US President Donald Trump threatened to seize the crucial passageway claiming China controlled it.
The Supreme Court found the laws which allowed CK Hutchison Holdings to operate two of the five ports of the canal “unconstitutional,” according to a court statement.
The lawsuit to cancel the concession was brought before the Panamanian high court last year on allegations that it was based on unconstitutional laws and that the Hong Kong business was not paying taxes.
Panama Ports Company — a CK Hutchison Holdings subsidiary — currently manages the ports of Cristobal on the canal’s Atlantic side and Balboa on the Pacific side.
That arrangement was automatically renewed in 2021 for another 25 years.
The case came after Trump threatened just days into his second term last year to take back the canal — built by the United States and handed to Panama in 1999 — as he said China was effectively “operating” it.
CK Hutchison Holdings is one of Hong Kong’s largest conglomerates, spanning finance, retail, infrastructure, telecoms and logistics.
It has sought to sell the Panama Canal ports to a consortium led by US asset manager BlackRock.
The Supreme Court found the laws which allowed CK Hutchison Holdings to operate two of the five ports of the canal “unconstitutional,” according to a court statement.
The lawsuit to cancel the concession was brought before the Panamanian high court last year on allegations that it was based on unconstitutional laws and that the Hong Kong business was not paying taxes.
Panama Ports Company — a CK Hutchison Holdings subsidiary — currently manages the ports of Cristobal on the canal’s Atlantic side and Balboa on the Pacific side.
That arrangement was automatically renewed in 2021 for another 25 years.
The case came after Trump threatened just days into his second term last year to take back the canal — built by the United States and handed to Panama in 1999 — as he said China was effectively “operating” it.
CK Hutchison Holdings is one of Hong Kong’s largest conglomerates, spanning finance, retail, infrastructure, telecoms and logistics.
It has sought to sell the Panama Canal ports to a consortium led by US asset manager BlackRock.
© 2026 SAUDI RESEARCH & PUBLISHING COMPANY, All Rights Reserved And subject to Terms of Use Agreement.









