Pakistani man convicted in US in political assassination plot tied to Iranian paramilitary

Asif Merchant, a Pakistani man with alleged ties to Iran, appears on charges in connection with a foiled plot to assassinate a U.S. politician or government officials, in a courtroom in New York, US, on September 16, 2024 in this courtroom sketch. )REUTERS/File)
Short Url
Updated 07 March 2026
Follow

Pakistani man convicted in US in political assassination plot tied to Iranian paramilitary

  • Asif Merchant, 47, worked for Pakistani banks for decades before going into clothing and other businesses
  • He testified he met a Revolutionary Guard operative who gave him countersurveillance training, assignments

NEW YORK: A Pakistani business owner who tried to hire hit men to kill a US politician was convicted Friday in a trial that showcased allegations of Iran-backed plotting on American soil.

As the Iran war unfolded in the Mideast, Asif Merchant acknowledged in a US court that he sought to put an assassination in motion during the 2024 presidential campaign — a plot that was quickly disrupted by American investigators before it had a chance to proceed.

A jury in Brooklyn convicted Merchant on terrorism and murder for hire charges.

The verdict after only a couple hours of deliberations followed a weeklong trial that included remarkable testimony from Merchant himself.

Merchant told the jury he was carrying out instructions from a contact in the Islamic Republic’s powerful paramilitary Revolutionary Guard. According to Merchant, the handler never specified a target but broached names including then-candidate Donald Trump, then-President Joe Biden and Nikki Haley, the former UN ambassador who was also in the race for a time.

The Iranian government has denied trying to kill US officials.

The nascent plot fell apart after Merchant showed an acquaintance what he had in mind by using objects on a napkin to depict a shooting at a rally. He asked the man to help him hire assassins. Instead, he was introduced to undercover FBI agents who were secretly recording him, as had the acquaintance.

Merchant told the supposed hit men he needed services that could include killing “some political person” and paid them $5,000 in cash in a parked car in Manhattan.

“This man landed on American soil hoping to kill President Trump — instead, he was met with the might of American law enforcement,” US Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement released after the conviction.

Merchant’s attorney, Avraham Moskowitz, didn’t immediately reply to a message seeking comment.

Merchant, 47, worked for Pakistani banks for decades before going into clothing and other businesses. He has two families, in Pakistan and Iran, and he sometimes visited the US for his garment business.

Merchant testified that he met a Revolutionary Guard intelligence operative about three years ago. The contact gave him countersurveillance training and assignments including the assassination scheme, Merchant said.

He maintained that he had to do his handler’s bidding to protect loved ones in Iran. The defendant said he reluctantly went through the motions but thought he’d be arrested and explain his situation to authorities before anyone was killed.

“I was going along with it,” he said, speaking in Urdu through a court interpreter.

Prosecutors emphasized that Merchant admitted taking steps to enact the plan on behalf of the Revolutionary Guard, which the US considers a foreign terrorist organization, and he didn’t proactively go to authorities.

Instead, he was packing for a flight to Pakistan when he was arrested on July 12, 2024, a day before an unrelated attempt on Trump’s life in Butler, Pennsylvania. Officials said it appeared the Butler gunman acted alone but that they had been tracking a threat on Trump’s life from Iran, a claim that the Islamic Republic called “unsubstantiated and malicious.”

When Merchant subsequently spoke to FBI agents to explore the possibility of a cooperation agreement, he didn’t say he had acted out of fear for his family.

Prosecutors argued that he didn’t back up a defense of acting under duress. Merchant sought to persuade jurors he simply didn’t think the agents would believe him because they seemed to “think that I am some type of super-spy,” which he said he was “absolutely not.”


Pakistan law minister urges media caution on foreign policy debate amid Middle East tensions

Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan law minister urges media caution on foreign policy debate amid Middle East tensions

  • Azam Nazeer Tarar says constitutional limits must be respected when discussing diplomatic matters
  • He says people can express themselves but sensitive external issues fall outside freedom of expression

ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Law and Justice Azam Nazeer Tarar urged journalists on Tuesday to exercise caution when discussing the country’s foreign policy, saying constitutional limits must be respected as regional tensions rise following the escalating conflict in the Middle East.

Tarar said citizens have the right to receive accurate information and express their views, but warned that public debate on sensitive diplomatic matters could cross constitutional boundaries and trigger legal consequences.

His remarks come as tensions in the Gulf have intensified after coordinated strikes by the United States and Israel against Iran on Feb. 28, followed by retaliatory Iranian attacks targeting American bases and infrastructure in several Arab states.

The crisis has complicated diplomatic balancing for countries such as Pakistan that maintain ties across the region.

“Journalism is such a profession, and particularly given the way information flows today, it is the right of every person living in Pakistan that correct information should reach them, and every individual also has the right to express what is in their heart,” Tarar told the media.

“However, we cannot ignore constitutional limits and restrictions,” he said, adding that criticism often arises when authorities register criminal cases or initiate prosecution after those limits were crossed.

The minister said debate that frames Pakistan’s foreign policy choices in binary terms — such as whether the country stands with Iran or Gulf states — risks undermining delicate diplomatic relations.

He maintained even the Constitution of Pakistan does not permit people to casually comment on such issues, adding that the public should trust the state in managing these matters.

“Your constitution, which is the fundamental document and the social contract with the state, the agreement between the state and its citizens about how life is to be conducted here, also obliges you to exercise great caution in such discussions and commentary, as they do not fall within the bounds of freedom of expression,” he said.

The remarks come amid debate in the country about limits of online free speech, as authorities frequently invoked the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) to pursue cases related to digital content.

Critics say the law has been used to curb dissent and intimidate journalists and activists, while the government maintains it is necessary to combat misinformation, cybercrime and threats to national security.

Tarar said legal action should not automatically be viewed as excessive if authorities enforce constitutional limits.

“Every profession also has a basic responsibility to conduct itself within the limits of the law,” he added.