Saudi Arabia pulls in most of Partners for Growth $450m capital push

Partners for Growth lends to emerging tech and innovation companies, particularly those that struggle to access traditional credit. (Supplied)
Short Url
Updated 07 February 2026
Follow

Saudi Arabia pulls in most of Partners for Growth $450m capital push

  • Global private credit fund leans into region’s largest market for growth-stage technology financing

RIYADH: Saudi Arabia has captured the vast majority of Partners for Growth’s capital deployed in the Gulf Cooperation Council, as the global private credit fund leans into what it sees as the region’s largest market for growth-stage technology financing. 

The San Francisco-based firm has deployed about $450 million in commitments in the GCC, and “the vast majority of that is in Saudi,” said Armineh Baghoomian, managing director at the firm who also serves as head of Europe, the Middle East and Africa and co-head of global fintech. 

The company was one of the earliest lenders to Saudi fintech unicorn Tabby, and it’s clear the Kingdom is providing fertile territory for ongoing investments.

“We don’t target a specific country because of some other mandate. It’s just a larger market in the region, so in the types of deals we’re doing, it ends up weighing heavily to Saudi Arabia,” Baghoomian said. 

Partners for Growth, which Baghoomian described as a global private credit fund focused on “growth debt solutions,” lends to emerging tech and innovation companies, particularly those that struggle to access traditional credit. 

“We’re going into our 22nd year,” she said, tracing the strategy back to its roots in a Bay Area investment bank debt practice in the mid-1980s. 

Today, the firm lends globally, she said, deploying capital where it sees fit across markets including Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, as well as Latin America and the GCC, where it has been active for about six years. 

Shariah structures dominate PFG’s Gulf deals 

In the Gulf, the firm’s structures are often shaped by local expectations. “Most of the deals we’ve done in the region are Shariah-compliant,” Baghoomian said. 

“In terms of dollars we’ve deployed, they’re Shariah-structured,” she added. 

“Usually it’s the entrepreneur who requires that, or requests it, and we’re happy to structure it,” Baghoomian said, adding that the firm also views Shariah structures as “a better security position in certain regions.” 

Growth debt steps in where banks cannot 

Baghoomian framed growth debt as a practical complement to equity for companies that have moved beyond the earliest stage but are not yet “bankable.” 

She said: “The lower-cost bank type facilities don’t exist. There’s that gap.”

Baghoomian added that companies want to grow, “but they don’t want to keep selling big chunks of equity. That implies giving up control and ownership.” 

For businesses with the fundamentals private credit providers look for, she said, debt can extend runway while limiting dilution. 

“As long as they have predictable revenue, clear unit economics, and the right assets that can be financed, this is a nice solution to continue their path,” she added. 

That role becomes more pronounced as equity becomes harder to raise at later stages, Baghoomian believes. 

She pointed to a gap that “might be widening” around “series B-plus” fundraising, as later-stage investors become “more discriminating” about which deals they back. 

Asset-heavy fintechs cannot scale on equity alone 

For asset-heavy technology businesses, Baghoomian argued, debt is not just an option but a necessity. 

She pointed to buy-now-pay-later platform Tabby as an example of a model built on funding working capital at scale. 

“Tabby is an asset-heavy business,” she said. “They’re providing installment plans to consumers, but they still need to pay the merchant on day one. That’s capital-intensive. You need a lot of cash to do that.” 

Equity alone, she added, would be structurally inefficient. “You would not want to just raise equity. The founders, employees, everyone would own nothing and lose a lot of control.” 

We don’t target a specific country because of some other mandate. It’s just a larger market in the region, so in the types of deals we’re doing, it ends up weighing heavily to Saudi Arabia.

Armineh Baghoomian, PFG managing director and head of Europe, the Middle East and Africa and co-head of global fintech

Baghoomian said those dynamics are common across other asset-intensive models, including lending platforms and businesses that trade in large inventories such as vehicles or property. “Those are businesses that inherently end up having to raise quite a bit of credit,” she said. Partners for Growth’s relationship with Tabby also reflects how early the firm can deploy capital when the structure is asset-backed. “We started with Tabby with $10 million after their seed round, and then we grew, and we continue to be a lender to them,” Baghoomian said. 

“On the asset-backed side, we can go in quite early,” she said. “Most of the fintechs we work with are very early stage, post-seed, and then we’ll grow with them for as long as possible.” 

As the market for private credit expands in the Gulf, Baghoomian emphasized discipline — both for lenders and borrowers. 

For investors assessing startups seeking debt, she said the key is revenue quality and predictability, not just topline growth. “Revenue is one thing, but how predictable is it? How consistent is it? Is it growing?” she said. “This credit is not permanent capital. You have to pay it back. There’s a servicing element to it.” 

Her advice to founders was more blunt: stress-test the downside before taking leverage. 

“You have to do a stress test and ask: if growth slows by 30 to 40 percent, can I still service the debt? Can I still pay back what I’ve taken?” she said. 

Baghoomian warned against chasing the biggest facility on offer. “Sometimes companies compete on how much a lender is providing them,” she said. “We try to teach founders: take as much as you need, but not as much as you can. You have to pay that back.” 

Partners for Growth positions itself as an alternative to banks not only because many growth-stage companies cannot access bank financing, but because it can tailor structures to each business. 

HIGHLIGHTS

• Partners for Growth positions itself as an alternative to banks not only because many growth-stage companies cannot access bank financing, but because it can tailor structures to each business.

• The firm lends globally deploying capital where it sees fit across markets including Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia, as well as Latin America and the GCC, where it has been active for about six years.

One of Partners for Growth’s differentiators, Baghoomian said, is how bespoke its financing is compared with bank products. 

“These facilities are very bespoke. They’re custom to each company and how they need to use the money,” she said, adding that the fund is not offering founders a rigid menu of standardized options. 

“No two deals of ours look alike,” she said, framing that flexibility as especially important at the growth stage, when business needs can shift quickly. 

That customization, she added, extends beyond signing. Baghoomian said the firm aims to structure facilities so companies can actually deploy capital without being constrained, adding: “We don’t want to handcuff you. We don’t want to constrain you in any way.” 

As a company evolves, she said the financing can evolve too, because what works on day one often won’t fit nine months later. 

“We’ll revise structures,” she said, describing flexibility as core to how private credit can serve fast-moving tech businesses. 

She added that a global lender can also bring operating support and market pattern recognition, while still accounting for local nuance. 

Baghoomian expects demand for private credit in the Gulf to keep rising. “They are going to require credit, for sure,” she said, pointing to the scale of new platforms and projects. 

“I don’t see it shrinking,” she said, adding that Partners for Growth is seeing more demand and is in late-stage discussions with several companies, though she declined to name them. 

PFG to stay selective despite rising competition 

Competition among lenders has increased since the firm began deploying in the region, Baghoomian said, calling that “very healthy for the ecosystem.” 

Most of what the firm does in the region is asset-backed, Baghoomian said, often through first warehouse facilities for businesses financing receivables or other tangible exposures, “almost always Shariah.” 

Keeping Egypt on its watchlist 

Beyond the Gulf, Baghoomian said the firm is monitoring Egypt closely, though macroeconomic volatility has delayed deployments. 

“We looked at Egypt very aggressively a few years ago, and then the macro issues changed,” she said, adding that the firm continues to speak with companies in the country and track conditions. 

Even as private credit becomes more common in the region, Baghoomian underscored that debt is not universally appropriate. 

“Not every company should take a loan or credit,” she said. “You don’t take it just to take it. It should be getting you to the next milestone.” 


Oil markets ‘in panic mode’ as analysts warn of even greater disruption

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Oil markets ‘in panic mode’ as analysts warn of even greater disruption

RIYADH: Oil prices climbed above $100 a barrel on March 9 for the first time since 2022 as conflict between the US-Israel alliance and Iran continued, but analysts believe more shocks could be on the way.

The immediate concern for oil markets is no longer only the initial price shock, but how long supply and storage buffers can absorb a prolonged disruption to flows through Hormuz, a chokepoint that handles a large share of Gulf crude and liquefied natural gas exports. 

A further escalation around Iran’s Kharg Island export hub could deepen the shock. JPMorgan described the location as the backbone of Iran’s crude export system, handling about 90 percent of the country’s shipments and serving as the main outlet for pipelines from its largest producing fields. 

In that scenario, regional supply disruptions could deepen significantly, with an additional 1 million to 1.5 million barrels per day of losses potentially pushing total outages to at least 5 million barrels per day, or more than 8 million barrels per day including refined products. 

“Oil markets have entered panic mode,” said Norbert Rucker, head of economics at Julius Baer. “Prices surged into the triple digits as the Iran war raises stress levels,” he added.

JPMorgan said the latest phase of the conflict had already resulted in major shut-ins across the region, with Iraqi output down by about 3.2 million barrels per day, Kuwait losing as much as 300,000 barrels per day, and the UAE beginning to curb supply. 

The bank projected regional shut-ins could exceed 4 million barrels per day by the end of next week if storage fills and bottlenecks persist. 

Rucker said the supply disruption so far was being driven less by direct physical damage than by the breakdown in trade flows through the Gulf. 

“Most of this move seems to come from sentiment, as tangible and significant fundamental shifts of the conflict are not visible,” he said. 

The analyst added that the disruption was “mainly about choked trade as ships avoid the Strait of Hormuz for precautionary reasons, not because of a military blockade.” 

JPMorgan warned that if the terminal at Kharg Island were disabled or seized, total regional losses could rise sharply and visible shortages could begin to emerge within a week as pre-conflict cargoes are absorbed and new loadings stall. 

Other Gulf producers have tried to limit the damage by diverting cargoes through alternative routes, but those workarounds are limited. 

Emirates NBD said ADNOC is using infrastructure that bypasses the strait and international storage facilities, while Saudi Aramco has adjusted cargo operations to divert crude to the Red Sea. 

UBS similarly said Saudi Arabia and the UAE have more storage and pipeline alternatives than Iraq and Kuwait. 

The market reaction may still prove temporary if the conflict does not broaden further. 

“For the economy to take a hit from a lasting energy price shock, the conflict in the Middle East would need to severely escalate, far beyond current dynamics,” Rucker said. 

He added that meaningful infrastructure damage remained absent and that Julius Baer’s base case remained a short-lived but intense spike in energy prices. 

Gas markets are also under strain. QatarEnergy has halted LNG production and declared force majeure on shipments to affected buyers, underscoring the broader energy market risk from a continued blockage. 

Importing governments have already begun responding to contain the inflationary fallout from higher fuel costs, with several countries preparing or considering strategic reserve releases and other emergency measures. 

The disruption has also triggered force majeure declarations across the Gulf, with Bahrain’s Bapco Energies making the announcement following an attack on its refinery complex, highlighting how the conflict is beginning to affect producers’ ability to meet export commitments. 

Kuwait’s state-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corporation has also declared force majeure and begun cutting crude production after exports were effectively halted and tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz was disrupted.