Democratic US lawmakers say they were misled on Venezuela, demand a plan

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer speaks to reporters after a meeting with US President Joe Biden and Congressional leadership at the White House in Washington, DC, on February 27, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 04 January 2026
Follow

Democratic US lawmakers say they were misled on Venezuela, demand a plan

  • Lawmakers said they wanted more guidance on Trump’s plans for Venezuela, ‌after he told reporters ‌he would put the country under US control, for now

WASHINGTON: Democratic members of the US Congress said on Saturday that senior officials of President Donald Trump’s administration had misled them during recent briefings about ​plans for Venezuela by insisting they were not planning regime change in Caracas.
The US attacked Venezuela and deposed its long-serving President Nicolas Maduro in an overnight operation, in Washington’s most direct intervention in Latin America since the 1989 invasion of Panama.
Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democrats’ leader in the Senate, said he had been told in three classified briefings that the administration was not pursuing regime change or planning to take military action in Venezuela.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Members of both parties had long clamored for more information

• Some Democrats say Trump administration lied to Congress

• Trump says mission kept secret from Congress to avoid ‘leaks’

• US Constitution gives Congress, not the president, sole power to declare war

“They assured me that they were not pursuing those things,” Schumer said on a call with reporters. “Clearly they’re not being straight with the American people.”
Schumer said he had not been briefed by Saturday afternoon and called for the administration to fill in not just congressional and intelligence committee leaders, but also all lawmakers by early next week.
“They’ve kept everyone in the total dark,” he said.
Lawmakers said they wanted more guidance on Trump’s plans for Venezuela, ‌after he told reporters ‌he would put the country under US control, for now.
“No serious plan has been presented ‌for ⁠how such ​an extraordinary undertaking ‌would work or what it will cost the American people. History offers no shortage of warnings about the costs – human, strategic, and moral – of assuming we can govern another nation by force,” said Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The Senate is due to vote next week on whether to block further military action against Venezuela without congressional approval.
Trump told reporters he was open to the idea of sending US ground troops into Venezuela, a prospect that has rattled some US lawmakers, including Republican Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa, who faces a potentially difficult re-election campaign in November.
Meeks called the US action in Venezuela “a national security issue,” but said in a Fox News interview: “Iowans do not want troops on the ground in Venezuela.”
In briefings in November and ⁠December by officials including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, lawmakers said they were told repeatedly that there were no plans for a land invasion inside Venezuela and that the ‌administration was not focused on regime change.
“Instead, the Administration consistently misled the American people and ‍their elected representatives,” Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat ‍on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement.
The Pentagon, State Department and White House did not immediately respond to a request for ‍comment.

SOME LAWMAKERS SAY ADMINISTRATION LIED
Several lawmakers said they felt they had been lied to.
“The Administration lied to Congress and launched an illegal war for regime change and oil,” Democratic Representative Don Beyer of Virginia said on X. Beyer’s district includes the Pentagon, just across the river from Washington.
At a news conference on Saturday, Trump said Congress had not been kept fully informed because of concerns that word about his plans would get out. “Congress does have a tendency to leak,” Trump told reporters.
Members of ​Congress, including some of Trump’s fellow Republicans as well as Democrats, had been clamoring for more information about his strategy toward the oil-rich South American nation since September, when he began a military build-up in the Caribbean and ordered strikes on ⁠boats he said were carrying drugs.
“When we had briefings on Venezuela, we asked, ‘Are you going to invade the country?’ We were told no. ‘Do you plan to put troops on the ground?’ We were told no. ‘Do you intend regime change in Venezuela?’ We were told no,” Democratic Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts said on CNN. “So in a sense, we have been briefed, we’ve just been completely lied to.”
Lawmakers said they were not briefed before the operation, although Rubio called some members of Congress after it took place. Democratic and Republican congressional leaders said they hoped to arrange some briefings after lawmakers return to Washington on January 5 following their year-end recess.
Most Republicans praised Trump’s action and have declined to discuss what has been said in classified briefings.
“President Trump’s decisive action to disrupt the unacceptable status quo and apprehend Maduro, through the execution of a valid Department of Justice warrant, is an important first step to bring him to justice for the drug crimes for which he has been indicted in the United States,” said Senate Republican Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota.
Republican Representative Mario Diaz-Balart, at a press conference in his home state of Florida, said that with Maduro removed from power in Venezuela, the “tyrannies” of Cuba and Nicaragua’s leaders were also in jeopardy. “The next two, ‌their days are also counted,” he said.
Other members of Congress have long accused presidents from both parties of seeking to sidestep the Constitution’s requirement that Congress, not the president, approve anything other than brief and limited military action needed to defend the United States. 

 


Three more UK pro-Palestinian activists end hunger strike

Updated 58 min 54 sec ago
Follow

Three more UK pro-Palestinian activists end hunger strike

  • The detainees are due to stand trial for alleged break-ins or criminal damage on behalf of the Palestine Action campaign group before it was banned under anti-terrorism laws

LONDON: Three detained pro-Palestinian activists awaiting trial in the UK have ended their hunger strike after 73 days, a campaign group said.
The three began “refeeding” on Wednesday, Prisoners for Palestine said in a statement late on Wednesday.
The decision leaves just one person still on hunger strike who started six days ago, it confirmed to AFP. Four others called off their hunger strike earlier.
The detainees are due to stand trial for alleged break-ins or criminal damage on behalf of the Palestine Action campaign group before it was banned under anti-terrorism laws.
They deny the charges.
The group, aged 20-31, launched their hunger strike in November in protest at their treatment and called for their release from prison on bail as they await trial.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer previously said in parliament that all “rules and procedures” were being followed in their cases.
His government outlawed Palestine Action in July after activists, protesting the war in Gaza, broke into a UK air force base and caused an estimated £7 million ($9.3 million) of damage.
Some of those on hunger strike are charged in relation to that incident.
The inmates’ demands included that the government lift its Palestine Action ban and close an Israel-linked defense firm.
Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori challenged the ban last July, and High Court judges are expected to rule at a later date on whether to uphold the prohibition.