Top ex-British Army officers urge complete arms embargo on Israel

Members of the public walk past the Ministry of Defence Building in central London, hours after members of Youth Demand and Palestine Action have spayed red paint onto the brickwork to demand that the political parties in the UK impose a two-way arms embargo on Israel and end the development and production of fossil fuels in the UK, on April 10, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 24 December 2025
Follow

Top ex-British Army officers urge complete arms embargo on Israel

  • Evidence of war crimes in Gaza is ‘so well documented and compelling’
  • Appeal made in letter to UK PM ‘to avoid the charge of complicity’

LONDON: Four former senior members of the British Army have urged the government to impose a complete arms embargo on Israel, The Times reported.

They also called for a ban on any British involvement in Israeli-owned or Israeli-supported arms manufacturers.

The appeal came in a letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in which the signatories said that amid Gaza’s fragile ceasefire, “now is not the time to return to business as usual with the Israeli government.” More severe sanctions must be placed on Israel, they said.

The letter was signed by John Deverell, a retired brigadier general who served for more than 30 years, and Sir Andrew Graham, a retired lieutenant general and former director general of the Defence Academy of the UK. Deverell was defense attache in Saudi Arabia and Yemen at the time of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Maj. Gen Peter Currie and Maj. Gen. Charlie Herbert, a former senior British Army commander in Afghanistan, are also signatories.

The army is set to decide next year whether to award the British subsidiary of Elbit Systems, a major weapons company, a £2 billion ($2.7 billion) training contract for soldiers, aimed at future preparedness.

Elbit Systems UK is part of a consortium of defense companies bidding for the substantial 15-year contract offered by the British Army. Raytheon UK leads the competing consortium.

The signatories strongly pushed back against a claim that Israel’s military had followed similar protocols to the British Army during the war on Gaza.

They challenged remarks by a senior UK Ministry of Defence source who said: “Israel appears to have thorough and rigorous processes for the conduct of hostilities and targeting, that in many respects resemble our own.”

They said British military practices have clear differences with Israel’s ones, including the latter’s indiscriminate firing of munitions that led to “exceptionally disproportionate and avoidable civilian fatalities, and widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure.”

They added that the UK should ban Israeli officers from attending British military courses, and prevent UK defense officials from taking part in visits to Israel.

The letter also highlighted the issue of famine in Gaza, noting that more than 100 humanitarian organizations have expressed grave concerns over conditions in the war-torn Palestinian enclave.

Israel’s military had frequently targeted hospitals, schools and other sites essential for civilian survival, they said, citing humanitarian groups.

The signatories also referred to high-profile reports of Palestinian detainees facing torture in Israeli custody.

Evidence of Israeli war crimes is “so well documented and compelling that the British government should cut all military collaboration with Israel forthwith, to avoid the charge of complicity,” they said.

The group also called on the UK government to prevent the use of Royal Air Force or British-contracted aircraft in any Israeli military activities. Britain should also suspend any transfer of military technology to Israel, they said.


Philippines builds defense partnerships amid growing China aggression

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Philippines builds defense partnerships amid growing China aggression

  • Island country forged new pacts with Japan, the UAE, Canada, Germany in past year
  • Manila sees China’s maritime expansion as ‘quintessential security threat,’ expert says

MANILA: The Philippines and Japan have signed a new defense pact, adding to a growing list of security cooperation Manila has been forging with partner countries as it faces a growing Chinese presence in the disputed South China Sea.

Philippine-Japan security ties have strengthened in recent years over shared concerns in the region, with the two countries signing a landmark military pact in 2024, allowing the deployment of their forces on each other’s soil for joint military drills. It was Japan’s first such pact in Asia.

The new defense agreement — signed by Philippine Foreign Secretary Theresa Lazaro and Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi in Manila on Thursday — is a follow-up to their 2024 pact, and would allow tax-free, reciprocal provision of ammunition, fuel, food and other necessities when their forces conduct joint training and disaster relief operations.

The security partnership is aimed at boosting deterrence against China, experts say.

“The latest defense pact with Japan is not only significant but also existential (as) a strong deterrence to China’s growing military size and ambition in the string of islands of the first island chain that includes Japan and the Philippines,” Chester Cabalza, founding president of the International Development and Security Cooperation think tank, told Arab News.

The Philippines, China and several other countries have overlapping claims in the disputed South China Sea, a strategic waterway through which billions of dollars worth of goods pass each year.

Beijing has maintained its expansive claims of the area, despite a 2016 international tribunal ruling that China’s historical assertion to it had no basis.

Japan has a longstanding territorial dispute with China over islands in the East China Sea, while Chinese and Philippine coast guard and navy ships have been involved in a series of tense incidents in the South China Sea in recent years.

“The imminent threat to maintain a status quo of peaceful co-existence in the region brings a shared responsibility for Manila and Tokyo to elevate strategic partnership to achieve this strategic equilibrium,” he said.

Motegi said he and Lazaro “concurred on continuing to oppose unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force or coercion in the East and South China seas,” in a clear rebuke of Beijing’s increasing assertiveness, without naming China.

The Philippines sees China’s maritime expansion as “the quintessential security threat,” said international studies expert Prof. Renato De Castro.

“So, of course, we rely on our efforts to build up our armed forces in terms of the comprehensive archipelagic defense operation,” he told Arab News.

The Philippines has a mutual defense treaty with the US, which the allies signed in 1951. While both governments have continued to deepen defense cooperation in recent years, Manila has also been building security partnerships with other countries.

The Philippines has signed two defense deals this month alone, including a Memorandum of Understanding on Defense Cooperation with the UAE, its first such deal with a Gulf country.

Last year, Manila signed military pacts with New Zealand and Canada, which sets the legal framework to allow military engagements, including joint drills, in each other’s territory. Both agreements still need to be ratified by the Philippine Senate to take effect.

The Philippines also signed a defense cooperation arrangement with Germany in May, aimed at boosting joint activities.