Zionist activists deface Palestinian Embassy in London as envoy calls for security upgrades

On Sept. 22, the embassy hosted a flag-raising ceremony after the UK formally recognized the Palestinian state. (AN Photo/Mustafa Abu Sneineh)
Short Url
Updated 06 December 2025
Follow

Zionist activists deface Palestinian Embassy in London as envoy calls for security upgrades

  • Masked group waved Israeli flags outside the building and plastered facade with stickers
  • The embassy was upgraded from a mission this year after UK’s recognition of Palestinian state

LONDON: Palestine’s ambassador to the UK, Husam Zomlot, has appealed for “comprehensive protection” after a group of Zionist activists attacked his embassy last Saturday, The Guardian has reported.

Masked activists were seen waving Israeli flags while posing at the entrance to the embassy in Hammersmith, west London. The building was also plastered with stickers bearing phrases including “I love the IDF.”

On Sept. 22, the embassy hosted a flag-raising ceremony after the UK formally recognized the Palestinian state, upgrading the diplomatic status of what had previously been the Palestinian mission to Britain.

Despite the upgrade, no changes to security arrangements have been made, and fears are now mounting over the safety of its staff.

A post on Facebook called for another demonstration outside the building on Friday, Dec. 5.

It said: “A hardcore group of Zionists have decided it’s time for direct action to challenge the haters and give them a taste of their own medicine. Bring your union jack and Israeli flags and your megaphones.

“We’re calling for an end to Hamas and PIJ (Palestinian Islamic Jihad) terrorism once and for all.”

The embassy has no affiliation with either militant group, and is part of the Palestinian Authority.

Zomlot said: “To those responsible, we clearly say your actions will not deter us. We will continue to advance Palestine-UK relations and defend the rights and lives of the Palestinian people.

“We have formally requested the British authorities to provide immediate and comprehensive protection for the embassy and our personnel from such attacks. We call on them to investigate this incident fully and hold those responsible accountable.”

In 2023, when the embassy was still the Palestinian mission, its staff reported four attacks in the space of a few weeks. They also received death threats.

Officials said that the lack of diplomatic protection provided to embassy staff had been “inexplicable and unacceptable.”

Other stickers posted on the building last week included one with a star of David placed over the union flag with the slogan: “We are not Jews trembling at the knees.”

Host states of missions and embassies are required to undertake a “special duty” to protect premises from damage or surveillance, according to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

In a statement, the Palestinian Embassy described the events of last Saturday as a “flagrant breach of diplomatic laws and customs and the rules of international law.”

Palestinian missions outside of the UK, including in France, often receive permanent security and their ambassadors are sometimes given close protection.

A spokesperson for London’s Metropolitan Police told The Guardian: “We take the security and safety of the diplomatic community extremely seriously. Security arrangements at diplomatic premises, overseen by the Met’s parliamentary and diplomatic protection command, are based on an assessment of risk and are constantly reviewed.”


Russia awaits an answer from the US on New START as nuclear treaty ticks down

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Russia awaits an answer from the US on New START as nuclear treaty ticks down

  • Russian leader Vladimir Putin has proposed keeping the treaty’s limits
  • US President Donald Trump has said Putin’s proposal sounded ‘like a good idea’
MOSCOW: Russia on Wednesday said it was still awaiting a formal answer from Washington on President Vladimir Putin’s proposal to jointly stick to the last remaining Russian-US arms control treaty, which expires in less than two months.
New START, which runs out on February 5, caps the number of strategic nuclear warheads that the United States and Russia can deploy, and the deployment of land- and submarine-based missiles and bombers to deliver them.
Putin in September offered to voluntarily maintain for one year the limits on deployed strategic nuclear weapons set out in the treaty, whose initials stand for the (New) Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.
Trump said in October it sounded “like a good idea.”
“We have less than 100 days left before the expiry of New START,” said Sergei Shoigu, the secretary of Russia’s powerful Security Council, which is like a modern-day politburo of Russia’s most powerful officials.
“We are waiting for a response,” Shoigu told reporters during a visit to Hanoi. He added that Moscow’s proposal was an opportunity to halt the “destructive movement” that currently existed in nuclear arms control.
Nuclear arms control in peril
Russia and the US together have more than 10,000 nuclear warheads, or 87 percent of the global inventory of nuclear weapons. China is the world’s third largest nuclear power with about 600 warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists.
The arms control treaties between Moscow and Washington were born out of fear of nuclear war after the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. Greater transparency about the opponent’s arsenal was intended to reduce the scope for misunderstanding and slow the arms race.
US and Russia eye China’s nuclear arsenal
Now, with all major nuclear powers seeking to modernize their arsenals, and Russia and the West at strategic loggerheads for over a decade — not least over the enlargement of NATO and Moscow’s war in Ukraine — the treaties have almost all crumbled away. Each side blames the other.
In the new US National Security Strategy, the Trump administration says it wants to reestablish strategic stability with Russia” — shorthand for reopening discussions on strategic nuclear arms control.
Rose Gottemoeller, who was chief US negotiator for New START, said in an article for The Arms Control Association this month that it would be beneficial for Washington to implement the treaty along with Moscow.
“For the United States, the benefit of this move would be buying more time to decide what to do about the ongoing Chinese buildup without having to worry simultaneously about new Russian deployments,” Gottemoeller said.