Trump to scrap Biden’s fuel-economy standards, sparking climate outcry

President Donald Trump speaks during an event on fuel economy standards in the Oval Office of the White House, Wednesday, Dec. 3, 2025, in Washington. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 04 December 2025
Follow

Trump to scrap Biden’s fuel-economy standards, sparking climate outcry

  • “My administration is taking historic action to lower costs for American consumers, protect American auto jobs and make buying a car much more affordable,” the president says

WASHINGTON, United States: President Donald Trump announced Wednesday a rollback of Joe Biden’s fuel-economy standards, arguing it will lower US car prices — but critics warned it would worsen climate change and leave drivers paying more to re-fuel.
Trump was joined in the Oval Office by the CEOs of Ford and Stellantis, as well as a General Motors official to announce the move, signaling buy-in from the “Big Three” automakers.
“My administration is taking historic action to lower costs for American consumers, protect American auto jobs and make buying a car much more affordable,” the president said.
“Today is a victory (for) common sense and affordability,” Ford CEO Jim Farley chipped in.
Environmentalists quickly pushed back, saying the move stood out even among Trump’s many anti-green actions because of its outsized impact on car-dependent America.
“Trump is taking a wrecking ball to the biggest single step any nation has ever taken to combat oil use, global warming pollution, and helping save consumers money at the gas pump,” Dan Becker, an activist with the Center for Biological Diversity, told AFP. “This is the big one.”
At stake are the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, created in 1975 in response to the Arab oil embargo, which require vehicles to achieve the “maximum feasible” mileage per gallon.
The full extent of the rollback was not immediately clear.
But the Trump administration has repeatedly signaled opposition to efficiency increases enacted under Joe Biden’s administration, which boosted targets by 8-10 percent, aiming for more than 50 miles per gallon by 2031.
Trump’s Department of Transport has argued that Biden officials improperly factored in electric and hybrid vehicles, saying the standards would be unattainable for gasoline-powered cars and would effectively force a shift in the market.
Becker called that argument “ludicrous” because it would force automakers to ignore that advanced technology exists.

Trump EV fight

Trump has railed against what he calls an EV “mandate” — an issue that has put him at odds with his on-again, off-again billionaire ally Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, which still has the highest EV market share in the United States.
Republicans in Congress have repealed clean-energy tax credits in a major tax and spending bill, and targeted California’s ability to set its own vehicle-emission limits.
Throughout 2025, GM and other US automakers have curtailed or pushed back new EV plant capacity.
But whether savings from reduced EV investment will filter through to consumers remains unclear.
While the shift away from EVs does allow automakers to delay or forgo billions of dollars in new investments, some funds are being steered into new initiatives to add US carbuilding capacity in light of Trump’s tariffs.
“Meeting high fuel economy standards has been challenging for the auto industry and has added to vehicle cost,” Charlie Chesbrough, an analyst with Cox Automotive, told AFP.
“However, consumers like fuel efficient vehicles. This year traditional hybrids are up double digits from last year while gas vehicles are basically flat,” he added.
“Since most consumers don’t have transportation alternatives available, people fear high gas prices. And good MPG is a way to mitigate that risk.”
Gina McCarthy, a former senior official under Biden and Barack Obama, said the move would harm the auto industry by slowing its shift to electric vehicles and worsen climate change.
“The rest of the world will continue to innovate and create cleaner cars that people want to buy and drive, while we’re forced to sit in our clunkers, paying more for gas, and pumping out more tailpipe emissions.”


35 million Nigerians ‘risk hunger after global funding collapse’

Updated 23 January 2026
Follow

35 million Nigerians ‘risk hunger after global funding collapse’

  • The UN can only aim to ‌deliver $516 million to provide lifesaving aid to 2.5 million people this year, down from 3.6 million in 2025, which in turn was about half the previous year’s level

ABUJA: Nearly 35 million Nigerians are at risk of hunger this year, including 3 million children facing severe malnutrition, ​the UN said, following the collapse of global aid budgets.
Speaking at the launch of the 2026 humanitarian plan in Abuja, UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator Mohammed Malick Fall said the long-dominant, foreign-led aid model in Nigeria is no longer sustainable and ‌that Nigeria’s ‌needs have grown. 
Conditions in ‌the conflict-hit ​northeast ‌are dire, Fall said, with civilians in Borno, Adamawa, and Yobe states facing rising violence. 

BACKGROUND

UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator Mohammed Malick Fall said the foreign-led aid model in Nigeria is no longer sustainable and ‌that the country’s needs have grown.

A surge in terror attacks killed more than 4,000 people in the first eight months of 2025, matching the toll for all of 2023, he said.
The UN can only aim to ‌deliver $516 million to provide lifesaving aid to 2.5 million people this year, down from 3.6 million in 2025, which in turn was about half the previous year’s level.
“These are not statistics. These numbers represent lives, futures, and Nigerians,” Fall said.
He also said ​the UN had no choice but to focus on “the most lifesaving” interventions given the drop in available funding. 
Shortfalls last year led the World Food Programme to also warn that millions could go hungry in Nigeria as its resources ran out in December and it was forced to cut support for more than 300,000 children. 
Fall said Nigeria was showing growing national ownership of the crisis response in recent months through measures such as local funding for ‌lean-season food support and early-warning action on flooding.