Calls for accountability over lethal Hong Kong fire silenced

A police officer wearing personal protective equipment works near a window of a burned building at the Wang Fuk Court housing complex after the deadly fire, in Tai Po, Hong Kong, China. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 30 November 2025
Follow

Calls for accountability over lethal Hong Kong fire silenced

  • Police declined to confirm the arrest, saying only that they “will take actions according to actual circumstances and in accordance with the law”

HONG KONG: Not long before he was reportedly detained, Miles Kwan approached commuters outside a Hong Kong train station, urging them to demand accountability for the deadly inferno that tore through nearby apartment blocks.
“We all feel unhappy that (Hong Kong) has come to this and we want things to improve,” the 24-year-old student told AFP on Friday, while handing out flyers that called for an independent probe into the blaze, which killed at least 128 people this week.
“We need to be frank about how today’s Hong Kong is riddled with holes, inside and out.”
Kwan and other organizers’ demands turned into an online petition that gained more than 10,000 signatures in less than a day.
But local media reported on Saturday night that Kwan was arrested on suspicion of sedition by national security police and the text of the online petition had been deleted, showing how under Beijing’s watchful eye, dissenting voices in Hong Kong can vanish as quickly as they appear.
Police declined to confirm the arrest, saying only that they “will take actions according to actual circumstances and in accordance with the law.”
AFP’s attempts to reach Kwan by phone on Sunday morning went unanswered.
Hong Kong was once home to spirited political activism, but that has faded since Beijing imposed a strict national security law in 2020 following huge pro-democracy protests in the Chinese finance hub.
Kwan was reportedly detained not long after Beijing’s national security arm in Hong Kong publicly condemned “anti-China forces” for exploiting the disaster and “inciting social division and stirring hatred against authorities.”
Asked on Friday if he feared being arrested, Kwan told AFP he was only “proposing very basic demands.”
“If these ideas are deemed seditious or ‘crossing the line’, then I feel I can’t predict the consequences of anything anymore, and I can only do what I truly believe.”

- Grenfell comparisons -

Kwan and a handful of activists gave out flyers at the train station near the charred residential estate on Friday, demanding government accountability, an independent probe into possible corruption, proper resettlement for residents and a review of construction oversight.
The demands reflected a belief that the fire was “not an accident” but a man-made disaster, he said.
Authorities have arrested 11 people in connection to the blaze that tore through the high-rise blocks of Wang Fuk Court, the world’s deadliest residential building fire since 1980.
Hong Kong has previously used judge-led commissions of inquiry (COI) to undertake complex fact-finding exercises in a public forum — a practice left over from British colonial rule.
By contrast, city officials have so far announced only an inter-departmental task force to investigate the blaze.
When Britain was grappling with public fury over the devastating Grenfell Tower fire in 2017, which killed 72 people, the government announced a public inquiry.
Lawyer Imran Khan, who represented the bereaved and survivors in the inquiry, told AFP “the lessons from Grenfell apply around the world” as all governments need to ensure high-rise residential buildings are safe.
Khan said a public inquiry with court-like powers was a better option for the situation in Hong Kong because “an internal investigation will not get to the truth and there will be no faith in it by the bereaved, survivors and residents.”
Based on his experience with Grenfell residents, he said, “without justice they cannot grieve.”
At the Hong Kong station on Friday, many commuters took the flyers demanding action, though few stopped to chat with Kwan or his companions.
Near the site of the blaze a short walk away, a long queue snaked through a park as mourners brought flowers and handwritten notes of remembrance.
One unsigned note left on the ground read, “This is not just an accident, it is the evil fruit of an unjust system, which landed on you. It’s not right.”


Ukraine’s Zelensky: We have backed US peace proposals to get a deal done

Updated 13 February 2026
Follow

Ukraine’s Zelensky: We have backed US peace proposals to get a deal done

  • “The tactic we chose is for the Americans not to think that we want to continue the war,” Zelensky ‌told The Atlantic

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Kyiv ‌had sought to back US peace proposals to end the war with Russia as President Donald Trump seeks to resolve the conflict before ​November mid-term elections.
Zelensky, in an interview published by The Atlantic on Thursday, said Kyiv was willing to hold both a presidential election and a referendum on a deal, but would not settle for an accord that was detrimental to Ukraine’s interests.
“The tactic we chose is for the Americans not to think that we want to continue the war,” Zelensky ‌told the ‌US-based publication. “That’s why we started supporting their ​proposals in ‌any ⁠format ​that speeds ⁠things along.”
He said Ukraine was “not afraid of anything. Are we ready for elections? We’re ready. Are we ready for a referendum? We’re ready.”
Zelensky has sought to build good relations with Washington since an Oval Office meeting in February 2025 descended into a shouting match with Trump and US Vice President JD ⁠Vance.
But he said he had rejected a ‌proposal, reported this week by the ‌Financial Times, to announce the votes ​on February 24, the fourth ‌anniversary of Russia’s invasion. A ceasefire and proposed US security ‌guarantees against a future invasion had not yet been settled, he said.
“No one is clinging to power,” The Atlantic quoted him as saying. “I am ready for elections. But for that we need security, guarantees ‌of security, a ceasefire.”
And he added: “I don’t think we should put a bad deal ⁠up for a ⁠referendum.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Zelensky is not a legitimate negotiating partner because he has not faced election since coming to power in 2019.
Zelensky has said in recent weeks that a document on security guarantees for Ukraine is all but ready to be signed.
But, in his remarks, he acknowledged that details remained unresolved, including whether the US would be willing to shoot down incoming missiles over Ukraine if Russia were to violate the peace.
“This hasn’t been fixed ​yet,” Zelensky said. “We have raised ​it, and we will continue to raise these questions...We need all of this to be written out.”