South Africa says a declaration was adopted at the start of the G20 summit despite US opposition

Leaders attend a plenary session on the opening day of the G20 Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa on Nov. 22, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 22 November 2025
Follow

South Africa says a declaration was adopted at the start of the G20 summit despite US opposition

  • World leaders from the Group of 20 break with tradition and adopt a declaration at the start of their summit in South Africa
  • The United States is boycotting the two-day talks in a diplomatic rift with the host country

JOHANNESBURG: World leaders from the Group of 20 rich and developing economies broke with tradition and adopted a declaration at the start of their summit in South Africa on Saturday despite opposition from the United States, which is boycotting the two-day talks in a diplomatic rift with the host country.

Vincent Magwenya, the spokesperson for South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, said a leaders’ declaration was adopted unanimously by the other members at the start of the talks in Johannesburg.

“Normally the adoption of the declaration happens right at the end. But ... there was a sense that we should actually move to have the summit declaration adopted first as the first order of the day,” Magwenya told reporters.

There were no details of what was in the declaration, but South Africa promoted it as a victory for the first G20 summit to be held in Africa that has been overshadowed by the US boycott ordered by President Donald Trump.

The Trump administration had put pressure on South Africa not to adopt a leaders’ declaration in the absence of an American delegation, South African officials said.

Comments that shouldn’t have been broadcast

South Africa’s summit has an ambitious agenda to make progress on solving some of the long-standing problems that have afflicted the world’s poorest nations. Leaders and top government officials came together at an exhibition center near the famous Soweto township in South Africa, once home to Nelson Mandela.

Many of South Africa’s priorities, especially a focus on climate change and confronting global inequality, have met resistance from the US But as he opened the summit, Ramaphosa said that “consensus has emerged” in the US’s absence.

Then, in comments to leaders that were apparently mistakenly broadcast during what was meant to be the start of closed-door discussions, Ramaphosa could be heard saying: “There’s been overwhelming consensus and agreement that one of the other tasks we should undertake right at the beginning ... which is by overwhelming consensus to adopt our declaration now.”

South Africa’s foreign minister walked over and whispered in Ramaphosa’s ear, and the South African leader said: “OK. I’m told that the cameras are still on. They should be off.”

South Africa’s agenda

South Africa, which gets to set the agenda as the country holding the rotating G20 presidency, wants leaders to agree to more help for poor countries to recover from climate-related disasters, reduce their foreign debt burdens, transition to green energy sources and harness their own critical mineral wealth — all in an attempt to counter widening global inequality.

“We’ll see,” United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said on whether the G20 could prioritize developing world countries and make meaningful reforms. “But I think South Africa has done its part in putting those things clearly upon the table.”

The two-day summit will take place without the world’s biggest economy after Trump boycotted over his claims that South Africa is pursuing racist anti-white policies and persecuting its Afrikaner white minority. The Trump administration has also made clear its opposition to South Africa’s G20 agenda from the start of the year.

Moving on from US boycott

The monthslong diplomatic rift between the US and South Africa deepened in the buildup to the summit this weekend, but while Trump’s boycott threatened to undercut the agenda, some of the leaders were eager to move on.

“I do regret it,” French President Emmanuel Macron said of Trump’s absence, “but it should not block us. Our duty is to be present, engage and work all together because we have so many challenges.”

The G20 is actually a group of 21 members that comprises 19 nations, the European Union and the African Union.

The bloc was formed in 1999 as a bridge between rich and poor nations to confront global financial crises. While it often operates in the shadow of the Group of Seven richest democracies, G20 members together represent around 85 percent of the world’s economy, 75 percent of international trade and more than half the global population.

But it works on consensus rather than any binding resolutions, and that is often hard to come by with the different interests of members like the US, Russia, China, India, Japan, the Western European nations France, Germany and the UK, and others like Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and South Africa.

Doubts over a declaration

G20 summits traditionally end with a leaders’ declaration, which details any broad agreement reached by the members. South Africa said the US was exerting pressure on it to tone down the final document to a unilateral statement from the host country.

Ramaphosa responded to that earlier this week by saying “we will not be bullied.”

Even so, the direction of the G20 bloc is likely to change sharply given that the US takes over the rotating presidency from South Africa at the end of this summit.

The only role the US will play at this summit, the White House said, will be when a representative from the United States Embassy in South Africa attends the formal handover ceremony.

South Africa said it’s an insult for Ramaphosa to hand over to a junior diplomatic official.

“We have communicated to the American government that the president will not be handing over to a junior official of the embassy,” South African Foreign Ministry spokesperson Chrispin Phiri said, adding he didn’t expect there would be a handover ceremony on Sunday.


German parliament vote on pensions tests Merz’s authority

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

German parliament vote on pensions tests Merz’s authority

BERLIN: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s ability to control his unruly coalition faces a test on Friday when parliament votes on a pensions bill that stirred a revolt by younger members of his own conservative party.
Fears the revolt could lead to the bill’s defeat, endangering the survival of the coalition, appear to have eased after the opposition Left party said it would abstain. But the dispute has revived doubts about Merz’s ability to manage his party, potentially leaving him dependent on the opposition to get the package through parliament.
His broad coalition of conservatives and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) has a slender majority of 12 votes in parliament — enough theoretically to pass the legislation, which maintains current pension levels.
But the conservatives’ youth faction, which has 18 votes, says the measure perpetuates a financially unsustainable system, leaving younger generations to foot the bill. Those legislators have left it unclear which way they will vote.
The Left Party said on Wednesday it would abstain from the vote to ensure the legislation passed in order to protect pensioners from what it called “power games.” Their abstention means the measure needs fewer votes to pass.
Political analysts say infighting over the package has heightened doubt about the coalition’s ability to push through key legislation following a series of blunders this year.
But if Merz has to also rely on the opposition to pass the bill, it would feed doubts about the mammoth tasks of reforming Germany’s ailing economy, Europe’s largest, and rebuilding its long-neglected military.
“Even if the coalition wins the vote, they will hardly gain stability, because the path to forming this majority was very shaky,” said political scientist Johannes Hillje.
“If they don’t have their own majority, then we would have a coalition crisis — as a government is defined by whether it can produce its own majorities.”
Such an outcome could further boost support for the far-right Alternative for Germany, which has surged to first place in nationwide polls in recent months and is on track to make strong gains in five state elections next year.

MERZ DISAPPOINTS HIGH EXPECTATIONS
During the election campaign, Merz, who had never previously held government office, railed against the infighting within the coalition of his SPD predecessor Olaf Scholz.
Expectations were high after he secured a historic agreement for record spending on infrastructure and defense before even taking office, and made clear he intended to return Germany to the international stage as a major player.
But his own coalition has proven shaky since he took office on day one, when he became the first chancellor ever to require a second round of votes to secure formal approval of parliament.
In the summer, Merz also failed to marshal his conservatives behind the SPD’s agreed candidate for the constitutional court, dooming the vote.
“The government’s public image as ineffective, divided and poorly managed is becoming increasingly entrenched,” said Jan Techau at consulting firm Eurasia Group.
Hillje said these slip-ups demonstrated a “failure of political craftsmanship” by both Merz and the conservatives’ parliamentary leader Jens Spahn, who could have negotiated better with dissenters within their own parliamentary group.
Merz has won plaudits abroad for his strong engagement for Ukraine, but at home his popularity has sunk to around 25 percent, making him one of the least popular chancellors in memory.
Meanwhile combined support for the conservatives and SPD is down to 39 percent from 44.9 percent in February’s election, according to the latest poll by Forsa. The AfD, which surged into pole position in August, remains in the lead on 26 percent.