EU bows to pressure on loosening AI, privacy rules

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen delivers her speech during a debate on the new 2028-2034 Multi-annual Financial Framework at the European Parliament in Brussels, Belgium. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 15 November 2025
Follow

EU bows to pressure on loosening AI, privacy rules

  • Brussels denies that pressure from the US administration influenced its push to “simplify” the bloc’s digital rules, which have drawn the wrath of President Donald Trump and American tech giants

BRUSSELS: The European Union is set next week to kickstart a rollback of landmark rules on artificial intelligence and data protection that face powerful pushback on both sides of the Atlantic.
Part of a bid to slash red tape for European businesses struggling against US and Chinese rivals, the move is drawing accusations that Brussels is putting competitiveness ahead of citizens’ privacy and protection.
Brussels denies that pressure from the US administration influenced its push to “simplify” the bloc’s digital rules, which have drawn the wrath of President Donald Trump and American tech giants.
But the European Commission says it has heard the concerns of EU firms and wants to make it easier for them to access users’ data for AI development — a move critics attack as a threat to privacy.
One planned change could unite many Europeans in relief however: the EU wants to get rid of those pesky cookie banners seeking users’ consent for tracking on websites.
According to EU officials and draft documents seen by AFP, which could change before the November 19 announcement, the European Commission will propose:
-- a one-year pause in the implementation of parts of its AI law
-- overhauling its flagship data protection rules, which privacy defenders say will make it easier for US Big Tech to “suck up Europeans’ personal data.”
The bloc’s cornerstone General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) enshrined users’ privacy from 2018 and influenced standards around the world.
The EU says it is only proposing technical changes to streamline the rules, but rights activists and EU lawmakers paint a different picture.

- ‘Biggest rollback’ -

The EU executive proposes to narrow the definition of personal data, and allow companies to process such data to train AI models “for purposes of a legitimate interest,” a draft document shows.
Reaction to the leaks has been swift — and strong.
“Unless the European Commission changes course, this would be the biggest rollback of digital fundamental rights in EU history,” 127 groups, including civil society organizations and trade unions, wrote in a letter on Thursday.
Online privacy activist Max Schrems warned the proposals “would be a massive downgrading of Europeans’ privacy” if they stay the same.
An EU official told AFP that Brussels is also expected to propose a one-year delay on implementing many provisions on high-risk AI, for example, models that can pose dangers to safety, health or citizens’ fundamental rights.
Instead of taking effect next year, they would apply from 2027.
This move comes after heavy pressure from European businesses and US Big Tech.
Dozens of Europe’s biggest companies, including France’s Airbus and Germany’s Lufthansa and Mercedes-Benz, called for a pause in July on the AI law which they warn risks stifling innovation.

- More battles ahead -

Commission president Ursula von der Leyen faces a battle ahead as the changes will need the approval of both the EU parliament and member states.
Her conservative camp’s main coalition allies have raised the alarm, with the socialists saying they oppose any delay to the AI law, and the centrists warning they would stand firm against any changes that undermine privacy.
Noyb, a campaign group founded by Schrems, published a scathing takedown of the EU’s plans for the GDPR and what they entail.
The EU has pushed back against claims that Brussels will reduce privacy.
“I can confirm 100 percent that the objective... is not to lower the high privacy standards we have for our citizens,” EU spokesman for digital affairs, Thomas Regnier, said.
But there are fears that more changes to digital rules are on the way.

- Simplification, not deregulation -

The proposals are part of the EU executive’s so-called simplification packages to remove what they describe as administrative burdens.
Brussels rejects any influence from Trump — despite sustained pressure since the first weeks of the new US administration, when Vice President JD Vance railed against the “excessive regulation” of AI.
This “started before the mandate of the president of the US,” chief commission spokeswoman Paula Pinho said this week.
Calls for changes to AI and data rules have been growing louder in Europe.
A major report last year by Italian ex-premier Mario Draghi also warned that data rules could hamper European businesses’ AI innovation.


Ukraine’s Zelensky: We have backed US peace proposals to get a deal done

Updated 13 February 2026
Follow

Ukraine’s Zelensky: We have backed US peace proposals to get a deal done

  • “The tactic we chose is for the Americans not to think that we want to continue the war,” Zelensky ‌told The Atlantic

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Kyiv ‌had sought to back US peace proposals to end the war with Russia as President Donald Trump seeks to resolve the conflict before ​November mid-term elections.
Zelensky, in an interview published by The Atlantic on Thursday, said Kyiv was willing to hold both a presidential election and a referendum on a deal, but would not settle for an accord that was detrimental to Ukraine’s interests.
“The tactic we chose is for the Americans not to think that we want to continue the war,” Zelensky ‌told the ‌US-based publication. “That’s why we started supporting their ​proposals in ‌any ⁠format ​that speeds ⁠things along.”
He said Ukraine was “not afraid of anything. Are we ready for elections? We’re ready. Are we ready for a referendum? We’re ready.”
Zelensky has sought to build good relations with Washington since an Oval Office meeting in February 2025 descended into a shouting match with Trump and US Vice President JD ⁠Vance.
But he said he had rejected a ‌proposal, reported this week by the ‌Financial Times, to announce the votes ​on February 24, the fourth ‌anniversary of Russia’s invasion. A ceasefire and proposed US security ‌guarantees against a future invasion had not yet been settled, he said.
“No one is clinging to power,” The Atlantic quoted him as saying. “I am ready for elections. But for that we need security, guarantees ‌of security, a ceasefire.”
And he added: “I don’t think we should put a bad deal ⁠up for a ⁠referendum.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Zelensky is not a legitimate negotiating partner because he has not faced election since coming to power in 2019.
Zelensky has said in recent weeks that a document on security guarantees for Ukraine is all but ready to be signed.
But, in his remarks, he acknowledged that details remained unresolved, including whether the US would be willing to shoot down incoming missiles over Ukraine if Russia were to violate the peace.
“This hasn’t been fixed ​yet,” Zelensky said. “We have raised ​it, and we will continue to raise these questions...We need all of this to be written out.”