European military trainers should be part of Ukraine security guarantees, EU general says

A man and wounded Ukrainian serviceman hug one another at a makeshift memorial for fallen Ukrainian and foreign soldiers, on Independence Square in Kyiv, Ukraine. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 07 November 2025
Follow

European military trainers should be part of Ukraine security guarantees, EU general says

  • With the war in Ukraine showing no sign of ending, Western officials have been developing post-war plans to bolster Kyiv’s forces and deter Russia from attacking its neighbor again

BRUSSELS: The European Union should move military trainers into Ukraine after the war there ends to strengthen Ukrainian forces as part of Western security guarantees, the EU’s top military adviser told Reuters.
General Sean Clancy, chair of the EU’s military committee, said the United States would remain important for Europe’s security even as the EU gears up to be ready to defend itself by 2030.
NATO will continue to provide “hard power” to defend Europe but the transatlantic relationship will be rebalanced with Europeans becoming more self-reliant, said Clancy, who is Irish.

HAVING EU TRAINERS IN UKRAINE AFTER WAR IS ‘OPTIMAL’
The EU’s defense push has been driven by Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine and US President Donald Trump’s demands for Europeans to take more responsibility for their own security.
With the war in Ukraine showing no sign of ending, Western officials have been developing post-war plans to bolster Kyiv’s forces and deter Russia from attacking its neighbor again.
Clancy said it would be “optimal” to move part of the EU Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM Ukraine) into the country after the war. The mission has already trained more than 80,000 soldiers outside Ukraine.
Clancy said strong Ukrainian forces would serve as a security guarantee for both Ukraine and Europe.
“Europe can provide a high degree of that level of training. Will some of that be in Ukraine? I think that is optimal,” he said.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said in September there was broad support from EU countries to take such a step, but no decision has been made yet. It would likely depend on the terms of any ceasefire or peace deal, diplomats say, and would need the backing of all 27 EU member states.

SIZE OF MISSION WOULD DEPEND ON REQUIREMENTS
Clancy said the size of any EU presence inside Ukraine would depend on what Kyiv wanted and the type of training required.
“This is something that we are...prudently examining in concert with our colleagues in Ukraine. And their needs are changing as well,” he said.
As chair of the EU military committee, Clancy serves as the voice of the military chiefs of the bloc’s member countries in discussions on defense and security policy.
That has included providing advice for the European Commission’s “Defense Readiness Roadmap,” which aims to prepare Europe to “credibly deter its adversaries and respond to any aggression” by 2030.
But Clancy said the US-European security relationship would remain important, not least because Europeans would still be using US weapons systems, even while striving to expand their own defense industries.
“For Patriot missiles, for F-35s (fighter jets) — all of the equipment and the high-end equipment that we already have sourced in the United States has a lifetime of decades to come,” he said.


US judge rejects Trump administration’s halt of wind energy permits

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

US judge rejects Trump administration’s halt of wind energy permits

  • 17 Democratic-led states challenged the suspension
  • Offshore wind group supports ruling for economic and energy priorities
BOSTON: A federal judge on Monday struck down an order by US President Donald Trump’s administration to halt all federal approvals for new wind energy projects, saying that agencies’ efforts to implement his directive were unlawful and arbitrary.
Agencies including the US Departments of the Interior and Commerce and the Environmental Protection Agency have been implementing a directive to halt all new approvals needed for both onshore and offshore wind projects pending a review of leasing and permitting practices.
Siding with a group of 17 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia, US District Judge Patti Saris in Boston said those agencies had failed to provide reasoned explanations for the actions they took to carry out the directive Trump issued on his first day back in office on January 20.
They could not lawfully under the Administrative Procedure Act indefinitely decline to review applications for permits, added Saris, who was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat whose state led the legal challenge, called the ruling “a big victory in our fight to keep tackling the climate crisis” in a social media post.
White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said in a statement that Trump through his order had “unleashed America’s energy dominance to protect our economic and national security.”
Trump has sought to boost government support for fossil fuels and maximize output in the United States, the world’s top oil and gas producer, after campaigning for the presidency on the refrain of “drill, baby, drill.”
The states, led by New York, sued in May, after the Interior Department ordered Norway’s Equinor to halt construction on its Empire Wind offshore wind project off the coast of New York.
While the administration allowed work on Empire Wind to resume, the states say the broader pause on permitting and leasing continues to have harmful economic effects.
The states said the agencies implementing Trump’s order never said why they were abruptly changing longstanding policy supporting wind energy development.
Saris agreed, saying the policy “constitutes a change of course from decades of agencies issuing (or denying) permits related to wind energy projects.”
The defendants “candidly concede that the sole factor they considered in deciding to stop issuing permits was the President’s direction to do so,” Saris wrote.
An offshore wind energy trade group welcomed the ruling.
“Overturning the unlawful blanket halt to offshore wind permitting activities is needed to achieve our nation’s energy and economic priorities of bringing more power online quickly, improving grid reliability, and driving billions of new American steel manufacturing and shipbuilding investments,” Oceantic Network CEO Liz Burdock said in a statement.