BBC’s Middle East online editor sues Owen Jones over Gaza bias allegations

Raffi Berg, the BBC’s Middle East online editor, has launched legal action against British journalist Owen Jones over an article that alleged institutional bias in the broadcaster’s coverage of the conflict in Gaza. (Reuters/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 06 November 2025
Follow

BBC’s Middle East online editor sues Owen Jones over Gaza bias allegations

  • Raffi Berg files High Court libel claim against journalist following article alleging pro-Israel bias in BBC’s coverage

LONDON: Raffi Berg, the BBC’s Middle East online editor, has launched legal action against British journalist Owen Jones over an article that alleged institutional bias in the broadcaster’s coverage of the conflict in Gaza, it was revealed on Thursday.

Court documents filed at the High Court show Berg is suing Jones for libel over the piece— The BBC’s Civil War Over Gaza — published on the Drop Site website in December last year.

The article cited claims from 13 BBC employees who, speaking anonymously, accused Berg of “playing a key role in a wider BBC culture of systematic Israeli propaganda.”

It further alleged that he reshaped headlines and story text to “foreground the Israeli military perspective while stripping away Palestinian humanity.”

Berg, who has worked at the BBC since 2001 and served as Middle East editor for its news website for 12 years, strongly denies the accusations.

In court filings seen by the UK’s Press Association, Berg’s barrister, John Stables, said the allegations “strike at the claimant’s professional reputation as a journalist and editor,” and have led to “an onslaught of hatred, intimidation and threats,” including death threats directed at Berg following the article’s publication.

Stables added that the BBC had introduced additional workplace security measures for Berg, and that police were investigating the threats.

“The claimant’s reputation has been seriously damaged and he has been caused substantial fear, anxiety, humiliation, upset and distress,” Stables said, adding that the impact had been “greatly exacerbated” by Jones’ refusal to apologize or remove the article.

Berg is seeking damages, an injunction preventing the article’s republication, and a court order requiring that it be removed from all websites.

In response, Jones said he “strongly disagreed” with Berg’s claims and looked forward to “vigorously defending” his reporting in court if necessary.

The article claimed the BBC faced an “internal revolt” over its reporting on Gaza, alleging that concerns from staff about editorial balance had been “repeatedly brushed aside.”

It also asserted that “facts unfavorable to Israel have been stripped out of Berg’s reports.”

Following its publication, an online petition called for the BBC to suspend Berg, and protesters reportedly targeted the corporation’s offices in January.

Separately, a leaked internal memo seen by British media this week alleged that the BBC’s Arabic news service had sought to “minimize Israeli suffering” in its coverage of the conflict in Gaza in order to portray Israel as the aggressor.

The 19-page whistleblowing document said the Arabic service, partly funded by the UK’s Foreign Office, gave extensive coverage to Hamas statements and maintained an editorial tone “considerably different” from that of the main BBC website, despite supposed alignment on editorial standards.


BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

Updated 16 December 2025
Follow

BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

LONDON: The BBC said Tuesday it would fight a $10-billion lawsuit brought by US President Donald Trump against the British broadcaster over a documentary that edited his 2021 speech ahead of the US Capitol riot.
“As we have made clear previously, we will be defending this case,” a BBC spokesperson said in a statement sent to AFP, adding the company would not be making “further comment on ongoing legal proceedings.”
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Miami, seeks “damages in an amount not less than $5,000,000,000” for each of two counts against the British broadcaster, for alleged defamation and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
The video that triggered the lawsuit spliced together two separate sections of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021 in a way that made it appear he explicitly urged supporters to attack the Capitol, where lawmakers were certifying Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.
The lawsuit comes as the UK government on Tuesday launched the politically sensitive review of the BBC’s Royal Charter, which outlines the corporation’s funding and governance and needs to be renewed in 2027.
As part of the review, it launched a public consultation on issues including the role of “accuracy” in the BBC’s mission and contentious reforms to the corporation’s funding model, which currently relies on a mandatory fee for anyone in the country who watches television.
Minister Stephen Kinnock stressed after the lawsuit was filed that the UK government “is a massive supporter of the BBC.”
The BBC has “been very clear that there is no case to answer in terms of Mr.Trump’s accusation on the broader point of libel or defamation. I think it’s right the BBC stands firm on that point,” Kinnock told Sky News on Tuesday.
Trump, 79, had said the lawsuit was imminent, claiming the BBC had “put words in my mouth,” even positing that “they used AI or something.”
The documentary at issue aired last year before the 2024 election, on the BBC’s “Panorama” flagship current affairs program.

Apology letter 

“The formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election,” a spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said in a statement to AFP.
“The BBC has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda,” the statement added.
The British Broadcasting Corporation, whose audience extends well beyond the United Kingdom, faced a period of turmoil last month after a media report brought renewed attention to the edited clip.
The scandal led the BBC director general, Tim Davie, and the organization’s top news executive, Deborah Turness, to resign.
Trump’s lawsuit says the edited speech in the documentary was “fabricated and aired by the Defendants one week before the 2024 Presidential Election in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election’s outcome to President Trump’s detriment.”
The BBC has denied Trump’s claims of legal defamation, though BBC chairman Samir Shah has sent Trump a letter of apology.
Shah also told a UK parliamentary committee last month the broadcaster should have acted sooner to acknowledge its mistake after the error was disclosed in a memo, which was leaked to The Daily Telegraph newspaper.
The BBC lawsuit is the latest in a string of legal actions Trump has taken against media companies in recent years, several of which have led to multi-million-dollar settlements.