UK ends Gaza surveillance flights after 2-year mission to locate hostages held by Hamas

Britain's Defence Secretary John Healey arrives to attend the meeting of the Ukraine Defence Contact Group, part of the meeting of NATO Ministers of Defence Summit at the NATO headquarters in Brussels on October 15, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 16 October 2025
Follow

UK ends Gaza surveillance flights after 2-year mission to locate hostages held by Hamas

  • ‘Professionalism’ of British personnel praised 

LONDON: The UK has ended its surveillance flights over Gaza after nearly two years, following the release of hostages held by Hamas as part of the recent ceasefire deal, Defense Secretary John Healey had confirmed.

Healey praised the “professionalism” of British personnel who had conducted the unarmed missions, which began in December 2023 with the stated goal of helping locate hostages taken during the Oct. 7 attacks of that year.

The final flight took place last week, shortly before the ceasefire came into effect, The Times newspaper reported.

“This ceasefire is a moment of profound relief, for the civilian population of Gaza, and for the Israeli hostages and their families, who have all endured unimaginable suffering,” Healey said.

“I am proud of the UK’s efforts to support the safe return of the hostages, and the professionalism of our service personnel involved.”

The UK’s Ministry of Defense said the aircraft were “always unarmed, did not have a combat role, and were tasked solely to locate hostages.”

Intelligence passed to Israel, officials said, was strictly limited to hostage rescue operations.

However, the program proved controversial throughout its duration.

The UK government confirmed earlier this year that operations were carried out either by the Royal Air Force or by US contractors it hired, a revelation that raised concerns within the MoD itself.

A technical error last July exposed one such US aircraft, registered in Nevada, flying above Khan Younis.

The program drew criticism from rights groups and opposition politicians, who questioned whether intelligence gathered by the UK could have been used by Israel in its military operations in Gaza.

The Guardian newspaper reported concerns in August among legal experts and analysts that Britain had “no operational control” over how information passed to Israel might be used once shared.

Helen Maguire, the Liberal Democrats’ defense spokesperson, said at the time that while she supported efforts to find hostages, “the government must outline what steps it has taken to ensure Israel can’t use UK-sourced intelligence for its military operations in Gaza.”

Labour backbencher Kim Johnson also voiced alarm, saying it was “deeply concerning that surveillance flights over Gaza continue relentlessly, even as serious questions remain about their purpose and oversight.”

Former Foreign Secretary David Lammy also told reporters at the time: “It would be quite wrong for the British government to assist in the prosecution of this war in Gaza. We are not doing that, (we) would never do that.”

The MoD repeatedly insisted that strict controls governed the intelligence-sharing process and that no information of “military utility” was passed to Israeli authorities.


Climate activist group files second lawsuit against Sweden

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Climate activist group files second lawsuit against Sweden

  • Sweden’s Supreme Court in February 2025 ruled that the complaint filed against the state was inadmissible
  • “We still have a chance to get out of the planetary crises and build a safe and fair world,” Edling said

STOCKHOLM: A group of climate activists said Friday they were filing another lawsuit against the Swedish state for alleged climate inaction, after the Supreme Court threw out their case last year.
The group behind the lawsuit, Aurora, first tried to sue the Swedish state in late 2022.
Sweden’s Supreme Court in February 2025 ruled that the complaint filed against the state — brought by an individual, with 300 other people joining it as a class action lawsuit — was inadmissible.
The court at the time noted the “very high requirements for individuals to have the right to bring such a claim” against a state.
“We still have a chance to get out of the planetary crises and build a safe and fair world. But this requires that rich countries that emit as much as Sweden stop breaking the law,” Aurora spokesperson Ida Edling said in a statement Friday.
The group, which said the lawsuit had been filed with the Stockholm District Court Friday, said it believes the Swedish state is obligated “to reduce Sweden’s emissions as much and as quickly as necessary in order for the country to be in line with its fair share.”
“This means that emissions from several sectors must reach zero before 2030,” the group said, while noting this was 15 years before Sweden’s currently set targets.
The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency as well as the OECD warned last year that Sweden was at risk of not reaching its own goal of net zero emissions by 2045.
While the first lawsuit was unsuccessful, the group noted that international courts had made several landmark decisions since the first suit was filed, spotlighting two in particular.
In an April 2024 decision, Europe’s top rights court, the European Court of Human Rights, ruled that Switzerland was not doing enough to tackle climate change, the first country ever to be condemned by an international tribunal for not taking sufficient action to curb global warming.
In 2025, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion stating that countries violating their climate obligations were committing an “unlawful” act.