LONDON: Ukraine is intensifying strikes on Russian refineries and oil infrastructure, with more than 30 attacks since early August, aimed at weakening Moscow’s ability to finance war against its neighbor.
Current consequence?
Russia is the world’s third-largest producer and second-biggest exporter of crude oil. Oil and gas revenues represented about 30 percent of its budget in 2024, or largest source of state funds according to the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
Kyiv’s attacks have so far been “quite effective,” with Russian refinery production rates having “dropped around 10 percent,” Homayoun Falakshahi, analyst at energy research group Kpler, told AFP.
Faced with a risk of shortages, Moscow recently restricted exports of petroleum products until the end of the year and extended a ban on gasoline exports.
Rystad Energy analyst Janiv Shah said that Russia’s refinery production dropped to an average of 4.9 million barrels per day by mid-September, down about 400,000 bpd compared to the first half of 2025.
The scarcity of Russian refined products has significantly widened the gap between the price of a barrel of Russian crude oil and that of refined products.
The impact on pump prices is already being felt. As of September 1, retail gasoline cost 6.7 percent more compared to the end of 2024, according to Russia’s official statistics agency Rosstat.
This despite a sharp drop in the price of a barrel of crude oil over the same period.
Long-term impact?
Russia’s situation risks worsening because damaged infrastructure typically takes an “extended time” to return to normal operations, Shah explained.
This at a time when revenue from Russian crude oil is primarily affected by falling global prices as markets expect abundant supplies in the coming months.
SEB bank analyst Bjarne Schieldrop believes the “situation will likely become worse... as Ukraine becomes better at attacking Russian refineries,” forecasting an end to exports of all Russian oil products as well as the introduction of domestic rationing.
The US envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, has floated the possibility of long-range strikes by Ukraine against Russia using American weapons.
In trying to export some of the oil intended for its refineries Russia has come up against difficult logistical problems, while the number of countries willing to import more of its crude is limited.
Strikes versus sanctions?
So far, international sanctions aimed at weakening Moscow “are not working,” according to Adi Imsirovic, director of the Surrey Clean Energy consultancy.
Delayed implementation of certain sanctions gave Russia’s President Vladimir Putin time “to build a parallel trading system,” he said.
Washington’s doubling of tariffs on many of India’s products has failed to curb the country’s purchase of Russian crude.
On the other hand, with the withdrawal of Western oil companies from Russia, investment in the nation’s energy infrastructure has declined considerably, limiting its ability to increase crude output over the coming years.
Russia, which produces “around 9.25 million barrels per day,” according to Falakshahi, has a “maximum production capacity of 9.45 mbpd” compared to around 10 mbpd before the war.
Ukraine strikes put pressure on Russian oil
https://arab.news/znjgb
Ukraine strikes put pressure on Russian oil
- Russia is the world’s third-largest producer and second-biggest exporter of crude oil
- Oil and gas revenues represented about 30 percent of its budget in 2024
Blair dropped from Gaza ‘peace board’ after Arab objections
- Former UK PM was viewed with hostility over role in Iraq War
- He reportedly met Netanyahu late last month to discuss plans
LONDON: Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair has been withdrawn from the US-led Gaza “peace council” following objections by Arab and Muslim countries, The Guardian reported.
US President Donald Trump has said he would chair the council. Blair was long floated for a prominent role in the administration, but has now been quietly dropped, according to the Financial Times.
Blair had been lobbying for a position in the postwar council and oversaw a plan for Gaza from his Tony Blair Institute for Global Change that involved Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law.
Supporters of the former British leader cited his role in the Good Friday Agreement, which ended decades of conflict and violence in Northern Ireland.
His detractors, however, highlighted his former position as representative of the Middle East Quartet, made up of the UN, EU, Russia and US, which aimed to bring about peace in the Middle East.
Furthermore, Blair’s involvement in the Iraq War is viewed with hostility across the Arab world.
After Trump revealed his 20-point plan to end the Israel-Hamas war in September, Blair was the only figure publicly named as taking a potential role in the postwar peace council.
The US president supported his appointment and labeled him a “very good man.”
A source told the Financial Times that Blair’s involvement was backed by the US and Israel.
“The Americans like him and the Israelis like him,” the person said.
The US plan for Gaza was criticized in some quarters for proposing a separate Gaza framework that did not include the West Bank, stoking fears that the occupied Palestinian territories would become separate polities indefinitely.
Trump said in October: “I’ve always liked Tony, but I want to find out that he’s an acceptable choice to everybody.”
Blair is reported to have held an unpublicized meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu late last month to discuss plans.
His office declined to comment to The Guardian, but an ally said the former prime minister would not be sitting on Gaza’s “board of peace.”










