Rights groups, activists urge Microsoft to cut all military ties with Israel after partial service suspension

Microsoft workers occupy HQ in protest against company’s ties to Israeli military. (File/No Azure for Apartheid group)
Short Url
Updated 27 September 2025
Follow

Rights groups, activists urge Microsoft to cut all military ties with Israel after partial service suspension

  • Tech giant halts Israeli access to some technologies linked to mass surveillance of Palestinians
  • Campaign group steps up protests against Microsoft, demanding a ‘digital arms embargo’

LONDON: Human rights groups and activists welcomed Microsoft’s suspension of Israeli military access to some technologies linked to mass surveillance of Palestinians, urging the company to go further and end all contracts with Israel.

The decision, announced by Microsoft President Brad Smith on Thursday, followed an investigation by The Guardian, +972 Magazine, and Local Call, which revealed that Unit 8200, Israel’s spy agency, used Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform to store and process vast amounts of Palestinian phone calls in Gaza and the West Bank as part of a mass surveillance program.

Microsoft said it acted after reviewing the reports and had blocked the unit’s access to some cloud storage and AI services.

Agnes Callamard, secretary-general of Amnesty International, urged the tech giant to investigate all its other dealings with the Israeli military to ensure they do not contribute to Israel’s “human rights violations against Palestinians.”

She urged other tech companies to suspend similar technology and military sales and called for accountability as Israel’s campaign in Gaza continues to cause mass civilian casualties, displacement and famine.

“There must be an end to the impunity that Israel has enjoyed and flouted,” said Callamard, urging states to “live up to their legal obligations toward bringing Israel’s genocide.”

The worker-led “No Azure for Apartheid” campaign group, which has lately escalated protests against Microsoft for its ties with Israel, welcomed the partial suspension but said it was “insufficient.”

The group reiterated its call for a complete suspension of Microsoft’s ties with the Israeli military and vowed to continue protests until that demand is met.

“We know that this is not enough,” Hossam Nasr, one of the group’s organizers, told Arab News.

“Microsoft has only disabled a small subset of services to only one unit in the Israeli military. The vast majority of Microsoft’s contract with the Israeli military remains intact.”

He said continuing ties with the military while it carries out its relentless campaign in Gaza is “unconscionable and morally indefensible for Microsoft.”

Nasr, a former Microsoft employee who was fired last year for holding an “unauthorized” vigil for Palestinian victims of Gaza, was one of seven protesters arrested after staging a a sit-in at the office of the Microsoft president in Washington. He said Microsoft’s suspension of some cloud services to Unit 8200, one month after the sit-in and repeated protests, demonstrated that the company had yielded to pressure.

Nasr said that although Microsoft’s response was “inadequate,” it marked the first instance of a US technology company halting the sale of certain services to the Israeli military “since the start of Gaza genocide.”

The campaign group, which gathered over 2,000 signatures from Microsoft employees and held demonstrations outside the company’s Washington headquarters last month, described its demand as part of a broader push for a “digital arms embargo” in parallel with weapons embargoes being imposed by governments worldwide.

In his official statement on Thursday, Smith said investigations were continuing.

Despite the suspension, he said that the company will continue to provide cybersecurity support to Israel and regional partners under existing agreements.


Study finds nearly half of UK news stories on Muslims show signs of bias

Updated 09 March 2026
Follow

Study finds nearly half of UK news stories on Muslims show signs of bias

  • Centre for Media Monitoring finds 20,000 out of 40,913 articles from 30 major news outlets contain bias and 70% link Muslims to negative behaviors or themes
  • Findings reveal ‘deeply concerning evidence of structural bias’ in portrayal of Muslims by UK press and point to ‘systemic problem’ within the media, says center’s director

LONDON: Nearly half of news articles published in the UK in 2025 that referenced Muslims or Islam contained some degree of bias, according to a report issued on Monday by the Centre for Media Monitoring. It also found that about 70 percent of stories linked Muslims to negative behaviors or themes.

The nonprofit organization, which tracks the ways in which Muslims and Islam are portrayed in the media, examined 40,913 articles from 30 major news outlets and found that about 20,000 showed some form of bias.

The study looked at “structural patterns” in coverage that “shape public narratives” about Muslims amid rising hostility toward the community.

“As the largest study of its kind ever conducted in the UK, this report presents deeply concerning evidence of structural bias in how Muslims are portrayed in the UK press,” said Rizwana Hamid, the director of the organization.

It found that 70 percent of the articles it reviewed highlighted negative aspects related to Muslims, though not all of the stories were biased in themselves. The wider patterns were also troubling: 44 percent of the coverage omitted key context, 17 percent relied on generalizations, and 13 percent included outright misrepresentation.

Taken together, the monitoring center said, the findings amounted to evidence of an “information integrity crisis” that distorts public understanding, and “a deeply concerning trend” in reporting on Muslims.

The research points to a “systemic problem within our media ecosystem,” Hamid said.

“When entire communities are repeatedly framed through lenses of suspicion or threat, it inevitably shapes public attitudes, political debate and the everyday lives of British Muslims,” she added.

News brands targeting right-wing audiences were more likely to produce biased coverage, the report found.

The Spectator magazine and GB News were identified as having the highest proportion of “very biased” articles, and as the “worst across all five bias categories”: negative framing, generalizations, misrepresentation, lack of context, and problematic headlines.

Other outlets highlighted for displaying high levels of biased content about Muslims included The Telegraph, The Jewish Chronicle, Daily Express, The Sun, Daily Mail and The Times.

In contrast, the BBC, other broadcasters and left-leaning outlets recorded the lowest rates of bias in the study.

The research comes as British Muslims report rising levels of discrimination. Official figures published in October revealed that religious hate crimes against Muslims rose by 19 percent in the year to March 2025 compared with the previous 12 months.