British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police

Protesters hold placards and wave Palestinian flags as they take part in a Pro-Palestinian march in central London, on February 15, 2025, organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 August 2025
Follow

British pro-Palestine protester launches legal action against police

  • Laura Murton, 42, had held signs saying ‘Free Gaza’ and ‘Israel is committing genocide’
  • Armed police accused her of violating UK’s Terrorism Act, threatened her with arrest

LONDON: A pro-Palestine protester in the UK who was threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act is taking legal action against the police force involved in the incident, The Guardian reported on Friday.

Laura Murton, 42, had held up a Palestinian flag and signs saying “Free Gaza” and “Israel is committing genocide” at her demonstration in the city of Canterbury last month.

Armed police who responded to the protest told Murton that she had expressed support for Palestine Action, the group banned in July and listed as a terrorist organization.

Neither of Murton’s signs mentioned Palestine Action, she told officers, who asked if she supported any proscribed organizations. “I do not,” she responded.

Murton’s solicitors have issued a letter of claim to Kent police’s chief constable, in what is viewed as a reminder of police responsibilities ahead of major pro-Palestine protests this weekend across the UK.

Murton is seeking damages over the incident and will donate any compensation toward Palestinian causes.

She is also requesting an apology and an overview of details that police officers recorded about the incident.

Shamik Dutta of law firm Bhatt Murphy, which is representing Murton, said: “The legal challenge is being brought because as matters stand our client has neither received any apology nor any acknowledgment that Kent police conduct has been unlawful.

“She has had no indication that no further action will be taken against her in relation to her protest on July 14 or that no further action will be taken against her if she wishes to engage in a materially similar protest in the future.”

Murton filmed her encounter. One officer told her: “Mentioning freedom of Gaza, Israel, genocide, all of that all come under proscribed groups, which are terror groups that have been dictated by the government.” He then claimed that the phrase “free Gaza” indicated support for Palestine Action.

Murton reluctantly provided her name and address to the officers, who had threatened her with arrest unless she did so.

 


Australia demands social media giants report progress on account bans for children under 16

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Australia demands social media giants report progress on account bans for children under 16

MELBOURNE: Australian authorities on Thursday demanded some of the world’s biggest social media platforms report how many accounts they have deactivated since a ban on accounts for children younger than 16 became law.

Facebook, Instagram, Kick, Reddit, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube and Twitch all said they would abide by Australia’s world-first law that took effect on Wednesday, Communications Minister Anika Wells said.

But the tech companies’ responses to eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant’s first demand for data will likely indicate their commitment to ridding their platforms of young children.

“Today the eSafety Commissioner will write to all 10 platforms who are considered age-restricted social media platforms and she will ask them … what were your numbers of under 16 accounts on Dec. 9; what are your numbers today on Dec. 11?” Wells said.

The commissioner would reveal the platforms’ responses within two weeks. The platforms would be required to provide monthly updates for six months.

The companies face fines of up to 49.5 million Australian dollars ($32.9 million) from Wednesday if they fail to take reasonable steps to remove the accounts of Australian children younger than 16.

Wells said the European Commission, France, Denmark, Greece, Romania, Indonesia, Malaysia and New Zealand were considering following Australia’s lead in restricting children’s access to social media.

“There’s been a huge amount of global interest and we welcome it, and we welcome all of the allies who are joining Australia to take action in this space to draw a line to say enough’s enough,” Wells said.

Sydney-based rights group Digital Freedom Project plans to challenge the law on constitutional grounds in the Australian High Court early next year.

Inman Grant said some platforms had consulted lawyers and might be waiting to receive their first so-called compulsory information notice Thursday or their first fine for noncompliance before mounting a legal challenge.

Inman Grant said her staff were ready for the possibility that platforms would deliberately fail to exclude young children through age verification and age estimation technologies.

“That could be a strategy that they have in and of themselves: we’ll say we’re complying but then we’ll do a crappy job using these technologies and we’ll let people get through and have people claim it’s a failure,” Inman Grant told Australian Broadcasting Corp.

Inman Grant said her research had found that 84 percent of children in Australia aged 8-12 had accessed a social media account. Of those with social media access, 90 percent did so with the help of parents.

Inman Grant said the main reason parents helped was because “they didn’t want their children to be excluded.”

“What this legislation does … is it takes away that fear of exclusion,” Inman Grant said.