Lula tells Trump world does not want ‘emperor’ after US threatens BRICS tariff

South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa, Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 7, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 July 2025
Follow

Lula tells Trump world does not want ‘emperor’ after US threatens BRICS tariff

  • Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva: ‘We are sovereign nations. We don’t want an emperor’

RIO DE JANEIRO: Developing nations at the BRICS summit on Monday brushed away an accusation from President Donald Trump that they are “anti-American,” with Brazil’s president saying the world does not need an emperor after the US leader threatened extra tariffs on the bloc.

Trump’s threat on Sunday night came as the US government prepared to finalize dozens of trade deals with a range of countries before his July 9 deadline for the imposition of significant “retaliatory tariffs.”

The Trump administration does not intend to immediately impose an additional 10 percent tariff against BRICS nations, as threatened, but will proceed if individual countries take policies his administration deems “anti-American,” according to a source familiar with the matter.

At the end of the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, Lula was defiant when asked by journalists about Trump’s tariff threat: “The world has changed. We don’t want an emperor.”

“This is a set of countries that wants to find another way of organizing the world from the economic perspective,” he said of the bloc. “I think that’s why the BRICS are making people uncomfortable.”

In February, Trump warned the BRICS would face “100 percent tariffs” if they tried to undermine the role of the US dollar in global trade. Brazil’s BRICS presidency had already backed off efforts to advance a common currency for the group that some members proposed last year.

But Lula repeated on Monday his view that global trade needs alternatives to the US dollar.

“The world needs to find a way that our trade relations don’t have to pass through the dollar,” Lula told journalists at the end of the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro.

“Obviously, we have to be responsible about doing that carefully. Our central banks have to discuss it with central banks from other countries,” he added. “That’s something that happens gradually until it’s consolidated.”

Other BRICS members also pushed back against Trump’s threats more subtly.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa told reporters that the group does not seek to compete with any other power and expressed confidence in reaching a trade deal with the US

“Tariffs should not be used as a tool for coercion and pressuring,” Mao Ning, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson said in Beijing. The BRICS advocates for “win-win cooperation,” she added, and “does not target any country.”

A Kremlin spokesperson said Russia’s cooperation with the BRICS was based on a “common world view” and “will never be directed against third countries.”

India did not immediately provide an official response to Trump.

Many BRICS members and many of the group’s partner nations are highly dependent on trade with the United States. New member Indonesia’s senior economic minister, Airlangga Hartarto, who is in Brazil for the BRICS summit, is scheduled to go to the US on Monday to oversee tariff talks, an official told Reuters. Malaysia, which was attending as a partner country and was slapped with 24 percent tariffs that were later suspended, said that it maintains independent economic policies and is not focused on ideological alignment.

Multilateral diplomacy

With forums such as the G7 and G20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and Trump’s disruptive “America First” approach, the BRICS group has presented itself as a haven for multilateral diplomacy amid violent conflicts and trade wars.

In a joint statement released on Sunday afternoon, leaders at the summit condemned the recent bombing of member nation Iran and warned that the rise in tariffs threatened global trade, continuing its veiled criticism of Trump’s tariff policies.

Hours later, Trump warned he would punish countries seeking to join the group.

The original BRICS group gathered leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China at its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates as members.

Saudi Arabia has held off formally accepting an invitation to full membership, but is participating as a partner country. More than 30 nations have expressed interest in participating in the BRICS, either as full members or partners.


Indian farmers, unions strike against new trade deal with US

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Indian farmers, unions strike against new trade deal with US

  • India agreed to eliminate or reduce tariffs on US industrial goods, wide range of farm, food products
  • Commerce minister says farmers will not suffer ‘any harm’ as deal is ‘fair, equitable, and balanced’

NEW DELHI: Indian farmers took part in nationwide trade union protests on Thursday, saying they fear the implications of New Delhi’s new trade pact with the US, which will result in American products gaining duty-free access to the Indian market.

Agriculture provides livelihoods for more than 40 percent of India’s 1.4 billion population, and opening the sector to foreign competition has long been politically sensitive.

India signed an interim framework of the US trade deal last week, with the formal pact being expected to be finalized by March. The US cut its 50 percent duty on Indian goods to 18 percent, while India agreed to eliminate or reduce tariffs on all US industrial goods and a wide range of farm and food products.

While details of the agreement have not yet been announced, farmers fear being undercut by cheap, subsidized American products which will threaten their livelihood.

Rakesh Tikait, national spokesman for the Bharatiya Kisan Union (Indian Farmers’ Union) said the government had not held discussions with farmers before agreeing to the deal.

The BKU and other rural platforms have joined a broader strike held across India by major trade unions opposed to new labor codes — which have been criticized for weakening workers’ rights and reducing job security — as they saw common cause with other workers.

“We are protesting against the US–India trade deal, which we fear goes against the larger interests of Indian farmers. If US farm goods, fishery products, and dairy products hit the Indian market, Indian farmers cannot withstand this onslaught and would be ruined,” Tikait told Arab News from a protest site in Western Uttar Pradesh.

“We want this deal to be changed and made pro-farmer. Otherwise we will oppose it tooth and nail.”

According to Rajveer Singh Jadaun, president of the farmers’ union in Uttar Pradesh, the agriculture sector is facing an “existential threat” in a country that historically imposes tariffs of 30–150 percent on imports to protect farmers.

With tariffs reduced or eliminated and those imposed on Indian products higher than before, protesting farmers are convinced there is no level playing field.

“The deal is giving a zero percent tariff to the US’ agricultural and other products and we are charged 18 percent, which is higher than the 3 percent in the past,” Jadaun said.

“American farmers are celebrating the deal — that means there is something fishy … The government is speaking in many voices and that creates further confusion. I would like the government to clarify the stand and make everything clear.”

Prices of Indian corn and soybean have already fallen by 4 percent and 10 percent respectively, following the deal’s announcement.

P. Krishna Prasad, finance secretary of the All India Farmers’ Union, predicted that prices of other products may soon fall, too.

“They are bringing fresh and processed fruits. If apples are being brought at 75 rupees ($1) per kilo to India from America, then the apple economy of Jammu and Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh will collapse,” he said.

“In America, there are only 1.7 million farmers, but in India there are 166 million farmer households. And in America, one farmer household is getting a 60 lakh rupees ($73,000) subsidy per year. In India, that is nearly 27,000 rupees ($330) per year. There is no level playing field. Indian farmers cannot compete with these highly motorized or mechanized farms of America.”

While Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has addressed the protesters — saying that they “will not suffer any harm” as the trade deal is “fair, equitable, and balanced” —  Prasad warned they were prepared to stage a strike similar to the 2020-21 protest, in which they opposed three farm acts that sought to open the sector to corporations.

The strike, that lasted nearly 18 months, involved millions of protesters and was India’s largest and longest in recent times. It forced the government to repeal the contested legislation.

“America will dictate Indian policy, so the sovereignty of the Indian people and the country is totally being compromised,” Prasad said.

“We feel this is a total surrender of Indian farmers and Indian agriculture to imperialist, multinational corporations. We cannot accept it. We will stop it. We will come to the streets and build this agitation bigger than the 2021 farmers’ agitation.”